An evaluation of the preservation of residual hearing with the Nucleus® Contour Advance™ electrode

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 129, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 651-664

  Garcia Ibanez, Luis ^a   MacIas, Angel Ramos ^b   Morera, Constantino ^c   Rodriguez, Manuel Manrique ^d   Szyfter, Witold ^e   Skarszynski, Henryk ^f   Emamdjomeh, Hessam ^g   Baumgartner, Wolf Dieter ^h  

^a Instituto de Otologia Garcia Ibanez   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO INSULAR DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA FE   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^e POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^f INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

^g IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^h Universitätsklink für HNO Kranheiten   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Preservation; Residual hearing; Soft surgery

Indexed keywords

HYALURONIC ACID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTRODE; HEARING; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; X RAY ANALYSIS; COCHLEA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING LOSS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67650318960     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480802369278     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, et al. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;/125:/596-606.
2. Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, et al. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study. Am J Otol 1998;/19:/591-7. (Pubitemid 28409413)
3. Fraysse B, Ramos-Macias A, Sterkers O, Ramsden R, Lenarz T, Deguine O, et al. Combined electro-acoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2006;/27:/624-33.
4. James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, Burdo S, Deggouj N, Deguine O, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;/ 125:/481-91.
5. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;/124:/ 348-352
6. Seeber B, Baumann U, Fastl H. Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;/16:/1698-709.
7. Ruh S, Battmer R, Strauss-Schier A, Lenarz T. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing.] Laryngorhinootologie 1997;76:347-350 (in German). (Pubitemid 27339205)
8. Cowan RS, Del Dot J, Barker EJ, Sarant JZ, Pegg P, Dettmann S, et al. Speech perception results for children with implants with different levels of preoperative residual hearing. Am J Otol 1997;/18(Suppl 6):/125-6.
9. Mul̈ler-Deile J, Rudert H, Brademann G, Frese K. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?] Laryngorhinootologie 1998;77:136-143 (in German).
10. Copeland BJ, Pillsbury HC 3rd. Cochlear implantation for the treatment of deafness. Annu Rev Med 2004;/55:/157-67.
11. Lehnhardt E. [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique.] HNO 1993;41:356-359 (in German).
12. Lehnhardt E, Laszig R. Specific surgical aspects of cochlear implant- soft surgery. In: Hochmair DE, Soyer IJ, Hochmair E, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna: Manz, 1994:228-229
13. Kempf HG, Buc̈hner A, Stov̈er T. [Cochlear implants in adults: indications and realization. Special cases and technical parameters of the implantation systems.] HNO 2003;51:663-675 (in German).
14. Hodges A, Schloffman J, Balkany T. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1997;/18:/179-83.
15. Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, Arndt PL, Cosgriff A, Ebinger K. The nucleus 24 contour cochlear implant system: adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002;/23(Suppl 1):/41S-8S.
16. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, D'Haese P, Walkowiak A, Piotrowska A, Sliwa L, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002;/64:/247-53.
17. Gantz B, Turner C, Gfeller K, Lowder M. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;/115:/796-802.
18. Gantz B, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003;/113:/1726-30.
19. Xu J, Xu S, Cohen L, Clark G. Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 2000;/21:/ 49-56.
20. Tykocinski M, Cohen LT, Pyman B, Roland T, Treaba C, Palamara J, et al. Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays. Am J Otol 2000;/21:/205-11.