Evaluation of the short hybrid electrode in human temporal bones

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 482-488

  Roland Jr , J Thomas ^a,b   Zeitler, Daniel M ^a   Jethanamest, Daniel ^a   Huang, Tina C ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electroacoustic hearing; Hybrid electrode; Temporal bone

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; BASILAR MEMBRANE; BONE INJURY; CADAVER; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTRODE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIRAL LAMINA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEMPORAL BONE; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; TEMPORAL BONE;

EID: 47249107252     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816845eb     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ching T-C, Dillon H, Byrne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:1128-40.
2. Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:432-41.
3. Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:1150-63.
4. Fu Q, Shannon RV, Wang X. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electrical hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:3586-96.
5. Hodges AV, Schloffman J, Balkany T. Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1997;18:179-83.
6. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, D'Haese P, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002;64:247-53.
7. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999; 61:334-40.
8. Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, et al. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:272-80.
9. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W, et al. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:348-52.
10. Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O, et al. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:134-44.
11. Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, et al. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1237-41.
12. Adunka O, Unkelbach MH, Mack M, et al. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes traumatocochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124:807-12.
13. Adunka O,Gstoettner W, HambekM, et al. Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2004;66:306-12.
14. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1726-30.
15. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11: S63-8.
16. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, et al. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1729-35.
17. Gantz BJ, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124:344-7.
18. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115: 796-802.
19. JamesC,AlbeggerK, BattmerR,etal. Preservation ofresidual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125:481-91.
20. Roland JT. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1325-39.
21. Greenwood DD. A cochlear frequency position function for several species: 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-605.