Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone: In-line versus offset placements of implants

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 501-508

  Huang, H L ^a   Lin, C L ^b   Ko, C C ^c   Chang, C H ^a   Hsu, J T ^a   Huang, J S ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Finite element analysis; In line and offset placements

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL CARE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANISOTROPY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MANDIBLE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33745023619     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01598.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Geng JP Tan KBC Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 85 : 585 598.
2. Rangert B Krogh PHJ Langer B. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 10 : 326 334.
3. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 1999 13 : 99 119.
4. Miyata T Kobayashi Y Araki H. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: a histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 15 : 425 431.
5. Rangert B Sullivan RM Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 12 : 360 370.
6. Daellenbach K Hurley E Brunski JB. Biomechanics of in-line vs. offset implants supporting a partial prosthesis. J Dent Res. 1996 75 : 183.
7. Weinberg LA Kruger B. An evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual off set. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996 16 : 253 257.
8. Sato Y Shindoi N Hosokawa R Tsuga K Akagawa Y. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 27 : 15 21.
9. Itoh H Caputo AA Kuroe T Nakahara H. Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 24 : 47 55.
10. Akca K lplikciogiu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 16 : 722 730.
11. O'Mahony AM Williams JL Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and concellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2001 12 : 648 657.
12. Lari N. Convergence requirements. In : Rao SS, ed. The Finite Element Method in Engineering, 3rd ed. Boston : Butterworth Heinemann 1990 : 123 125.
13. Chang CH. Computer aided analysis of femoral stem prosthesis. PhD Dissertation, Huston, TX : Rice University 1990.
14. Sertgoz A Guvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 76 : 165 169.
15. Ciftci Y Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 15 : 571 582.
16. Barbier L Van der Sloten J Krzesinski G Schepers E Van Der Perre G. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 25 : 847 858.
17. Isidor F. Loss of osseointergration caused by osslusal load of oral implant. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1996 8 : 143 152.
18. Chavez H Ortman LF DeFranco RL Medige J. Assessment of oral implant mobility. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 7 : 345 353.
19. Quirynen M Naert I van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and implant success in Branemark system. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1992 3 : 104 111.
20. Stegaroiu R Sato T Kusakari H. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 13 : 82 90.
21. Wang TM Leu LJ Wang JS Lin LD. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 17 : 231 237.
22. Misch CE. Clinical biomechanics. In : Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 1st ed. St Louis : Mosby, 1993 : 298 300.
23. Holmgren EP Seckinger RJ Kilgren LM Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis - a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implant. 1998 24 : 80 88.
24. Donath K Hassell T Jovanovic S Richter J. Peri-implant pathology. In : Klaus HR Herbert EW, eds. Color Atlas of Dental Medicine-Implantology. New York : Thieme Medical Publishers, 1995 : 318 319.