Reduced mechanical load decreases the density, stiffness, and strength of cancellous bone of the mandibular condyle

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 358-363

  Giesen, E B W ^a,d   Ding, M ^b   Dalstra, M ^b,c   Van Eijden, T M G J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Cancellous bone; Edentate; Mandibular condyle; Mechanical properties

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPRESSION TESTING; LOADS (FORCES); STIFFNESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS;

MECHANICAL LOADS;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CADAVER; CANCELLOUS BONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; STRESS STRAIN RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 0345701436     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00018-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bassi F., Procchio M., Fava C., Schierano G., Preti G. Bone density in human dentate and edentulous mandibles using computed tomography. Clin. Oral Implan. Res. 10:1999;356-361.
2. Boretti G., Bickel M., Geering A.H. A review of masticatory ability and efficiency. J. Prosthet. Dent. 74:1995;400-403.
3. Bouvier M. Effect of age on the ability of the rat temporomandibular joint to respond to changing functional demands. J. Dent. Res. 67:1988;1206-1212.
4. Bresin A., Kiliaridis S., Strid K.G. Effect of masticatory function on the internal bone structure in the mandible of the growing rat. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 107:1999;35-44.
5. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 59-A:1977;954-962.
6. Ciarelli T.E., Fyhrie D.P., Schaffler M.B., Goldstein S.A. Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J. Bone Miner. Res. 15:2000;32-40.
7. Dalstra M., Huiskes R., Odgaard A., van Erning L. Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 26:1993;523-535.
8. Ding M. Age variations in the properties of human tibial trabecular bone and cartilage. Acta Orthop. Scand. 71(Suppl. 292):2000;1-45.
9. Ding M., Dalstra M., Danielsen C.C., Kabel J., Hvid I., Linde F. Age variations in the properties of human tibial trabecular bone. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79-B:1997;995-1002.
10. Ebbesen E.N., Thomsen J.S., Beck-Nielsen H., Nepper-Rasmussen H.J., Mosekilde L. Age- and gender-related differences in vertebral bone mass, density, and strength. J. Bone Miner. Res. 14:1999;1394-1403.
11. Giesen E.B.W., Van Eijden T.M.G.J. The three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the human mandibular condyle. J. Dent. Res. 79:2000;957-963.
12. Giesen E.B.W., Ding M., Dalstra M., Van Eijden T.M.G.J. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J. Biomech. 34:2001;799-803.
13. Haraldson T., Karlsson U., Carlsson G.E. Bite force and oral function in complete denture wearers. J. Oral Rehabil. 6:1979;41-48.
14. Helkimo E., Carlsson G.E., Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol. Scand. 35:1977;297-303.
15. Hongo T., Orihara K., Onoda Y., Nakajima K., Ide Y. Quantitative and morphological studies of the trabecular bones in the condyloid processes of the Japanese mandibles; changes due to aging. Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll. 30:1989;165-174.
16. Hongo T., Yotsuya H., Shibuya K., Kawase M., Ide Y. Quantitative and morphological studies on the trabecular bones in the condyloid processes of the Japanese mandibles. Comparison between dentulous and edentulous specimens. Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll. 30:1989;67-76.
17. Huiskes R. If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J. Anat. 197(Pt 2):2000;145-156.
18. Kawashima T., Abe S., Okada M., Kawada E., Saitoh C., Ide Y. Internal structure of the temporomandibular joint and the circumferential bone: comparison between dentulous and edentulous specimens. Bull. Tokyo Dent. Coll. 38:1997;87-93.
19. Keaveny T.M., Pinilla T.P., Crawford R.P., Kopperdahl D.L., Lou A. Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J. Orthopaed. Res. 15:1997;101-110.
20. Kiliaridis S., Bresin A., Holm J., Strid K.G. Effects of masticatory muscle function on bone mass in the mandible of the growing rat. Acta Anat. 155:1996;200-205.
21. Linde F., G ø thgen C.B., Hvid I., Pongsoipetch B., Bentzen S. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone by a non-destructive compression testing approach. Eng. Med. 17:1988;23-29.
22. Linde F., Hvid I., Madsen F. The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomech. 25:1992;359-368.
23. Linde F. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Dan. Med. Bull. 41:1994;119-138.
24. Newton J.P., Yemm R., Abel R.W., Menhinick S. Changes in human jaw muscles with age and dental state. Gerodontology. 10:1993;16-22.
25. Turner C.H. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone. 23:1998;399-407.
26. Von Wowern N., Stoltze K. Sex and age differences in bone morphology of mandibles. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 86:1978;478-485.
27. Yamada M., Ito M., Hayashi K., Sato H., Nakamura T. Mandibular condyle bone mineral density measurement by quantitative computed tomography: a gender-related difference in correlation to spinal bone mineral density. Bone. 21:1997;441-445.