Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI

HRI 2008 - Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Living with Robots

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 255-262

  Evers, Vanessa ^a   Maldonado, Heidy C ^b   Brodecki, Talia L ^b   Hinds, Pamela J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross cultural design; Human robot collaboration

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; CULTURAL BACKGROUNDS; DIVERSE CULTURES; HUMAN-HUMAN INTERACTIONS; HUMAN-ROBOT COLLABORATION; INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCE; NATIONAL CULTURES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MACHINE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 67650652087     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1349822.1349856     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Bailenson, J.N. and Yee, N. A. Longitudinal Study of Task Performance, Head Movements, Subjective Reports, Simulator Sickness, and Transformed Social Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 6 (2006).
2. Bartneck, C. eMuu-an emotional embodied character for the ambient intelligent home. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2002.
3. Breazeal, C., & Scassellati, B. How to build robots that make friends and influence people. Paper presented at the 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS-99), Kyonjiu, Korea, 1999.
4. Breazeal, C. and Scassellati, B. Infant-like social interactions between a robot and a human caretaker. Adaptive Behaviour, 8, (2000), 49-74.
5. Brewer, M. and Chen, Y.R. Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review. 114, 1, (2007), 133-151.
6. Brooks, R. Humanoid robots. Communications of the ACM, 45, 3, (2002), 33-38
7. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. The relational- interdependent self-construal and relationships. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 , (2000), 791-808. 121, 355-370.
8. Dautenhahn, K. Robots as social actors: AURORA and the case of autism. Proceedings of the Third International Cognitive Technology Conference. San Francisco, CA, 1999.
9. Dautenhahn, K., and Werry, I. A quantitative technique for analysing robot-human interactions, in: Proc. of the International Conf. on Intelligent Robotic Systems. (2002)
10. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, (1969), 49- 98.
11. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I. and Dautenhahn K. A survey of socially interactive robots: concepts, design, and applications. Technical Report No. CMU-RI-TR-02-29, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, (2002).
12. Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C. and Gemperle, F. Assistive robots and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Human Computer Interaction, 19, (2004), 25-39.
13. Fujita, M. Aibo: towards the era of digital creatures. Int. J. Robot. Res., 20, (2001) 781-794.
14. de Groot, J.J.M. The Religious System of China, (1902, reprinted 1989). Reprinted by Kessinger publishing in 2003
15. Hinds, P., Roberts, T., and Jones, H. Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task. Human Computer Interaction, 19, 1&2, (2004), 151-181.
16. Hirai, K., Hirose, M., Haikawa, Y., and Takenaka, T.. The development of Honda humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2, (1998), 1321-1326, Leuven, Belgium.
17. Hofstede, G. Cultures and Organizations. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Book Company Europe, 1991.
18. Hong, Y., Morris, M., Chiu, C., and Bennet-Martinez, V. Multicultural Minds: A Dynamic Constructivist Approach to Culture and Cognition. American Psychologist, 55, (2000), 709-720.
19. Hornyak, T. Seal of approval, Japan Inc.Magazine Online, June 2002. http://www.japaninc.net/article.php? articleID=819 (accessed 25 August 2007).
20. Iyengar, S. & Lepper, M. Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 3, (1999), 349-366
21. Katagiri, Y., Nass, C. and Takeuchi, Y.: Cross-Cultural Studies of the Computers are Social Actors Paradigm: The Case of Reciprocity. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2001. (2001),1558-1562.
22. Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., and Kim, S. R. 2006. Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 10 (Oct. 2006)
23. Lohse et al. What can I do for you? Appearance and application of robots. In Proceedings of The Reign of Catz and Dogz? The role of virtual creatures in a computerized society, Symposium at AISB (2007).
24. MacDorman, K. F. Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In Proceedings of the Conference on Cognitive Science Workshop n Android Science (2006).
25. Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, (1991), 224-253.
26. Matsumoto, D. Culture and psychology. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1996.
27. Morling, B, Kitayama, S. and Miyamoto, Y. Cultural Practices Emphasize Influence in the United States and Adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 8 (2002), 311-323.
28. Nakane, C. In Kodansha encyclopedia of Japan. 3, 1983, 259-260. Tokyo: Kodansha
29. Pollack, M. Intelligent Technology for an Aging Population: The Use of AI to Assist Elderly with Cognitive Impairment. AI Magazine, Summer (2005).
30. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. The media equation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
31. Remland, M.S., Jones, T. S., and Brinkman, H. Proxemic and haptic behavior in three European countries. J. of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 4, (1991), 215-232.
32. de Ruyter, B., Saini, P., Markopoulos., P. and Van Breemen, A.J.N. Assessing the Effects of Building Social Intelligence in a Robotic Interface for the Home. Interacting with Computers, 17, 5, (2005), 522-541.
33. Schodt, F. L. Inside the Robot Kingdom - Japan, Mechatronics, and Coming Robotopia. Tokyo, New York: Kodansha, 1988.
34. Segall, M., Dasen, P., Berry, J., and Poortinga, Y. Human behavior in global perspective. New York: Pergamon, 1990.
35. Shinozawa, K., Reeves, B., Wise, K., Lim, S., and Maldonado, H. Robots as New Media: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social and Cognitive Responses to Robotic and On-Screen Agents. Conference of the Int'l Communication Assoc, San Diego, 2003, 998-1002.
36. Simmons, R., and Nourbakhsh, I. Social robots project, Carnegie Mellon University, 2002. Retrieved 25 August, 2007, from http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/- social/
37. Spencer-Oatey H. Rapport management: basic concepts and issues. In Spencer-Oatey H (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Relations in Talk Across Cultures, London: Continuum, 2000, 11-46
38. Stubbs, K., Hinds, P., & Wettergreen, D. Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study with a remote autonomous explorer. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2007, 42-50.
39. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics. HarperCollins, NY, 1996.
40. Torrey, C., Powers, A., Marge, M., Fussell, S. R., and Kiesler, S. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue in information exchange and social relations. Proceedings of HRI 2006. Salt Lake City, UT, 2006.
41. Triandis, H. C. and Gelfand, M. J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, (1998) 118-128.
42. Woods et al. Methodological issues in HRI: A comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach direction trials. In Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot an Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2006)