Fitness landscapes: An alternative theory for the dominance of mutation

Genetics

Volumn 189, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 923-937

  Manna, Federico ^a   Martin, Guillaume ^b   Lenormand, Thomas ^a  

^a CENTRE D ECOLOGIE FONCTIONNELLE ET EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^b INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DOMINANCE MUTATION; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC MODEL; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC FITNESS LANDSCAPE MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, RECESSIVE; GENETIC FITNESS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SEQUENCE DELETION;

EID: 81255211332     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.132944     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Agrawal, A. F., 2009 Spatial heterogeneity and the evolution of sex in diploids. Am. Nat. 174: S54-S70.
2. Agrawal, A. F., and M. C. Whitlock, 2011 Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data. Genetics 187: 553-566.
3. Bagheri, H., and G. Wagner, 2004 Evolution of dominance in metabolic pathways. Genetics 168: 1713-1735.
4. Barton, N. H., 2001 The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 10: 551-568.
5. Bataillon, T., and M. Kirkpatrick, 2000 Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: size does matter. Genet. Res. 75: 75-81.
6. Bourguet, D., 1999 The evolution of dominance. Heredity 83: 1-4.
7. Bourguet, D., M. Prout, and M. Raymond, 1996 Dominance of insecticide resistance presents a plastic response. Genetics 143: 407-416.
8. Bürger, R., and H. Bagheri, 2008 Dominance and its evolution, pp. 945-952 in Encyclopedia of Ecology, edited by J. Se and F. Bd. Elsevier, Oxford.
9. Cailleau, A., P.-O. Cheptou, and T. Lenormand, 2010 Ploidy and the evolution of endosperm of flowering plants. Genetics 184: 439-453.
10. Chang, A. S., and M. A. F. Noor, 2010 Epistasis modifies the dominance of loci causing hybrid male sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura species group. Evolution 64: 253-260.
11. Charlesworth, B., 1979 Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance. Nature 278: 848-849.
12. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth, 1998 Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations. Genetica 103: 3-19.
13. Charlesworth, D., and J. H. Willis, 2009 Fundamental concepts in genetics: the genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10: 783-796.
14. Chavarrias, D., C. Lopez-Fanjul, and A. Garcia-Dorado, 2001 The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158: 681-693.
15. Chevin, L. M., G. Martin, and T. Lenormand, 2010 Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation: restricted pleiotropy, heterogeneous mutation and parallel evolution. Evolution 64: 3213-3231.
16. Crow, J., 1987 Muller, Dobzhansky, and overdominance. J. Hist. Biol. 20: 351-380.
17. de Visser, J., J. Hermisson, G. P. Wagner, L. A. Meyers, H. C. Bagheri et al., 2003 Perspective: evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57: 1959-1972.
18. Dykhuizen, D. E., A. M. Dean, and D. L. Hartl, 1987 Metabolic flux and fitness. Genetics 115: 25-31.
19. Epinat, G., and T. Lenormand, 2009 The evolution of assortative mating and selfing with in-and outbreeding depression. Evolution 63: 2047-2060.
20. Fisher, R. A., 1928 The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. Am. Nat. 62: 115-126.
21. Fry, D. J., and V. S. Nuzhdin, 2003 Dominance of mutations affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 163: 1357-1364.
22. Fry, J. D., 2004 How common are overdominant mutations? Genetics 167: 1031-1032.
23. Fudala, A., and R. Korona, 2009 Low frequency of mutations with strongly deleterious but nonlethal fitness effects. Evolution 63: 2164-2171.
24. Garcia-Dorado, A., and A. Caballero, 2000 On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations. Genetics 155: 1991-2001.
25. Gavrilets, S., 1997 Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 307-312.
26. Gemmell, N., and J. Slate, 2006 Heterozygote advantage for fecundity. PLoS ONE 1: e125.
27. Gurevitch, J., and L. V. Hedges, 1999 Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80: 1142-1149.
28. Haldane, J. B. S., 1932 The Causes of Evolution. Harper, New York.
29. Hastings, A., and C. L. Hom, 1989 Pleiotropic stabilizing selection limits the number of polymorphic loci to at most the number of characters. Genetics 122: 459-463.
30. Houle, D., K. A. Hughes, S. Assimacopoulos, and B. Charlesworth, 1997 The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. II. Dominance of mutations with effects on life-history traits. Genet. Res. 70: 27-34.
31. Hurst, L. D., and J. P. Randerson, 2000 Dosage, deletions and dominance: simple models of the evolution of gene expression. J. Theor. Biol. 205: 641-647.
32. Kacser, H., and J. A. Burns, 1981 The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97: 639-666.
33. Kondrashov, F. A., and E. V. Koonin, 2004 A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications. Trends Genet. 20: 287-291.
