Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 215-219

  Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical; Fluoride; Glass ionomer cement; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILICATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AGED; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0033144104     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos1070309.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. WILSON AD, KENT BE. The glass ionomer cement, a new translucent cement for dentistry. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 1971; 21: 313-319.
2. DIJKEN VAN JWV. Conventional, microfilled and hybrid composite resins: Laboratory and clinical evaluations. Thesis, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden, 1987.
3. DIJKEN VAN JWV. Three year evaluation of effects of surface conditioning on bonding of glass ionomer cement in cervical abrasion lesions. A three year clinical evaluation. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 133-135.
4. WILSON AD. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3: 425-429.
5. MATHIS RS, FERRACANE JL. Properties of a glass ionomer/ resin composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 355-358.
6. SJÖDIN L, UUSITALO M, VAN DIJKEN JWV. Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in direct class V and class II sandwich restorations. Swed Dent J 1996; 20: 77-86.
7. DIJKEN VAN J, ANDERSSON-WENCKERT I. Kompomerer. Ett steg framåt - eller? In: HJÖRTING-HANSEN E, ed. Odontologi. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1998; 63-76.
8. DIJKEN VAN JWV. 3-year evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III cavities. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 195-198.
9. HÖGLUND-ÅBERG C, DIJKEN VAN JWV, ULOFSSON AL. Three year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 140-149.
10. BORGMEIJER PJ, KREULEN CM, AMERONGEN WE, AKERBOOM HBM, GRUYTHUYSEN RMJ. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with class II composite resin restorations. J Dent Child 1991; 58: 378-383.
11. SIEGEL S. Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956; 166-172.
12. DAVIS BA, FRIEDL K-H, POWERS JN. Color stability of hybrid ionomers after accelerated aging. J Prosthodont 1995; 4: 111-115.
13. DIJKEN VAN JWV, HÖRSTEDT P. In vivo enamel adaptation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1: 185-190.
14. DIJKEN VAN JWV, KIERI C, CARLÉN M. Clinical evaluation of resin modified GIC-composite sandwich restorations. J Dent Res 1999; in press.
15. MJÖR IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries. A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 171-174.
16. WENDT L-K, KOCH G, BIRKHED D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Swed Dent J 1998; 22: 149-155.
17. DIJKEN VAN JWV, KALFAS S, LITRA V, OLIVEBY A. Fluoride and Mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite. Caries Res 1997; 31: 379-383.
18. DIJKEN VAN JWV, OLOFSSON AL, HOLM C. Five year clinical evaluation of Class III composite resin restorations in cavities pretreated with an oxalic- or a phosphoric acid. J Oral Rehab 1999; in press.
19. QVIST V, LAURBERG L, POULSEN A, TEGLERS PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1387-1396.
20. ERICKSON RL, GLASSPOOLE. Bonding to tooth structure: A comparison of glass ionomer and composite resin systems. In: HUNT PR, ed. Glass Ionomers: The next generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994; 101-122.
21. BURGESS J, NORLING B, SUMMITT J. Resin ionomer restorative materials. The new generation. In: HUNT PR, ed. Glass Ionomers: The next generation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Glass Ionomers. Philadelphia: International Symposia in Dentistry, PC, 1994; 75-86.