Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration

Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, CTS

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 106-114

  Freedy, Amos ^a   DeVisser, Ewart ^a   Weltman, Gershon ^a   Coeyman, Nicole ^b  

^a Perceptronics Solutions Inc

^b STTC ^*

Author keywords

Human robot collaboration; Human robot performance modeling; Measurement of trust; Mixed initiative systems

Indexed keywords

ROBOTICS;

COLLABORATIVE TASKS; CONTROL ENVIRONMENTS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; HUMAN ROBOT COLLABORATION; HUMAN-ROBOT PERFORMANCE MODELING; MIXED-INITIATIVE SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS; PERFORMANCE ATTRIBUTES; PERFORMANCE MODELS; PRACTICAL MEASURES; SIMULATION ENVIRONMENTS;

ROBOTS;

EID: 57849146110     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CTS.2007.4621745     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Albus, J.S. "Metrics and performance: Measures for intelligent unmanned ground vehicles," In MIS Proceedings.
2. Barnes, M., Parasuraman, R. & Cosenzo, K. (In press). Adaptive automation for robotic military systems, Technical Report, NATO HFM, 2002
3. Clough, B.T. "Metrics, schmetrics! How the heck do you determine a UAV's autonomy anyway?" AFB in MIS Proceedings. Air Force Research Lab, Wright Patterson, 2002
4. DeVisser, E., Freedy, A., Freedy, E., Weltman, G., & Parasuraman, R. "A comprehensive methodology for assessing human-robot team" performance for use in training and simulation," In Proceedings of the 50th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Conference, (In press).
5. Drewes, P. "Lessons learned in group robotic command and control," Unmanned Systems Conference, Orlando, FL, 2002
6. Endsley, M.R. "Direct measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT," In Endsley, M. R., Garland, D. J. (Eds.) Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003
7. Fallon, C. K. "Improving user trust with a likelihood alarm display," Proceedings of the 1 st Conference on Augmented Cognition, Las Vegas, NV, 2005
8. Freedy, A., McDonough, J.G., Freedy, E.T., Jacobs, R., Thayer, S.M., and Weltman, G. "A mixed initiative team performance assessment system (MITPAS) for use in training and operational environments," SBIR Phase I Final Report, Contract No. N61339-04-C-0020, Perceptronics Solutions, 2004
9. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. "Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems," Ergonomics, 35, 1992, pp 1243-1270.
10. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. "Trust, self-confidence, and adaptation to automation," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 1994. pp 153-184.
11. Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. "Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance." Human Factors, 46 (1), 2004, pp 50-80.
12. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. "Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse," Human Factors, 39(2), 1997, pp 230-253.
13. Parasuraman, R., Galster, S., Squire, P., Furukawa, H., & Miller, C. "A flexible delegation-type interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple robots: Empirical studies with RoboFlag," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part A. Systems and Humans, 35, 2005, pp 481-493.
14. Rovira, E., McGarry, K., Parasuraman, R. "Effects of imperfect automation on decision-making in a simulated command and control task," Human Factors, (In press)
15. Sheridan, T., & Parasuraman, R. "Humanautomation interaction," Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 1, 2006, 89-129.
16. Smith- Jentsch, K.A, Johnson, J.H. and Payne, S.C. "Measuring team related expertise in complex environments," In J.A. Cannon-Bowers and E. Salas (Eds.), Making Decisions Under Stress. American Psychological Association, WDC, 1998.
17. Van Dongen, K., & Van Maanen, P. "Designing for dynamic task allocation," Paper presented at the 7th International NDM Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005