A model of human-robot trust: Theoretical model development

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1432-1436

  Sanders, Tracy ^a   Oleson, Kristin E ^a   Billings, D R ^a   Chen, Jessie Y C ^b   Hancock, P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN OPERATOR; HUMAN-ROBOT-TEAM; META-ANALYSIS; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; ROAD-MAPS; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS; THEORETICAL MODELS;

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 81855177094     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551298     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Selfcategorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2. Adams, B. D., Bruyn, L. E., Houde, S., & Angelopoulos, P. (2003). Trust in automated systems literature review. DRDC Toronto No. CR-2003-096.
3. Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J., Kim, E.S., & Scassellati, B. (2008). The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Community. Munich, Germany.
4. Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust, and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 332-345.
5. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robots, 1, 71-81.
6. Biros, D. P., Daly, M., & Gunsch, G. (2004). The influence of task load and automation trust on deception detection. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 173-189. (Pubitemid 39038747)
7. Chen, J. Y. C., Barnes, M. J., & Harper-Sciarini, M. (2010). Supervisory control of multiple robots: Human-performance issues and user-interface design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, PP Issue 99, 1-20.
8. Chen, J. Y. C., & Terrence, P. I. (2009). Effects of imperfect automation and individual differences on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment. Ergonomics, 52(8), 907-920.
9. Cosenzo, K. A., Barnes, M., Parasuraman, R., & Novak, A. (2006). Implementation of automation for control of robotic systems (ARLTechnical Report 3808). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
10. Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (2004). The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 85-116. (Pubitemid 39216605)
11. Davids, A. (2002). Urban search and rescue robots: From tragedy to technology. IEEE March/April, 81-83.
12. Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of humanrobot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 679-704. (Pubitemid 47056835)
13. de Ruyter, B., Saini, P. Markopoulous, P., & van Breeman, A. (2005). Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in robotic interface in the home. Interacting with Computers, 17(5), 522-541. (Pubitemid 41101045)
14. De Santis, A., Siciliano, B., De Luca, A., & Bicchi, A. (2008). Review: An atlas of physical human-robot interaction. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 43, 253-270. (Pubitemid 351163313)
15. Desai, M. (2007). Sliding scale autonomy and trust in human-robot interaction (Master's thesis). University of Massachusetts Lowell.
16. Drury, J. L., Riek, L., & Rackliffe, N. (2006). A decomposition of UAVrelated situation awareness. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot Interaction. New York, NY, USA, 88-94.
17. Duffy, B. (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, (42), 177-190.
18. Evers, V., Maldanado, H., Brodecki, T., & Hinds, P. (2008). Group selfconstructual: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI. Proceedings in the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 255-262.
19. Fallon, C. K., Bustamonte, E. A., Ely, K. M. R., & Bliss, J. P. (2005). Improving user trust with a likelihood alarm display. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Augmented Cognition, Las Vegas, NV.
20. Fong T., Nourbakhsh I., Dautenhahn K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143-166
21. Fox, J.E. (1996). The effects of information accuracy on user trust and compliance. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems: common ground. New York, NY.
22. Freedy, A., de Visser, E., Weltman, G., & Coeyman, N. (2007). Measurements of trust in human-robot collaboration. Collaborative Technologies and Systems, 106-114.
23. Groom, V., & Nass, C. (2007). Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human-robot teams. Interaction Studies, 8(3), 483-5000.
24. Hancock, P.A., Billings, D. R., Oleson, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., De Visser, E., & Parasuraman, R. (2011, in review). A meta-analysis of factors impacting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors.
25. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., & Evers, V. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the Almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361-375.
26. Hudlicka, E., Becker-Asano, C., Payr, S., Fischer, K., Ventura, R., Leiti, I., & von Scheve, C. (2009). Social interaction with robots and agents: Where do we stand, where do we go? Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops (pp 1-6). Amsterdam.
27. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
28. Khan, Z. (1998). Attitudes towards intelligent service robots (Technical Report No. TRITA-NA-P9821). Stockholm, Sweden: Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology.
29. Kidd, C. D. (2003). Sociable robots: The role of presence and task in humanrobot interaction (Master's thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
30. Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2004). Effect of a robot on user perceptions. Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan.
31. Koay, K. L, Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S. N., & Walters, M. L. (2005). Empirical results from using a comfort level device in human-robot interaction studies. Proceedings from Human-Robot Interaction, Lake City, Utah.
32. LeBlanc, D. J. (2007). Increasing operator trust through knowledge. (Master's thesis). Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada.
33. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50-80. (Pubitemid 44490367)
34. Li, D., Rau, P., & Li, Y. (2010). A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robots, 2, 175-186.
35. Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., & Cnossen, M. (2010). Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: Design and evaluation of social behaviors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(6), 386-397.
36. Lussier, B., Gallien, M., & Guiochet, J. (2007). Fault tolerant planning for critical robots. Proceedings of the 37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks.
37. Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007). Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 277-301.
38. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
39. Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (2008). Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors, 50(2), 194-210. (Pubitemid 351744366)
40. Nass, C., Fogg, B.J., & Moon, Y. (1996). Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 669-678. (Pubitemid 126374567)
41. Nielsen, C. W., & Bruemmer, D. J. (2007). Hiding the system from the user: Moving from complex mental models to elegant metaphors. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 756-761). Jeju Island, Korea.
42. Olsen, D. R., & Goodrich, M. A. (2003). Metrics for evaluating human-robot interactions. Proceedings of NIST Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, Washington, DC, USA.
43. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39(2), 230-253.
44. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T., & Wickens, C. (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 140-160.
45. Patrick, A. (2002). Privacy, trust, agents, and users: A review of human factors issues associated with building trustworthy software agents. Human Factors of Trustworthy Agents, 1(6), 1-12.
46. Rau, P. L., Li, Y., & Li, D. (2009). Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 587-595.
47. Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95-112.
48. Ross, J.M. (2008). Moderators of trust and reliance across multiple decision aids. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
49. Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M. V., & Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 146-155. (Pubitemid 43118502)
50. Sheridan, T. B. (2002). Humans and automation: System design and research issues. Santa Monica, CA: Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated.
51. Steinfeld, A. Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., & Goodrich, M. (2006). Common metrics for human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 33-40). Salt Lake City, Utah. (Pubitemid 44032386)
52. Tenney, Y. J., Rogers, W. H., & Pew, R. W. (1998). Pilot opinions of cockpit automation issues. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(2), 103-120.
53. Wang, L., Rau, P. L., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., & Hinds, P. (2010). When in Rome: The role of culture and context in adherence to robot recommendations. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 359-366). Osaka, Japan.
54. Weber, J. (2005). Helpless machines and true loving care givers: A feminist critique of recent trends in human robot interaction. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 3(4), 209-218.
55. Weiss, A., Bernhaupt, R., Lankes, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2009). The USUS evaluation framework for human-robot interaction. AISB2009: Proceedings of the Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction. Edinburgh, Scotland.