Effects of occlusal inclination and loading on mandibular bone remodeling: A finite element study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 527-537

  Rungsiyakull, Chaiy ^a   Rungsiyakull, Pimduen ^b   Li, Qing ^a   Li, Wei ^a   Swain, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Bone implant interface; Cusp inclination; Dental implant; Occlusal load

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE REMODELING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; JAW; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BITE FORCE; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84555163274     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Naert IE, Duyck JAJ, Hosny MMF, van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patient. Part I: An up to 15-years clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 237-244.
2. Salinas TJ, Eckert SE. In patients requiring single-tooth replacement, what are the outcomes of implant- as compared to tooth-supported restorations? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 71-92.
3. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 197-212.
4. Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A meta-analysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 80-90.
5. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kilicarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G. Threedimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 227-234.
6. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 447-462.
7. Akca K, Cehreli MC. Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: A finite element stress analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2006; 44: 527-535.
8. Isidor F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 8-18.
9. Holt RL, Rosenberg MM, Zinser PJ, Ganeles J. A concept for a biologically derived, parabolic implant design. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 473-482.
10. Michaels GC, Carr AB, Larsen PE. Effect of prosthetic superstructure accuracy on the osteointegrated implant bone interface. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83: 198-205.
11. Neugebauer J, Traini T, Thams U, Piattelli A, Zoller JE. Periimplant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: A minipig study. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 152-160.
12. Carlsson GE. Dental occlusion: Modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics. Odontology 2009; 97: 8-17.
13. Taylor TD, Belser U, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 101-107.
14. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 26-35.
15. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 1987; 20: 1135-1150.
16. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 845-853.
17. Garcia JM, Doblare M, Cegonino J. Bone remodelling simulation:A tool for implant design. Comp Mater Sci 2002; 25: 100-114.
18. Curtis DA, Sharma A, Finzen FC, Kao RT. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient. J Calif Dent Assoc 2000; 28: 771-779.
19. Stanford CM. Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion:What do we know, and what do we need to find out? J Calif Dent Assoc 2005; 33: 329-336.
20. Khamis MM, Zaki HS, Rudy TE. A comparison of the effect of different occlusal forms in mandibular implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 422-429.
21. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: An in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 465-475.
22. Weinberg LA. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part I. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 293-301.
23. Kaukinen JA, Edge MJ, Lang BR. The influence of occlusal design on simulated masticatory forces transferred to implant-retained prostheses and supporting bone. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 50-55.
24. Kiliaridis S, Bresin A, Holm J, Strid KG. Effects of masticatory muscle function on bone mass in the mandible of the growing rat. Acta Anat (Basel) 1996; 155: 200-205.
25. Bresin A, Kiliaridis S, Strid KG. Effect of masticatory function on the internal bone structure in the mandible of the growing rat. Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107: 35-44.
26. Giesen EBW, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden T. Reduced mechanical load decreases the density, stiffness, and strength of cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle. Clin Biomech 2003; 18: 358-363.
27. Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Swain M. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed 2009; 2: 410-432.
28. Rungsiyakull C, Li Q, Sun GY, Li W, Swain MV. Surface morphology optimization for osseointegration of coated implants. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 7196-7204.
29. O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection. Chicago:Quintessence, 2008.
30. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Finite-element analysis of crestal bone loss around porous-coated dental implants. J Appl Biomater 1995; 6: 267-282.
31. Li W, Swain MV, Li Q, Steven GP. Towards automated 3D finite element modeling of direct fiber-reinforced composite dental bridge. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2005;74B:520-528.
32. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech 1992; 25: 1425-1441.
33. Mellal A, Wiskott HWA, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone:Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 239-248.
34. Chou HY, Jagodnik JJ, Muftu S. Predictions of bone remodeling around dental implant systems. J Biomech 2008; 41: 1365-1373.
35. Li I, Li H, Shi L, et al. A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1073-1078.
36. Huang HL, Lin CL, Ko CC, Chang CH, Hsu JT, Huang JS. Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone: In-line versus offset placements of implants. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 501-508.
37. Frost HM. The Laws of Bone Structure. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1964.
38. Carter DR. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 1984; 36: S19-S24.
39. Lin D, Li Q, Li W, Duckmanton N, Swain M. Mandibular bone remodeling induced by dental implant. J Biomech 2010; 43: 287-293.
40. Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB. Relations of mechanicalproperties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 1995; 17: 347-355.
41. O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Katz JO, Spencer P. Anisotropic elastic properties of cancellous bone from a human edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 415-421.
42. O’Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 648-657.
43. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone: An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 286-293.
44. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 15-46.
45. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: Current perspectives and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 66-75.
46. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 121-132.
47. Weinberg LA. Therapeutic biomechanics concepts and clinical procedures to reduce implant loading. Part II: Therapeutic differential loading. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 302-310.
48. Duyck J, Vandamme K, Geris L, et al. The influence of micromotion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Arch Oral Biol 2006; 51: 1-9.
49. Berzins A, Shah B, Weinans H, Sumner DR. Nondestructive measurements of implant-bone interface shear modulus and effects of implant geometry in pull-out tests. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 34: 337-340.
50. Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1-12.
51. Deng B, Tan KBC, Lu Y, et al. Inverse identification of elastic modulus of dental implant-bone interfacial tissue using neural network and FEA model. Inverse Probl Sci En 2009; 17: 1073-1083.
52. Crupi V, Guglielimino E, La Rosa G, Sloten JV, Van Oosterwyck H. Numerical analysis of bone adaptation around an oral implant due to overload stress. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2004; 218: 407-415.
53. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van’t Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NHJ. Implant surface roughness and bone healing:A systematic review. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 496-500.
54. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The optimum pore-size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop 1980:263-270.
55. Helgason B, Viceconti M, Runarsson TP, Brynjolfsson S. On the mechanical stability of porous coated press fit titanium implants: A finite element study of a pushout test. J Biomech 2008; 41: 1675-1681.