Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 344-347

  Gantz, Bruce J ^a,c   Turner, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electrical and acoustic hearing; Hybrid stimulation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FOLLOW UP; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INNER EAR; PERCEPTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, HIGH-FREQUENCY; HUMANS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 2942719113     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480410016423     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. Understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health (2 vols). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000: 28-7.
2. Ching T, Dillon H, Bryne D. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 1128-40.
3. Hogan C, Turner C. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 432-41.
4. Gantz BJ, Tyler RS, Rubinstein JT, Wolaver A, Lowder M, Abbas P, et al. Binaural cochlear implants placed during the same operation. Otol Neurootol 2002; 23: 169-80.
5. Tomblin JB, Spencer L, Flock S, Tyler R, Gantz B. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 1999; 42: 497-511.
6. Svirsky M, Robbins A, Iler Kirk K, Pisoni D, Miyamoto R. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 2000; 11: 153-8.
7. Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 321-32.
8. Von Ilberg C, Keifer J, Tillein J, Pfenningdorff T, Hartmann R, Sturzebecher E, et al. Electro-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 61: 334-40.
9. Ni D, Shephard RK, Seldon HL, Xu S, Clark GM, Millard RE. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. 1. Normal hearing kittens. Hear Res 1992; 62: 62-81.
10. Xu S, Shephard RK, Millard RE, Clark GM. Chronic stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study. Hear Res 1997; 105: 1-29.
11. Peterson G, Barney H. Control methods used in a study of vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1952; 24: 175-84.
12. Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Wygonski J. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 2467-76.
13. Gantz BJ, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electric hearing. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1726-30.
14. Araki S, Kawano A, Seldon L, Shepard RK, Funasaka S, Clark GM. Effects of chronic electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion neuron survival and size in deafened kittens. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 687-95.
15. Leake PA, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats. Hear Res 1999; 54: 251-71.