Putting words in perspective

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 863-873

  Borghi, Anna M ^a   Glenberg, Arthur M ^b   Kaschak, Michael P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LANGUAGE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 11144296347     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196865     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ANDERSON, R. C., & ORTONY, A. (1975). On putting apples into bottles: A problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 167-180.
2. ARKIN, R. C. (1998). Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. BARSALOU, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.
4. BARSALOU, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999a). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
6. BARSALOU, L. W. (1999b). Author's response: Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 637-660.
7. BARSALOU, L. W. (2002). Being there conceptually: Simulating categories in preparation for situated action. In N. L. Stein, P. J. Bauer, & M. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Representation, memory, and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. BARSALOU, L. W., SOLOMON, K. O., & WU, L. L. (1999). Perceptual simulation in conceptual tasks. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological, and psychological perspectives in cognitive linguistics: The proceedings of the 4th conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association (Vol. 3, pp. 209-228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. CLARK, H. H. (1975). Bridging. In R. Schank & B. Nash-Webber (Eds.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 188-193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
11. DREYFUS, H. L. (1992). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. DUCHAN, J. F., BRUDER, G. A., & HEWITT, L. A. (1995). Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. ELLIS, R., & TUCKER, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-471.
14. GERLACH, C., LAW, I., & PAULSON, O. B. (2002). When action turns into words: Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1230-1239.
15. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
16. GLENBERG, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
17. GLENBERG, A. M., & KASCHAK, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.
18. GLENBERG, A. M., & ROBERTSON, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 379-401.
19. HERTZBERG, J. (1999). Planning. In J. Webster (Ed.), Encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering (Vol. 16, pp. 493-504). London: Wiley.
20. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
21. KAKO, E., & TRUESWELL, J. C. (2000). Verb meanings, object affordances, and the incremental restriction of reference. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 256-261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. KASCHAK, M. P., & GLENBERG, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 508-529.
23. KEIL, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. KOSSLYN, S. M., BALL, T. M., & REISER, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 47-60.
25. LANDAUER, T. K., & DUMAIS, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
26. MACWHINNEY, B. (in press). The emergence of grammar from perspective. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. MARTIN, A., HAXBY, J. V., LALONDE, F. M., WIGGS, C. L., & UNGERLEIDER, L. G. (1995). Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science, 270, 102-105.
28. MARTIN, A., UNGERLEIDER, L. G., & HAXBY, J. V. (2001). Category specificity and the brain: The sensory-motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1023-1036). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. MARTIN, A., WIGGS, C. L., UNGERLEIDER, L. G., & HAXBY, G. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category specific knowledge. Nature, 379, 649-652.
30. MATARIC, M. J. (2001). Behavior-based robotics. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (MITECS) (pp. 74-77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. MATARIĆ, M. J. (2002). Situated robotics. In Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 4, pp. 25-30). London: Nature Publisher Group, Macmillan Reference.
32. MCCLOSKEY, M. E., & GLUCKSBERG, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472.
33. MCCLOSKEY, M. E., & GLUCKSBERG, S. (1979). Decision processes in verifying category membership statements: Implications for models of semantic memory. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 1-37.
34. MURPHY, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. NOLFI, S., & FLOREANO, D. (2000). Evolutionary robotics: The biology, technology, and intelligence of self-organizing machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. NORMAN, D. A., & RUMELHART, D. (1975). Exploration in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.
37. PALMER, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
38. PALMER, S. [E.], ROSCH, E., & CHASE, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long and A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. PECHER, D., ZEELENBERG, R., & BARSALOU, L. W. (2003). Verifying properties from different modalities for concepts produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124.
40. PULVERMüLLER, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 253-279.
41. ROTH, E. M., & SHOBEN, E. J. (1983). The effect of context on the structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 346-378.
42. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 830-846.
43. TUCKER, M., & ELLIS, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8, 769-800.
44. ZWAAN, R. A., & MADDEN, C. J. (in press). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. ZWAAN, R. A., & YAXLEY, R. H. (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 954-958.