Hybrid 10 clinical trial: Preliminary results

Audiology and Neurotology

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 32-38

  Gantz, Bruce J ^a,b   Hansen, Marlan R ^a   Turner, Christopher W ^a   Oleson, Jacob J ^a   Reiss, Lina A ^a   Parkinson, Aaron J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Electric acoustic stimulation; Hearing loss; Hearing preservation; Sensorineural; Short electrode

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISEASE DURATION; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOLUNTEER;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; IOWA; PILOT PROJECTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 66249084506     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: 14219700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000206493     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Akaikie H: Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle; in Akaikie H, Petrov VN, Csaki F, et al (eels): Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Budapest, Akademia Kiado, 1973, pp 267-281.
2. Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P: Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing-impaired. Ear Hear 1990;11:40-49.
3. Dillon H: NAL-NL1: A new prescriptive fitting procedure for non-linear hearing aids. Hear J 1999;52:10-16.
4. Fraysse B, Ramos A, Sterkers O, et al: Residual hearing conservation and electro-acoustic stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:624-633.
5. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1726-1730.
6. Gantz BJ, Turner CW: Combining acoustic and electric speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngologica 2004;24:344-347.
7. Gantz BJ, Turner CW, Gfeller KE: Acoustic plus electric speech processing: results of a multi- center clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11 (suppl l):63-68.
8. Gantz BJ, Turner CW, Gfeller KE, Lewder MW: Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngo-scope 2005;115:796-802.
9. Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS: Multivariate predictors of au- diological success with cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;48:153-167.
10. Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Turner CW, Gantz B: Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2006;ll(suppl 1):12-15.
11. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O: Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngologica 2004; 124:348-352.
12. Hogan CA, Turner CW: High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:432-441.
13. Liberman MC, Dodds LW: Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Ste- reocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 1984;6:55-74.
14. Peterson FE, Lehiste I: Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Dis 1962;27:62-70.
15. Qin MK, Oxenham AJ: Effects of simulated co-chlear implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;114:446-454.
16. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz B: Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otol 2007;8:241-257.
17. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ: Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 1999;20:445-452.
18. Schmiedt RA, Lang H, Okamura HO, Schulte BA: Effects of furosemide applied chronically to the round window: a model of metabolic presbyacusis. J NeuroSci 2002;22:9643-9650.
19. Turner CW, Gantz BJ: Preservation of residual acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation. Int Congr Ser 2004;1273:243-246.
20. Turner CW, Gantz BJ: Combined acoustic and electric hearing for severe high-frequency hearing loss. Audiol Today 2005;17:14-15.
21. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A: Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1729-1735.
22. Von Ilberg C, Keifer J, Tillein J, et al: Electro- acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;61:334-340.