Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis

Genetics

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 969-980

  Omholt, Stig W ^a   Plahte, Erik ^a   Øyehaug, Leiv ^a   Xiang, Kefang ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOREGULATION; EPISTASIS; GENE CONTROL; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HETEROSIS; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EPISTASIS, GENETIC; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, REGULATOR; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 0034046086     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. BOURGUET, D., 1999 The evolution of dominance. Heredity 83: 1-4.
2. BRAY, D., 1995 Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells. Nature 376: 307-312.
3. CHARLESWORTH, R., 1979 Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance. Nature 278: 848-849.
4. CHEVERUD, J. M., and E. J. ROUTMAN, 1995 Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139: 1455-1461.
5. CRNOKRAK, P., and D. A. ROFF, 1995 Dominance variance: associations with selection and fitness. Heredity 75: 530-540.
6. DAMERVAL, C., and D. DE VIENNE, 1993 Quantification of dominance for proteins pleiotropically affected by opaque-2 in maize. Heredity 70: 38-51.
7. DAMERVAL, C., A. MAURICE, J. M. JOSSE and D. DE VIENNE, 1994 Quantitative trait loci underlying gene product variation: a novel perspective for analyzing regulation of genome expression. Genetics 137: 289-301.
8. DAVENPORT, C. B., 1908 Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28: 454-455.
9. DE VIENNE, D., A. MAURICE, J. M. JOSSE, A. LEONARDI and C. DAMERVAL, 1994 Mapping factors controlling genetic expression. Cell. Mol. Biol. 40: 29-39.
10. DOEBLEY, J., A. STEC and C. GUSTUS, 1995 teosinte branched 1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
11. EAST, F. M., 1908 Inbreeding in corn. Report of the Connecticut Agricultural Experimental Station 1907-1908, pp. 419-428.
12. FALCONER, D. S., 1989 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Scientific & Technical, London.
13. FELSENSTEIN, J., 1965 The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics 52: 349-363.
14. FISHER, R. A., 1928a The possible modification of the response of the wild type to recurrent mutations. Am. Nat. 62: 115-126.
15. FISHER, R. A., 1928b Two further notes on the origin of dominance. Am. Nat. 62: 571-574.
16. FISHER, R. A., 1929 The evolution of dominance: reply to Professor Sewall Wright. Am. Nat. 63: 553-556.
17. FISHER, R. A., 1931 The evolution of dominance. Biol. Rev. 6: 345-368.
18. FISHER, R. A., 1934 Professor Wright on the theory of dominance. Am. Nat. 68: 370-374.
19. FRIEDRICH, G., and P. SOREANO, 1991 Promotor traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. Genes. Dev. 5: 1513-1523.
20. GEIGER, H. H., 1988 Epistasis and heterosis, pp. 395-399 in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, edited by B. S. WEIR, E. J. EISEN, M. M. GOODMAN and G. NAMKOONG. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
21. GLASS, L., 1975a Combinatorial and topological methods in nonlinear chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 63: 1325-1335.
22. GLASS, L., 1975b Classification of biological networks by their qualitative dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 54: 85-107.
23. GROSSNIKLAUS, U., M. S. MADHUSUDHAN and V. NANJUNDIAH, 1996 Nonlinear enzyme kinetics can lead to high metabolic flux control coefficients: implications for the evolution of dominance. J. Theor. Biol. 182: 299-302.
24. HENDERSON, C. R., 1989 Prediction of merits of potential matings from sire-maternal grandsire models with nonadditive genetic effects. J. Dairy Sci. 77: 2592-2605.
25. HILL, A. V., 1910 The possible effect of the aggregation of the molecules of hemoglobin. J. Physiol. 40: IV-VIII.
26. HOESCHELE, I., 1991 Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 74: 1743-1752.
27. HOLLICK, J. B., and V. L. CHANDLER, 1998 Epigenetic allelic states of a maize transcriptional regulatory locus exhibit overdominant gene action. Genetics 150: 891-897.
28. JAENISCH, R., 1988 Transgenic animals. Science 240: 1468-1474.
29. KACSER, H., and J. A. BURNS, 1973 The control of flux. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27: 65-104.
30. KACSER, H., and J. A. BURNS, 1981 The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97: 639-666.
31. KAHN, D., and H. V. WESTERHOFF, 1991 Control theory of regulatory cascades. J. Theor. Biol. 153: 255-285.
32. KEARSEY, M. J., and H. S. POONI, 1996 The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman and Hall, London.
33. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., 1996 A metabolic basis for dominance and recessivity. Genetics 143: 621-625.
