The impact of Oregon reading first on student reading outcomes

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 307-331

  Baker, Scott K ^a   Smith, Jeanie Mercier ^a   Fien, Hank ^a   Kame'enui, Edward J ^a   Beck, Carrie Thomas ^a   Smolkowski, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81155138989     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/661995     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Baker, S. K., Smith, J. M., Fien, H., Otterstedt, J., Katz, R., Baker, D. L., & Thomas-Beck, C. (2007). Three year Oregon Reading First report. Retrieved from https://ctl.uoregon.edu/system/files/documents/ORRFImpact.Suppl_.pdf
2. Baker, S., Smolkowski, K., Katz, R., Fien, H., Seeley, J., Kame'enui, E., & Beck, C. (2008). Reading fluency as a predictor of reading proficiency in low-performing high poverty schools. School Psychology Review, 37, 18-37.
3. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading Next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
4. Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125-230.
5. Center on Education Policy. (2006). Keeping watch on Reading First. Washington, DC: Author.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
7. Coyne, M., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D., & Harn, B. (2004). Beginning reading intervention as inoculation or insulin. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 90-104.
8. Deal, T. E. (1990). Reframing reform. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 6-12.
9. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., & Moody, S. W. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65(3), 399-415.
10. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.
11. Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. M., Kame'enui, E. J., & Thomas Beck, C. (2008). Using nonsense word fluency to predict reading proficiency in K-2 for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 391- 408.
12. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., Jil, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151-175.
13. Francis, D. J. (2008, June 11). Reading First impact study: What have we learned and where do we go from here? Paper presented at the IES Research Conference, Washington, DC.
14. Gamse, B. C, Bloom, H. S., Kemple, J. J., & Jacob, R. T. (2008). Reading First impact study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
15. Gamse, B. C, Jacob, R. T., Horst, M., Boulay, B., & Unlu, F. (2008). Reading First impact study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
16. Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors that enhance sustained use of research-based instructional practices: A historical perspective on relevant research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 444-457.
17. Good, R., Baker, S., & Peyton, J. (2009). Making sense of nonsense word fluency: Determining adequate progress in early first grade reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 33-56.
18. Good, R. H., Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. (2001). Best practices in using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (vol. 4, pp. 679-700). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
19. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement.
20. Good, R. H., Wallin, J. U, Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Kaminski, R. (2002). System-wide percentile ranks for DIBELS benchmark assessment. Eugene: University of Oregon.
21. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Harcourt Educational Measurement. (2002). Stanford Achievement Test [SAT-10]. San Antonio, TX: Author.
23. Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 60-87.
24. Herlihy, C, Kemple, J. J., Bloom, H. S., Zhu, P., & Berlin, G. (2009). Understanding Reading First: What we know, what we don't, and what's next. MDRC Policy Brief, June, 1-8.
25. Hopkins, K. D. (1982). The unit of analysis: Group means versus individual observations. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 5-18.
26. Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C, & Coyne, M. D. (2000). Schools as host environments: Toward a school-wide reading improvement model. Annals of Dyslexia, 50, 31-52.
27. Kaminski, R., & Good, R. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25(2), 215-227.
28. Katz, L. A., Stone, C. A., Carlisle, J., Corey, D. L., & Zeng, J. (2008). Initial progress of children identified with disabilities in Michigan's Reading First schools. Exceptional Children, 74, 235-256.
29. Laird, P. D. (1988). Learningfrom good and bad data. Boston: Kluwer.
30. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
31. Mitchell, K., Brady, S., Cutting, L., Carlo, M., Gutierrez, K., Lesaux, N. K., Vellutino, F. (2008). Response to the Reading First impact study: Interim report. Washington, DC: Reading First Federal Advisory Committee.
32. Moss, M., Fountain, A. R., Boulay, B., Horst, M., Rodger, C, & Brown-Lyons, M. (2008). Reading First implementation evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service.
33. Moss, M., Jacob, R. T., Boulay, B., Horst, M., Poulos, J., St-Pierre, R., Dixon, Q. (2006).Reading First implementation evaluation: Interim report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
34. Muncey, D. E., & McQuillan, P. J. (1996). Reform and resistance in schools and classrooms. An ethnographic view of the coalition of essential schools (p. 317). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 20 USC § 6361 et seq. To close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child is left behind.
37. Nunnery, J. A. (1998). Reform ideology and the locus of development problem in educational restructuring: Enduring lessons from studies of educational innovation. Education and Urban Society, 30, 277-295.
38. Oregon Department of Education. (n.d.). Oregon assessment of knowledge and skills [OAKS]. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/
39. Oregon Department of Education. (2000). Oregon statewide reading and literature, mathematics, science, and social science multiple choice assessments. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/asmt/administration/manuals/2000
40. Oregon Department of Education. (2005). Closing the achievement gap: Oregon's plan for Success for All Students (p. 6). Salem, OR: Author.
41. Oregon Department of Education. (2008). OAKS-test administration manual: 2008-2009 school year. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/testing/manuals/2009/0809tam.pdf
42. Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Classroom effects on children's achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 365-397.
43. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38,109-119.
44. Raudenbush, S. W. (2009). The Brown legacy and the O'Connor challenge: Transforming schools in the images of children's potential. Educational Researcher, 38,169-180.
45. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
46. Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 546-567.
47. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
48. Schilling, S., Carlisle, J., Scott, S. E., & Zeng, J. (2007). Are fluency measures accurate predictors of reading achievement? Elementary School Journal, 107(5), 429-448.
49. Shaughnessy, M. F. (2008). Interview with Reid Lyon: Reading First is the largest concerted reading intervention program in the history of the civilized world. Education News. Retrieved from http://ednews.org/articles/25335/1/Interview-with-Reid-Lyon-Reading-First-is-the-largest-concerted-reading-intervention-program-in-the-history-of-the-civilized-world/Page1.html
50. Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77-87.
51. Simmons, D., Kame'enui, E., Good, R. H., Harn, B., Cole, C, & Braun, D. (2002). Building, implementing, and sustaining a beginning reading improvement model: Lessons learned school by school. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 537-570). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
52. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
54. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Rural community empowerment program. Retrieved from http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/BCP-EZEC-Home.html
55. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Guidance for the Reading First program. Washington, DC: Author.
56. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, & Policy and Program Studies Service. (2006). Reading First implementation evaluation: Interim report. Washington, DC: Author.