Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 496-500

  Shalabi, M M ^a   Gortemaker, A ^a   Van't Hof, M A ^a   Jansen, J A ^a   Creugers, N H J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone healing; Implant; Surface roughness; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; META ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TORQUE; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; OSSEOINTEGRATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TORQUE; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 33745411473     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500603     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Albrektsson T (2001). Is surgical skill more important for clinical success than changes in implant hardware? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3:174-175.
2. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2004a). Oral implant surfaces: Part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 17:536-543.
3. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2004b). Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 17:544-564.
4. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H (1991). Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25:889-902.
5. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T (1988). Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:21-24.
6. Cochran DL (1999). A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periadontol 70:1523-1539.
7. Dhert WJ, Klein CP, Wolke JG, van der Velde EA, de Groot K, Rozing PM (1991). A mechanical investigation of fluorapatite, magnesium whitlockite, and hydroxylapatite plasma-sprayed coatings in goats. J Biomed Mater Res 25:1183-1200.
8. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, de Wijn JR, Klein CP, de Groot K, et al. (1992). A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 26:119-130.
9. Dhert WJ, Klein CP, Jansen JA, van der Velde EA, Vriesde RC, Rozing PM, et al. (1993). A histological and histomorphometrical investigation of fluorapatite, magnesiumwhitlockite, and hydroxylapatite plasma-sprayed coatings in goats. J Biomed Mater Res 27:127-138.
10. 2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 3:77-84.
11. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 29:1223-1231.
12. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, Wennerberg A (2001a). The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: an in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res 57:485-496.
13. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A (2003). An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials 24:701-710.
14. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A (2003). Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 53(6 Suppl 2):409-443.
15. Lee JJ, Rouhfar L, Beirne OR (2000). Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: a meta-analytic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:1372-1379; discussion 1379-1380.
16. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB (2002). Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:369-376.
17. Macdonald W, Campbell P, Fisher J, Wennerberg A (2004). Variation in surface texture measurements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 15:262-269.
18. Morra M, Cassinelli C, Bruzzone G, Carpi A, Di Santi G, Giardino R, et al. (2003). Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:40-45.
19. Novaes AB Jr, Souza SL, de Oliveira PT, Souza AM (2002). Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:377-383.
20. Rupprecht S, Bloch A, Rosiwal S, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J (2002). Examination of the bone-metal interface of titanium implants coated by the microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:778-785.
21. Sandborn PM, Cook SD, Spires WP, Kester MA (1988). Tissue response to porous-coated implants lacking initial bone apposition. J Arthroplasty 3:337-346.
22. Stach RM, Kohles SS (2003). A meta-analysis examining the clinical survivability of machined-surfaced and osseotite implants in poor-quality bone. Implant Dent 12:87-96.
23. Thompson JI, Gregson PJ, Reveil PA (1999). Analysis of push-out test data based on interfacial fracture energy. J Mater Sci Mater Med 10:863-868.
24. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA (1998a). Bone healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxylapatite-coated oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 9:261-271.
25. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA (2000a). A mechanical evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 1. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:305-313.
26. Vercaigne S, Wolke JG, Naert I, Jansen JA (2000b). A histological evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 2. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:314-324.
27. Wennerberg A (1996). On surface roughness and implant incorporation (dissertation). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg.
28. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2000). Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:331-344.
29. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B (1996a). Experimental study of turned and grit-blasted screw-shaped implants with special emphasis on effects of blasting material and surface topography. Biomaterials 17:15-22.