New frontiers in cochlear implantation: Acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 187-203

  Mowry, Sarah E ^a   Woodson, Erika ^b   Gantz, Bruce J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Electric and acoustic processing; Hearing preservation; Hybrid

Indexed keywords

DACRON;

AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEARING; HEARING AID; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LOUDNESS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRESERVATION; REVIEW;

COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING; HUMANS; MUSIC; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 82055166170     PISSN: 00306665     EISSN: 15578259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Karsten S., et al. Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing. Otol Neurotol 2010, 31(8):1227-1232.
2. Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. High frequency audiability: benefits for hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 104(1):432-441.
3. Rizer F.M. Post operative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. J Otolaryngol 1988, 98:203-206.
4. Kiefer J., Gstoettner W., Baumgartner W., et al. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004, 124(3):272-280.
5. Hodges A.V., Schloffman J., Balkany T. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1997, 18(2):179-183.
6. Balkany T.J., Connell S.S., Hodges A.V., et al. Conservation of residual acoustic hearing after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006, 27(8):1083-1088.
7. von Ilberg C., Kiefer J., Tillein J., et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999, 61(6):334-340.
8. Ni D., Shepherd R.K., Seldon H.L., et al. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: normal hearing kittens. Hear Res 1992, 62(1):63-81.
9. Xu J., Shepherd R.K., Millard R.E., et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hear Res 1997, 105(1-2):1-29.
10. Gantz B.J., Turner C.W., Gfeller K.E., et al. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustic speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005, 115(5):796-802.
11. Gantz B.J., Turner C.W. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003, 113(10):1726-1730.
12. Roland J.T., Zeitler D.M., Jethanamest D., et al. Evaluation of the short hybrid electrode in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 2008, 29(4):482-488.
13. Gantz B.J., Turner C.W. Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004, 24:344-347.
14. Gantz B.J., Hansen M.R., Turner C.W., et al. Hybrid 10 clinical trial. Audiol Neurootol 2009, 14(Suppl 1):32-38.
15. Lenarz T.A., Stover T., Buechner A., et al. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Audiol Neurootol 2009, 14(Suppl 1):22-31.
16. Reiss L.A., Turner C.W., Erenberg S.R., et al. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007, 8:241-257.
17. Hochmair I., Nopp P., Jolly C., et al. Med-El cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future. Trends Amplif 2006, 10(4):201-220.
18. Helbig S., Baumann U. Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device-a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010, 67:81-87.
19. Gstoettner W.K., Kiefer J., Baumgartner W.D., et al. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004, 124(4):348-352.
20. Kiefer J., Pok M., Adunka O., et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005, 10(3):134-144.
21. Gstoettner W.K., van de Heyning P., O'Connor A.F., et al. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol 2008, 128(9):968-975.
22. Fraysse B., Macias A.R., Sterkers O., et al. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006, 27(5):624-633.
23. Gstoettner W.K., Helbig S., Maier N., et al. Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation. Audiol Neurootol 2006, 11(Suppl 1):49-56.
24. Di Nardo W., Cantore I., Melilo P., et al. Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007, 264(8):855-860.
25. Garcia-Ibanez L., Macias A.R., Morera C., et al. An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode. Acta Otolaryngol 2009, 129(6):651-664.
26. Prentiss S., Sykes K., Staecker H. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol 2010, 21:197-203.
27. Reiss L.A.J., Gantz B.J., Turner C.W. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurotol 2008, 29:160-167.
28. Yao W.N., Turner C.W., Gantz B.J. Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006, 49(5):1085-1090.
29. Puel J.L., Ruel J., Gervais d'Aldin C., et al. Excitotoxicity and repair of cochlear synapses after noise-trauma induced hearing loss. Neuroreport 1998, 22(9):2109-2114.
30. Wang Y., Hirose K., Liberman M.C. Dynamics of noise-induced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002, 3(3):248-268.
31. Firszt J.B., Reeder R.M., Skinner M.W. Restoring hearing and symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and one hearing aid. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008, 45(5):749-767.
32. Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., et al. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004, 115(4):1729-1735.
33. Nelson P., Jin S.H., Carney A.E., et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant uses and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2003, 113(2):961-968.
34. Gantz B.J., Turner C.W., Gfeller K.E. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol 2006, 11(Suppl 1):63-68.
35. Gfeller K.E., Olszewski C., Turner C.W., et al. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2006, 11(Suppl 1):12-15.
36. Gfeller K.E., Turner C.W., Oleson J., et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear 2007, 28(3):412-423.
37. Brockmeier S.J., Peterreins M., Lorens A., et al. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2010, 67:70-80.
38. Boex C., Baud L., Cosendai G., et al. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006, 7(2):110-124.
39. Fu Q.J., Nogaki G., Galvin J.J. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005, 6(2):180-190.
40. Fallon J.B., Irvine D.R., Shepherd R.K. Neural prostheses and brain plasticity. J Neural Eng 2009, 6(6):065008.
41. Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in a soft surgery technique. HNO 1993, 41(7):356-359.
42. James C., Albegger K., Battmer R., et al. Preservation of residual hearing: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005, 125(5):481-491.
43. Skarzynski H., Lorens A., Piotrowska A., et al. Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach. Acta Otolaryngol 2007, 127(1):41-48.
44. Adunka O., Unkelbach M.H., Mack M., et al. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Otolaryngol 2004, 124(7):807-812.
45. Wright C.G., Roland P.S. Temporal bone microdissection for anatomic study of cochlear implant electrodes. Cochlear Implants Int 2005, 6(4):159-168.
46. Briggs R.F., Tykocinski M., Stidham K., et al. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol 2008, 125(8):870-876.
47. Gantz B.J., Dunn C.C., Walker E.A., et al. Bilateral cochlear implants in infants: a new approach-Nucleus Hybrid S12 project. Otol Neurotol 2010, 31:1300-1309.