In defense of representation

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 138-171

  Markman, Arthur B ^a   Dietrich, Eric ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SEMANTICS;

COGNITION; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0034146113     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0727     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Agre, P. E. (1995). Computational research on interaction and agency. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 1-52.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249-277.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1983a). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983b). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.
5. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Baillargeon, R. (1987). Object permanence in 3.5- and 4.5-month old infants. Developmental Psychology, 23, 655-664.
7. Barnden, J. A. (1994). On the connectionist implementation of analogy and working memory matching. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neutral computation theory: Analogy, metaphor, and reminding (Vol. 3, pp. 327-374). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(4), 577-660.
9. Bassok, M., Chase, V. M., & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Semantic constraints on application of formal rules. Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 99-134.
10. Bickhard, M. & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
11. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115-147.
12. Brooks, L. (1978). Non-analytic concept formation and memory for instances. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 169-211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
14. Chalmers, D. J. (1990). Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong: The simplest refutation. In The Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 340-347). Cambridge, MA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). On the natural selection of reasoning theories. Cognition, 33, 285-313.
16. Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1991). The sound pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
17. Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated action: On human knowledge and computer representations. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
18. Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines: Connectionism, concepts, and representational change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic priming. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-428.
20. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187-276.
21. Dietrich, E. (1990). Computationalism. Social Epistemology, 4(2), 135-154.
22. Dietrich, E. (1994). Thinking computers and the problem of intentionality. In E. Dietrich (Ed.) Thinking computers and virtual persons. San Diego: Academic Press.
23. Dretske, F. (1981). Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford.
24. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179-212.
25. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41(1), 1-63.
26. Fodor, J., & McLaughlin, B. (1990). Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work. Cognition, 35, 183-204.
27. Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28, 3-71.
28. Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205.
29. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
30. Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
31. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structural alignment in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45-56.
32. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
33. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
34. Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
35. Higgins, E.T. (1992). Achieving a 'shared reality' in the communication game: A social action that creates meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 107-131.
36. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13(3), 295-355.
37. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1994). Mental leaps. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
38. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99(3), 480-517.
39. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104(3), 427-466.
40. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
41. Ivry, R. B., & Robertson, L. C. (1998). The two sides of perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
43. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M., & Tabossi, P. (1989). Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantification. Psychological Review, 96(4), 658-673.
44. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Kaplan, A. S., & Medin, D. L. (1997). The coincidence effect in similarity and choice. Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 570-576.
46. Keane, M. T., Ledgeway, T., & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 387-438.
47. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
48. Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans? Journal of Memory and Language, 34(1), 89-109.
49. Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Parasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15(2), 173-218.
50. Klein, M., Shapiro, E., & Kandel, E. R. (1980). Synaptic plasticity and the modulation of the Ca++ current. Journal of Experimental Biology, 89, 117-157.
51. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
52. Koriat, A. (1994). Memory's knowledge of its own knowledge: The accessibility account of the feeling of knowing. In J. Metcalfe & A.P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
54. Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). "What" and "where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 217-266.
55. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211-240.
56. Langacker, R. W. (1986). An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science, 10(1), 1-40.
57. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
59. Markman, A. B. (1999). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 431-467.
61. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification. Psychological Review, 85(3), 207-238.
62. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (Eds.) (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
63. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
64. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1963). GPS: A program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman (Eds.), Computers and thought. R. Oldenbourg, Munich.
65. Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
66. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: General, 115(1), 39-57.
67. Novick, L. R. (1990). Representational transfer in problem solving. Psychological Science, 1(2), 128-132.
68. Palmer, S. E. (1977). Hierarchical structure in perceptual representations. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 441-474.
69. Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.) Cognition and categorization (pp. 259-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Perner, J. F. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
71. Pollack, J. B. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 46(1-2), 77-106.
72. Pollack, J. L. (1994). Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence, 67, 377-407.
73. Reder, L. M. (1996). Implicit memory and metacognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
74. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 435-451.
75. Reed, S. K., & Bolstad, C. A. (1991). Use of examples and procedures in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(4), 753-766.
76. Regier, T. (1996). The human semantic potential. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
77. Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of Proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
78. Ross, B. H. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 371-416.
79. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. Schank, R. C., Kass, A., & Riesbeck, C. K. (1994). Inside case-based explanation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Shannon, C. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois Press.
82. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 644-649.
83. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174.
84. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D.L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
85. Smith, L. B. (1989). From global similarities to kinds of similarities: The construction of dimensions in development. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 146-178) New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
86. Smith, L. B., & Sera, M. D. (1992). A developmental analysis of the polar structure of dimensions. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 99-142.
87. Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 1-74.
88. Smolensky, P. (1991). Connectionism, constituency, and the language of thought. In B. Loewer & G. Rey (Eds.), Meaning in mind: Fodor and his critics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
89. Thelen, E. (1995). Time-scale dynamics and the development of an embodied cognition. In R.F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 69-100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
90. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
91. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 327-352.
92. Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separability and the triangle inequality. Psychological Review, 89(2), 123-154.
93. Van Gelder, T., & Port, R. F. (1995). It's about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder(Eds.), Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
94. Vera, A.H., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Situated action: A symbolic interpretation. Cognitive Science, 17, 7-48.
95. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning structure and content. London: Routledge.
96. Wellman, H. M. (1990). The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
97. Yu, A.C., & Margoliash, D. (1996). Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds. Science, 273, 1871-1875.