Trajectories in Operating a Handheld Tool

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 375-389

  Heuer, Herbert ^a   Sülzenbrück, Sandra ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

motor control; movement trajectories; tool use; visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUE; TOOL USE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REFERENCE VALUES; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349143621     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.2.375     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abend W., Bizzi E., and Morasso P. Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105 (1982) 331-348
2. Atkeson C.G., and Hollerbach M. Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. Journal of Neuroscience 5 (1985) 2318-2320
3. Berti A., and Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (2000) 415-420
4. Bock O. Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensory-motor discordance: Evidence for direction-independent gain control. Behavioral Brain Research 51 (1992) 41-50
5. Bock O., and Burghoff M. Visuo-motor adaptation: Evidence for a distributed amplitude control system. Behavioral Brain Research 89 (1997) 267-273
6. Brenner E., and Smeets J.B. Moving one's finger to a visually specified position: Target orientation influences the finger's path. Experimental Brain Research 105 (1995) 318-320
7. Chan T.C. The effect of density and diameter on haptic perception of rod length. Perception & Psychophysics 57 (1995) 778-786
8. Chernikoff R., Duey J.W., and Taylor F.V. Two-dimensional tracking with identical and different control dynamics in each coordinate. Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (1960) 318-322
9. Chernikoff R., and LeMay M. Effect of various display-control configurations on tracking with identical and different coordinate dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (1963) 95-99
10. Cruse H., and Brüwer M. The human arm as a redundant manipulator: The control of path and joint angles. Biological Cybernetics 57 (1987) 137-144
11. Desmurget M., Prablanc C., Jordan M.I., and Jeannerod M. Are reaching movements planned to be straight and invariant in the extrinsic space? Kinematic comparisons between compliant and unconstrained motions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A (1999) 981-1020
12. Fitts P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (1954) 381-391
13. Fitts P.M., and Peterson J.R. Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (1964) 103-112
14. Flanagan J.R., and Lolley S. The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. Journal of Neuroscience 21 (2001) 1361-1369
15. Flanagan J.R., and Rao A. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. Journal of Neurophysiology 74 (1995) 2174-2178
16. Flash T., and Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience 5 (1985) 1688-1703
17. Gallagher A.G., McClure N., McGuigan J., Ritchie K., and Sheehy N.P. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 617-620
18. Goodbody S.J., and Wolpert D.M. The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Experimental Brain Research 127 (1999) 213-223
19. Gordon J., Ghilardi M.F., Cooper S.E., and Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II: Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Experimental Brain Research 99 (1994) 112-130
20. Gordon J., Ghilardi M.F., and Ghez C. Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I: Independence of direction and extent variability. Experimental Brain Research 99 (1994) 97-111
21. Haggard P.N., and Richardson J. Spatial patterns in the control of human arm movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 42-62
22. Heuer H., and Hegele M. Learning new visuo-motor gains at early and late working age. Ergonomics 50 (2007) 979-1003
23. Heuer H., and Hegele M. Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice. Experimental Brain Research 185 (2008) 101-110
24. Heuer, H. & Hegele, M. (in press). Adaptation to a nonlinear visuo-motor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior
25. Hogan N. An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. Journal of Neuroscience 4 (1984) 2745-2754
26. Hollerbach J.M., and Atkenson C.G. Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilities. Biological Cybernetics 56 (1987) 279-292
27. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (2001) 849-937
28. Iriki A., Tanaka M., and Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. NeuroReport 7 (1996) 2325-2330
29. Kaminski T., and Gentile A.M. Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 18 (1986) 261-278
30. Katz D. Der Aufbau der Tastwelt [The world of touch] (1925), Barth, Leipzig, Germany
31. Kingma I., van de Langenberg R., and Beek P.J. Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 346-354
32. Krakauer J.W., Ghilardi M.F., and Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1026-1031
33. Krakauer J.W., Pine Z.M., Ghilardi M.F., and Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. The Journal of Neuroscience 20 (2000) 8916-8924
34. Kunde W. Antezedente Effektrepräsentationen in der Verhaltenssteuerung [Antecedent effect codes in action control]. Psychologische Rundschau 57 (2006) 34-42
35. Kunde W., Koch I., and Hoffmann J. Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 57A (2004) 87-106
36. Kunde W., Müsseler J., and Heuer H. Compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors 49 (2007) 661-670
37. Miall R.C., and Haggard P.N. The curvature of human arm movements in the absence of visual experience. Experimental Brain Research 103 (1995) 421-428
38. Morasso P. Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research 42 (1981) 223-227
39. Morasso P. Three dimensional arm trajectories. Biological Cybernetics 48 (1983) 187-194
40. Navon D. Resources-A theoretical soup stone?. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 216-234
41. Nelson W.L. Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biological Cybernetics 46 (1983) 135-147
42. Pfann K.D., Corcos D.M., Moore C.G., and Hasan Z. Circle-drawing movements at different speeds: Role of intertial anisotropy. Journal of Neurophysiology 88 (2002) 2399-2407
43. Prinz W. Why don't we perceive our brain states?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 4 (1992) 1-20
44. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9 (1997) 129-154
45. Shadmehr R., and Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience 14 (1994) 3208-3224
46. Tendick F., Jennings R.W., Tharp G., and Stark L. Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: Experiment, analysis, and observation. Presence 2 (1993) 66-81
47. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 907-915
48. Tong C., Wolpert D.M., and Flanagan J.R. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: Evidence from an interference study. Journal of Neuroscience 22 (2002) 1108-1113
49. Uno Y., Kawato M., and Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement: Minimum torque-change model. Biological Cybernetics 61 (1989) 89-101
50. van de Langenberg R., Kingma T., and Beek P. Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32 (2006) 1093-1106
51. Van Thiel E., Meulenbroek R.G.J., and Hulstijn W. Path curvature in workspace and in joint space: Evidence for coexisting coordinative rules in aiming. Motor Control 2 (2006) 331-351
52. Verwey W.B., and Heuer H. Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: Locus and modularity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2007) 1629-1659
53. Vindras P., and Viviani P. Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 569-591
54. Vindras P., and Viviani P. Altering the visuomotor gain. Evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities. Experimental Brain Research 147 (2002) 280-295
55. Witt J.K., Proffitt D.R., and Epstein W. Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 880-888
56. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., and Jordan M.I. Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research 98 (1994) 153-156
57. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., and Jordan M.I. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Experimental Brain Research 103 (1995) 460-470