Linear-time resource allocation in security games with identical fully protective resources

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-11-06, Issue , 2011, Pages 42-48

  Lerma, Octavio ^a   Kreinovich, Vladik ^a,b   Kiekintveld, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b University of Texas at El Paso   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION; OPTIMAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SECURITY DOMAINS; STACKELBERG; WORST-CASE COMPLEXITY;

ALGORITHMS; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES; DECISION THEORY; GAME THEORY;

RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 80054941519     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Agmon, N.; Kraus, S.; Kaminka, G. A.; and Sadov, V. 2009. Adversarial uncertainty in multi-robot patrol. In IJCAI-09.
2. Alpcan, T., and Basar, T. 2003. A game theoretic approach to decision and analysis in network intrusion detection. In Proc. of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2595-2600.
3. Bagwell, K. 1995. Commitment and observability in games. Games and Economic Behavior 8:271-280.
4. Basar, T., and Olsder, G. J. 1995. Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2nd edition.
5. Bier, V. M. 2007. Choosing what to protect. Risk Analysis 27(3):607-620. (Pubitemid 47063172)
6. Conitzer, V., and Sandholm, T. 2006. Computing the optimal strategy to commit to. In ACM EC-06, 82-90.
7. Cormen, T. H.; Leiserson, C. E.; Rivest, R. L.; and Stein, C. 2009. Introduction to Algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3rd edition edition.
8. Gatti, N. 2008. Game theoretical insights in strategic patrolling: Model and algorithm in normal-form. In ECAI-08, 403-407.
9. Halvorson, E.; Conitzer, V.; and Parr, R. 2009. Multi-step multi-sensor hider-seeker games. In IJCAI.
10. Jain, M.; Kardes, E.; Kiekintveld, C.; Tambe, M.; and Ordonez, F. 2010. Security games with arbitrary schedules: A branch and price approach. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
11. Kiekintveld, C.; Jain, M.; Tsai, J.; Pita, J.; Ordonez, F.; and Tambe, M. 2009. Computing optimal randomized resource allocations for massive security games. In AAMAS-09.
12. Leitmann, G. 1978. On generalized Stackelberg strategies. Optimization Theory and Applications 26(4):637-643.
13. Nguyen, K. C., and Basar, T. A. T. 2009. Security games with incomplete information. In Proc. of IEEE Intl. Conf. on Communications (ICC 2009).
14. Paruchuri, P.; Pearce, J. P.; Marecki, J.; Tambe, M.; Ordonez, F.; and Kraus, S. 2008. Playing games with security: An efficient exact algorithm for Bayesian Stackelberg games. In AAMAS-08, 895-902.
15. Pita, J.; Jain, M.; Western, C.; Portway, C.; Tambe, M.; Ordonez, F.; Kraus, S.; and Parachuri, P. 2008. Depoloyed ARMOR protection: The application of a game-theoretic model for security at the Los Angeles International Airport. In AAMAS-08 (Industry Track).
16. Pita, J.; Tambe, M.; Kiekintveld, C.; Cullen, S.; and Steigerwald, E. 2011. Guards - game theoretic security allocation on a national scale. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
17. Roughgarden, T. 2004. Stackelberg scheduling strategies. SIAM Journal on Computing 33(2):332-350.
18. Sandholm, T.; Gilpin, A.; and Conitzer, V. 2005. Mixed-integer programming methods for finding Nash equilibria. In AAAI-05, 495-501.
19. Sandler, T., and M., D. G. A. 2003. Terrorism and game theory. Simulation and Gaming 34(3):319-337.
20. Srivastava, V.; Neel, J.; MacKenzie, A. B.; Menon, R.; Dasilva, L. A.; Hicks, J. E.; Reed, J. H.; and Gilles, R. P. 2005. Using game theory to analyze wireless ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutuorials 7(4).
21. Tsai, J.; Rathi, S.; Kiekintveld, C.; Ordóñez, F.; and Tambe, M. 2009. IRIS - A tools for strategic security allocation in transportation networks. In AAMAS (Industry Track).
22. von Stackelberg, H. 1934. Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Vienna: Springer.
23. von Stengel, B., and Zamir, S. 2004. Leadership with commitment to mixed strategies. Technical Report LSE-CDAM-2004-01, CDAM Research Report.