Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 185, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 101-110

  Heuer, Herbert ^a   Hegele, Mathias ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 38649085369     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1135-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bedford FL (1989) Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:232-248
2. Bedford FL (1993) Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:517-530
3. Bedford FL (1995) Constraints on perceptual learning: objects and dimensions. Cognition 54:253-297
4. Bernier P-M, Chua R, Franks IM (2005) Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements? Exp Brain Res 167:292-296
5. Bock O (1992) Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensory-motor discordance: evidence for direction-independent gain control. Behav Brain Res 51:41-50
6. Canon LK (1970) Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. J Exp Psychol 84:141-147
7. Canon LK (1971) Directed attention and maladaptive "adaptation" to displacement of the visual field. J Exp Psychol 88:403-408
8. Clower DM, Boussaoud D (2000) Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. J Neurophysiol 84:2703-2708
9. Cohen MM (1967) Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects. Percept Mot Skills 24:1295-1302
10. Cohen MM (1974) Changes in auditory localization following prismatic exposure under continuous and terminal visual feedback. Percept Mot Skills 38:1202
11. Davidson PR, Jones RD, Sirisena HR, Andreae JH (2000) Detection of adaptive inverse models in the human motor system. Hum Mov Sci 19:761-795
12. Flanagan JR, Rao A (1995) Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74:2174-2178
13. Frensch PA, Haider H, Rünger D, Neugebauer U, Voigt S, Werg J (2002) Verbal report of incidentally experienced environmental regularity: the route from implicit learning to verbal expression of what has been learned. In: Jiménez L (ed) Attention and implicit learning. Benjamins, New York, pp 335-366
14. Goodbody SJ, Wolpert M (1999) The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Exp Brain Res 127:213-223
15. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extent variability. Exp Brain Res 99:97-111
16. Haider H, Frensch PA (2005) The generation of conscious awareness in an incidental learning situation. Psychol Res 69:399-411
17. Heuer H, Hegele M (2007) Learning new visuo-motor gains at early and late working age. Ergonomics 50:979-1003
18. Heuer H, Hegele M (in press) Adaptation to a nonlinear visuo-motor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal visual feedback. J Mot Behav
19. Heuer H, Sangals J (1998) Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuo-motor transformations. Exp Brain Res 119:224-236
20. Jordan MI (1996) Computational aspects of motor control and learning. In: Heuer H, Keele SW (eds) Handbook of perception and action, vol 2: motor skills. Academic, London, pp 71-120
21. Kelso JAS, Cook E, Olson ME, Epstein W (1975) Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1:237-245
22. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Mentis M, Barnes A, Veytsman M, Eidelberg D, Ghez C (2004) Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: a PET study. J Neurophysiol 91:924-933
23. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916-8924
24. Proteau L, Isabelle G (2002) On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. J Mot Behav 34:367-384
25. Proteau L, Marteniuk RG, Lévesque L (1992) A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: evidence indicating specificity of practice. Q J Exp Psychol 44A:557-575
26. Proteau L, Marteniuk RG, Girouard Y, Dugas C (1987) On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Hum Mov Sci 6:181-199
27. Redding GM, Wallace B (1990) Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. J Mot Behav 22:209-224
28. Rossetti Y, Desmurget M, Prablanc C (1995) Vector coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? J Neurophysiol 74:457-463
29. Smeets JBJ, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DDJ, van Beers MJ, Brenner E (2006) Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:18781-18786
30. Uhlarik J, Canon L (1971) Influences of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. J Exp Psychol 91:233-239
31. Vindras P, Desmurget P, Viviani P (2005) Error parsing in visuomotor pointing reveals independent processing of amplitude and direction. J Neurophysiol 94:1212-1224
32. Vindras P, Viviani P (1998) Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:569-591
33. Vindras P, Viviani P (2002) Altering the visuomotor gain. Evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities. Exp Brain Res 147:280-295
34. Welch RB (1972) The effect of experienced limb identity upon adaptation to simulated displacement of the visual field. Percept Psychophys 12:453-456
35. Welch RB (1978) Perceptual modification. Adapting to altered sensory environments. Academic, New York
36. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103:460-470