Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 624-633

  Fraysse, Bernard ^a   Macías, Ángel Ramos ^b   Sterkers, Olivier ^c   Burdo, Sandro ^d   Ramsden, Richard ^e   Deguine, Olivier ^a   Klenzner, Thomas ^f   Lenarz, Thomas ^g   Rodriguez, Manuel Manrique ^h   Von Wallenberg, Ernst ⁱ   James, Chris ^a,i  

^a CHU PURPAN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^c BEAUJON HOSPITAL   (France)

^d OSPEDALE DI CIRCOLO   (Italy)

^e MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^g HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

ⁱ Cochlear AG ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Electroacoustic stimulation; Hearing aids; Soft surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EUROPE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STUDENT T TEST;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746822371     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000226289.04048.0f     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Parkinson AJ, Arcaroli J, Staller SJ, Arndt PL, Cosgriff A, Ebinger K. The Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implant system: Adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002;23:41S-48S.
2. Ching TY, Psarros C, Hill M, Dillon H, Incerti P. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? Ear Hear 2001;22:365-80.
3. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: Theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear 2004;25:310-35.
4. Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, Blamey P. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol 1997;18:S140-1.
5. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 2004;25:9-21.
6. Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:1351-61.
7. von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, Tillein J, et al. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1999;61:334-40.
8. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1726-30.
9. Lehnhardt E, Laszig R. Specific surgical aspects of cochlear implant Y soft surgery. In: Hochmair Desoyer I, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in Cochlear Implants. Wien: Manz, 1994:228-9.
10. Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, Pok SM, Tillein J, Ye Q, von Ilberg C. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:272-80.
11. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner WD, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:348-52.
12. Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, et al. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification. Am J Otol 1998;19:591-7.
13. Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:432-42.
14. Vickers DA, Moore BC, Baer T. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:1164-75.
15. Baer T, Moore BCJ, Kluk K. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112:1133-744.
16. Summers V. Do tests for cochlear dead regions provide important information for fitting hearing aids? J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1420-3.
17. James CJ, Albegger K, Battmer R, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:481-91.
18. Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM. Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 2000;21:49-56.
19. Calmels MN, Fraysse B, Deguine O, et al. Intra-operative "live" fluoroscopy for the accurate positioning of intracochlear electrodes - a feasibility study. Presented at the 7th European Symposium of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation, Geneva, Switzerland, May 2-5, 2004 (abstr).
20. Cornelisse LE, Seewald RC, Jamieson DG. The input/output (i/o) formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:1854-64.
21. Boothroyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short-term Learning (Internal Report RCI 10). New York: City University of New York, 1985.
22. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1996;1:293-306.
23. Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:163-72.
24. Häussler R. Advances in stapes surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 2000;79:S95-139 [in German].
25. Paprocki A, Biskup B, Kozaowska K, Kuniszyk A, Bien D, Niemczyk K. The topographical anatomy of the round window and related structures for the purpose of cochlear implant surgery. Folia Morphol 2004;63:309-12.
26. Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, Lehnert T, Gstoettner W. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1237-41.