Low frequency of mutations with strongly deleterious but nonlethal fitness effects

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2164-2171

  Fudala, Angelina ^a   Korona, Ryszard ^a  

^a JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Gene deletion; Growth rate; Protein complex; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BIMODAL ASSOCIATION; COMPLEXATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; GENE EXPRESSION; GROWTH RATE; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN; YEAST;

ARTICLE; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE DELETION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GENE DELETION; GENOME, FUNGAL; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 68149142374     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00713.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Blanc, V., and J. Adams. 2003. Evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: identification of mutations increasing fitness in laboratory populations. Genetics 165 : 975 983.
2. Brown, J., G. Sherlock, C. Myers, N. Burrows, C. Deng, H. Wu, K. McCann, O. Troyanskaya, and J. Brown. 2006. Global analysis of gene function in yeast by quantitative phenotypic profiling. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2 : 2006.0001.
3. Burch, C. L., S. Guyader, D. Samarov, and H. Shen. 2007. Experimental estimate of the abundance and effects of nearly neutral mutations in the RNA virus phi 6. Genetics 176 : 467 476.
4. Davies, E., A. Peters, and P. Keightley. 1999. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 285 : 1748 1751.
5. Denver, D., K. Morris, M. Lynch, and W. Thomas. 2004. High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome. Nature 430 : 679 682.
6. Deutschbauer, A., D. Jaramillo, M. Proctor, J. Kumm, M. Hillenmeyer, R. Davis, C. Nislow, and G. Giaever. 2005. Mechanisms of haploinsufficiency revealed by genome-wide profiling in yeast. Genetics 169 : 1915 1925.
7. Dezso, Z., Z. Oltvai, and A. Barabási. 2003. Bioinformatics analysis of experimentally determined protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res. 13 : 2450 2454.
8. Elena, S. F., L. Ekunwe, N. Hajela, S. A. Oden, and R. E. Lenski. 1998. Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in Escherichia coli. Genetica 102-103 : 349 358.
9. Eyre-Walker, A., and P. Keightley. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 : 610 618.
10. Eyre-Walker, A., P. Keightley, N. Smith, and D. Gaffney. 2002. Quantifying the slightly deleterious mutation model of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 : 2142 2149.
11. García-Dorado, A., J. Monedero, and C. López-Fanjul. 1998. The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 102-103 : 255 265.
12. Gerdes, S., M. Scholle, J. Campbell, G. Balázsi, E. Ravasz, M. Daugherty, A. Somera, N. Kyrpides, I. Anderson, M. Gelfand, et al. 2003. Experimental determination and system level analysis of essential genes in Escherichia coli MG1655. J. Bacteriol. 185 : 5673 5684.
13. Giaever, G., A. Chu, L. Ni, C. Connelly, L. Riles, S. Véronneau, S. Dow, A. Lucau-Danila, K. Anderson, B. André, et al. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418 : 387 391.
14. Gu, Z., L. M. Steinmetz, X. Gu, C. Scharfe, R. W. Davis, and W. H. Li. 2003. Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature 421 : 63 66. (Pubitemid 36077084)
15. Haag-Liautard, C., M. Dorris, X. Maside, S. Macaskill, D. Halligan, B. Charlesworth, and P. Keightley. 2007. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445 : 82 85.
16. Hillenmeyer, M., E. Fung, J. Wildenhain, S. Pierce, S. Hoon, W. Lee, M. Proctor, R. St Onge, M. Tyers, D. Koller, et al. 2008. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320 : 362 365.
17. Hurst, L. D., and N. G. Smith. 1999. Do essential genes evolve slowly? Curr. Biol. 9 : 747 750.
18. Jasnos, L., and R. Korona. 2007. Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nat. Genet. 39 : 550 554.
19. Jasnos, L., P. Sliwa, and R. Korona. 2005. Resolution and repeatability of phenotypic assays by automated growth curve analysis in yeast and bacteria. Anal. Biochem. 344 : 138 140.
20. Kacser, H., and J. Burns. 1981. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97 : 639 666.
21. Kamath, R. S., A. G. Fraser, Y. Dong, G. Poulin, R. Durbin, M. Gotta, A. Kanapin, N. Le Bot, S. Moreno, M. Sohrmann, et al. 2003. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421 : 231 237.
22. Kellis, M., B. W. Birren, and E. S. Lander. 2004. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428 : 617 624.
23. Kobayashi, K., S. Ehrlich, A. Albertini, G. Amati, K. Andersen, M. Arnaud, K. Asai, S. Ashikaga, S. Aymerich, P. Bessieres, et al. 2003. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 4678 4683.
24. Loewe, L., and B. Charlesworth. 2006. Inferring the distribution of mutational effects on fitness in Drosophila. Biol. Lett. 2 : 426 430.
25. Mewes, H., S. Dietmann, D. Frishman, R. Gregory, G. Mannhaupt, K. Mayer, M. Münsterkötter, A. Ruepp, M. Spannagl, V. Stümpflen, et al. 2008. MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007. Nucleic Acids Res. 36 : D196 D201.
26. Mukai, T. 1964. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rate of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50 : 1 19.
27. Mukai, T., S. Chigusa, L. Mettler, and J. Crow. 1972. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72 : 335 355.
28. Oliver, S. 1996. From DNA sequence to biological function. Nature 379 : 597 600.
29. Parsons, A., A. Lopez, I. Givoni, D. Williams, C. Gray, J. Porter, G. Chua, R. Sopko, R. Brost, C. Ho, et al. 2006. Exploring the mode-of-action of bioactive compounds by chemical-genetic profiling in yeast. Cell 126 : 611 625.
30. Reguly, T., A. Breitkreutz, L. Boucher, B. Breitkreutz, G. Hon, C. Myers, A. Parsons, H. Friesen, R. Oughtred, A. Tong, et al. 2006. Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. 5 : 11.
31. Sanjuán, R., A. Moya, and S. Elena. 2004. The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 : 8396 8401.
32. Schoen, D. 2005. Deleterious mutation in related species of the plant genus Amsinckia with contrasting mating systems. Evolution 59 : 2370 2377.
33. Sliwa, P., and R. Korona. 2005. Loss of dispensable genes is not adaptive in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 17670 17674.
34. Steinmetz, L., C. Scharfe, A. Deutschbauer, D. Mokranjac, Z. Herman, T. Jones, A. Chu, G. Giaever, H. Prokisch, P. Oefner, et al. 2002. Systematic screen for human disease genes in yeast. Nat. Genet. 31 : 400 404.
35. Subramanian, S., and S. Kumar. 2006. Higher intensity of purifying selection on >90% of the human genes revealed by the intrinsic replacement mutation rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23 : 2283 2287.
36. Szafraniec, K., D. Wloch, P. Sliwa, R. Borts, and R. Korona. 2003. Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet. Res. 82 : 19 31.
37. Thatcher, J., J. Shaw, and W. Dickinson. 1998. Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 : 253 257.
38. Warner, J. 1999. The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24 : 437 440.
39. Warringer, J., and A. Blomberg. 2003. Automated screening in environmental arrays allows analysis of quantitative phenotypic profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 20 : 53 67.
40. Warringer, J., E. Ericson, L. Fernandez, O. Nerman, and A. Blomberg. 2003. High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 : 15724 15729.
41. Wloch, D., K. Szafraniec, R. Borts, and R. Korona. 2001. Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159 : 441 452.
42. Zhang, L., and W. Li. 2005. Human SNPs reveal no evidence of frequent positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 : 2504 2507.