Adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal visual feedback

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 368-379

  Heuer, Herbert ^a   Hegele, Mathias ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Feedback; Motor learning; Perception action coupling

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; ERROR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; MALE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PERFORMANCE; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 51849158195     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.40.5.368-379     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Angel, R. W., Garland, H., & Fischler, M. (1971). Training errors amended without visual feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 422-424.
2. Arnold, P., Farrell, M. J., Pettifar, S., & West, A. J. (2002). Performance of a skilled motor task in virtual and real environments. Ergonomics, 45, 348-361.
3. Baily, J. S. (1972). Adaptation to prisms: Do proprioceptive changes mediate adapted behavior without ballistic arm movements? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 8-20.
4. Bedford, F. L. (1989). Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 232-248.
5. Bedford, F. L. (1995). Constraints on perceptual learning: Objects and dimensions. Cognition, 54, 253-297.
6. Bernier, P. M., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2005). Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements? Experimental Brain Research, 167, 292-296.
7. Bock, O. (1992). Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensory-motor discordance: Evidence for direction-independent gain control. Behavioral Brain Research, 51, 41-50.
8. Bock, O., & Burghoff, M. (1997). Visuomotor adaptation: Evidence for a distributed amplitude control system. Behavioral Brain Research, 89, 267-273.
9. Buch, E. R., Young, S., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2003). Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging. Learning and Memory, 10, 55-63.
10. Clower, D. M., & Boussaoud, D. (2000). Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 2703-2708.
11. Cohen, M. M. (1967). Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 1295-1302.
12. Cordo, P. J. (1990). Kinesthetic control of a multijoint movement sequence. Journal of Neurophysiology, 63, 161-172.
13. Cunningham, H. A., & Welch, R. B. (1994). Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: Implications for models of adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 987-999.
14. Davidson, P. R., Jones, R. D., Sirisena, H. R., & Andreae, J. H. (2000). Detection of adaptive inverse models in the human motor system. Human Movement Science, 19, 761-795.
15. Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423-431.
16. Dolezal, H. (1982). Living in a world transformed. Perceptual and performatory adaptation to visual distortion. New York: Academic Press.
17. Flanagan, J. R., & Rao, A. (1995). Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 2174-2178.
18. Frensch, P. A., Haider, H., Rünger, D., Neugebauer, U., Voigt, S., & Werg, J. (2002). Verbal report of incidentally experienced environmental regularity: The route from implicit learning to verbal expression of what has been learned. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and implicit learning (pp. 335-366). New York: Benjamins.
19. Gentaz, E., & Hatwell, Y. (2006). Geometrical haptic illusions: The role of exploration in the Müller-Lyer, vertical-horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 31-40.
20. Goodbody, S. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Experimental Brain Research, 127, 213-223.
21. Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (2005). The generation of conscious awareness in an incidental learning situation. Psychological Research, 69, 399-411.
22. Held R., & Hein A. (1958). Adaptation to disarranged hand-eye coordination contingent upon reafferent stimulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 87-90.
23. Heuer, H. (1983). Bewegungslernen. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
24. Heuer, H. (2003). Motor control. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 317-354). New York: Wiley.
25. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2007). Learning new visuomotor gains at early and late working age. Ergonomics, 50, 979-1003.
26. Jordan, M. I. (1996). Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In H. Heuer & S.W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 2. Motor skills (pp. 71-120). London: Academic Press.
27. Kitazawa, S., Kimura T., & Uka, T. (1997). Prism adaptation of reaching movements: Specificity for the velocity of reaching. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1481-1492.
28. Koh, K., & Meyer, D. E. (1991). Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 811-836.
29. Kottenhoff, H. (1957). Situational and personal influences on space perception with experimental spectacles: Part I. Prolonged experiments with inverting glasses. Acta Psychologica, 13, 79-97.
30. Krakauer, J. W., Ghilardi, M. F., Mentis, M., Barnes, A., Veytsman, M., Eidelberg D., et al. (2004). Differential cortical and subcortical activations in learning rotations and gains for reaching: A PET study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 924-933.
31. Krakauer, J. W., Pine, Z. M., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (2000). Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8916-8924.
32. Proteau, L., & Carnahan, H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: Vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 226-234.
33. Proteau, L., & Isabelle, G. (2002). On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 367-384.
34. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
35. Reid, R. L. (1954). An illusion of movement complementary to horizontal-vertical illusion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 107-111.
36. Sangals, J. (1997). Der Einfluß der Bewegungsrückmeldung auf das Erlernen nichtlinearer Werkzeugtransformationen [The effect of movement feedback on the acquisition of nonlinear tool transformations]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
37. Sarlegna, F., Blouin, J., Vercher, J.-L., Bresciani, J.-P., Bourdin, C., & Gauthier, G. M. (2004). Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 468-471.
38. Shadmehr, R. (2004). Generalization as a behavioral window to the neural mechanisms of learning internal models. Human Movement Science, 23, 543-568.
39. Smeets, J. B. J., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J., de Grave, D. D. J., van Beers, M. J., & Brenner, E. (2006). Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 18781-18786.
40. Smith, K. U. (1966). Cybernetic theory and analysis of learning. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Acquisition of skill (pp. 425-482). New York: Academic Press.
41. Tendick, F., Jennings, R. W., Tharp, G., & Stark, L. (1993). Sensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: Experiment, analysis, and observation. Presence, 2, 66-81.
42. Verwey, W. B., & Heuer, H. (2007). Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: Locus and modularity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1629-1659.
43. Welch, R. B. (1972). The effect of experienced limb identity upon adaptation to simulated displacement of the visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 453-456.
44. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Experimental Brain Research, 103, 460-470.
45. Wong, T. S. (1977). Dynamic properties of radial and tangential movements as determinants of the haptic horizontal-vertical illusion with a L-figure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 151-164.