34. Lande, R., 1976 Natural-selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314-334.
35. Levins, R., 1966 The strategy of model building in population biology. Am. Sci. 54: 421-431.
36. Llaurens, V., S. Billiard, V. Castric, and X. Vekemans, 2009 Evolution of dominance in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems. I. Genetic load and coevolution of levels of dominance in pollen and pistil. Evolution 63: 2427-2437.
37. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland.
38. Lynch, M., J. Blanchard, D. Houle, T. Kibota, S. Schultz et al., 1999 Perspective: spontaneous deleterious mutation. Evolution 53: 645-663.
39. Mackay, T. F. C., F. R. Lyman, and M. S. Jackson, 1992 Effects of P elements insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 130: 315-332.
40. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand, 2006a The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in the light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 60: 2413-2427.
41. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand, 2006b A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60: 893-907.
42. Martin, G., S. F. Elena, and T. Lenormand, 2007 Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat. Genet. 39: 555-560.
43. Mayo, O., and R. Burger, 1997 The evolution of dominance: a theory whose time has passed? Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 72: 97-110.
44. Mitchell-Olds, T., 1995 Interval mapping of viability loci causing heterosis in Arabidopsis. Genetics 140: 1105-1109.
45. Motulsky, A., 2010 Formal genetics of humans: mode of inheritance, pp. 165-210 in Human Genetics, edited by M. Speicher, S. Antonarakis, and A. Motulsky. Springer, Berlin.
46. Ohnishi, O., 1977a Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonateinduced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. Recessive lethal mutations. Genetics 87: 519-527.
47. Ohnishi, O., 1977b Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics 87: 529-545.
48. Ohnishi, O., 1977c Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Heterozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics 87: 547-556.
49. Omholt, S., E. Plahte, L. Oyehaug, and K. Xiang, 2000 Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis. Genetics 155: 969-980.
50. Orr, H. A., 1991 A test of fisher theory of dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11413-11415.
51. Orr, H. A., and S. P. Otto, 1994 Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation? Genetics 136: 1475-1480.
52. Orr, H. A., and D. C. Presgraves, 2000 Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules. Bioessays 22: 1085-1094.
53. Orzack, S. H., and E. Sober, 1993 A critical assessment of Levins' "The Strategy of Model Building (1966)". Q. Rev. Biol. 68: 533-546.
54. Otto, S. P., 2003 The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex. Genetics 164: 1099-1118.
55. Otto, S. P., and D. Bourguet, 1999 Dominance in patchy environments. Am. Nat. 153: 561-574.
56. Otto, S. P., and D. B. Goldstein, 1992 Recombination and the evolution of diploidy. Genetics 131: 745-751.
57. Peters, A. D., D. L. Halligan, M. C. Whitlock, and P. D. Keightley, 2003 Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 165: 589-599.
58. Phadnis, N., and J. D. Fry, 2005 Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance. Genetics 171: 385-392.
59. Provine, W., 1986 Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
60. Roze, D., and F. Rousset, 2005 Inbreeding depression and the evolution of dispersal rates: a multilocus model. Am. Nat. 166: 708-721.
61. Schoen, D. J., and J. W. Busch, 2009 The evolution of dominance in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems. ii. Mate availability and recombination. Evolution 63: 2099-2113.
62. Simmons, M. J., and J. F. Crow, 1977 Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11: 49-78.
63. Steinmetz, L. M., C. Scharfe, A. M. Deutschbauer, D. Mokranjac, Z. S. Herman et al., 2002 Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast. Nat. Genet. 31: 400-404.
64. Szafraniec, K., D. M. Wloch, P. Sliwa, R. H. Borts, and R. Korona, 2003 Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet. Res. 82: 19-31.
65. Tenaillon, O., O. K. Silander, J. P. Uzan, and L. Chao, 2007 Quantifying organismal complexity using a population genetic approach. PLoS ONE 2: e217.
66. Vassilieva, L. L., A. M. Hook, and M. Lynch, 2000 The fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 54: 1234-1246.
67. Welch, J. J., and D. Waxman, 2003 Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution 57: 1723-1734.
68. Whitlock, M. C., 2002 Selection, load and inbreeding depression in a large metapopullation. Genetics 160: 1191-1202.
69. Wright, S., 1929 Fisher's theory of dominance. Am. Nat. 63: 274-279.
70. Wright, S., 1934 Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am. Nat. 67: 24-53.
71. Wright, S., 1935 The analysis of variance and the correlations between relatives with respect to deviations from an optimum. J. Genet. 30: 243-256.
72. Zeyl, C., T. Vanderford, and M. Carter, 2003 An evolutionary advantage of haploidy in large yeast populations. Science 299: 555-558.