34. KEMPTHORNE, O., 1977 Status of quantitative genetic theory, pp. 719-761 in Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, edited by E. POLLAK, O. KEMPTHORNE and T. B. BAILEY, JR. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
35. LANDE, R., 1988 Quantitative genetics and evolutionary theory, pp. 71-84 in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
36. LEFSTIN, J. A., and K. R. YAMAMOTO, 1998 Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators. Nature 392: 885-888.
37. LEONARDI, A., C. DAMERVAL and D. DE VIENNE, 1988 Organ-specific variability and inheritance of maize proteins revealed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Genet. Res. 52: 97-103.
38. LEWONTIN, R., 1974 Annotation: the analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. A. J. Hum. Genet. 26: 400-411.
39. LONG, A. D., S. L. MULLANEY, L. A. REID, J. D. FRY, C. H. LANGLEY et al., 1995 High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 1273-1291.
40. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
41. MAYO, O., and R. BURGER, 1997 The evolution of dominance: a theory whose time has passed? Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 72: 97-110.
42. MERILA, J., and B. C. SHELDON, 1999 Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness trails: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83: 103-109.
43. MESTL, T., E. PLAHTE and S. W. OMHOLT, 1995 A mathematical framework for describing and analysing gene regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 176: 291-300.
44. ORR, H. A., 1991 A test of Fisher's theory of dominance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11413-11415.
45. PAWSON, T., 1995 Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature 373: 573-580.
46. PHILLIPS, P. C., 1998 Anecdotal, historical and critical commentaries on genetics. Genetics 149: 1167-1171.
47. PLAHTE, E., T. MESTL and S. W. OMHOLT, 1998 A methodological basis for description and analysis of systems with switch-like interactions. J. Math. Biol. 36: 321-348.
48. PORTEOUS, J. W., 1996 Dominance - one hundred and fifteen years after Mendel's paper. J. Theor. Biol. 182: 223-232.
49. PRIOUL, J.-L., S. QUARRIE, M. CAUSSE and D. DE VIENNE, 1997 Dissecting complex physiological functions through the use of molecular quantitative genetics. J. Exp. Bot. 48: 1151-1164.
50. SAVAGEAU, M. A., 1969 Biochemical systems analysis II. The steady state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. J. Theor. Biol. 25: 370-379.
51. SAVAGEAU, M. A., 1971 Concepts relating the behavior of biochemical systems to their underlying molecular properties. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 145: 612-621.
52. SAVAGEAU, M. A., 1972 The behaviour of intact biochemical control systems. Curr. Topics Cell. Reg. 6: 63-130.
53. SAVAGEAU, M. A., 1992 Dominance according to metabolic control analysis: major achievement or house of cards? J. Theor. Biol. 154: 131-136.
54. SIHRAISHI, F., and M. A. SAVAGEAU, 1992 The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum IV. Resolution of discrepancies between alternative methods of analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 22934-22943.
55. SHULL, G. H., 1908 The composition of a field of maize. Am. Breed. Assoc. 4: 296-301.
56. SNOUSSI, E. H., and R. THOMAS, 1993 Logical identification of all steady states: the concept of feedback loop characteristic states. Bull. Math. Biol. 55: 973-991.
57. SORRIBAS, A., and M. A. SAVAGEAU, 1989 A comparison of variant theories of intact biochemical systems II: flux-oriented and metabolic control theories. Math. Biosci. 94: 195-238.
58. STUBER, C. V., S. LINCOLN, D. V. WOLFF, T. HELENTJARIS and E. S. LANDER, 1992 Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
59. TURELLI, M., 1988 Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42: 1342-1347.
60. TURELLI, M., and H. ORR, 1995 The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140: 389-402.
61. VAN DER GUGTEN, A. A., and H. V. WESTERHOFF, 1997 Internal regulation of a modular system, the different faces of internal control. BioSystems 44: 79-106.
62. WANG, R., A. STEC, J. HEY, L. LUKENS and J. DOUBLEY, 1999 The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236-239.
63. WILKIE, A. O. M., 1994 The molecular basis of genetic dominance. J. Med. Genet. 31: 89-98.
64. WRIGHT, S., 1929a Fisher's theory of dominance. Am. Nat. 63: 274-279.
65. WRIGHT, S., 1929b The evolution of dominance. Comment on Dr. Fisher's reply. Am. Nat. 63: 556-561.
66. WRIGHT, S., 1934 Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. Am. Nat. 63: 24-53.
67. XIAO, J., J. LI, L. YUAN and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1995 Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
68. YU, S. B., J. X. LI, C. G. XU, Y. F. TAN, Y. J. GAO et al., 1997 Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9226-9231.