Scenario-based touching: On the influence of top-down processes on tactile and visual appreciation

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 143-152

  Jakesch, Martina ^a   Zachhuber, Martina ^a   Leder, Helmut ^a   Spingler, Mark ^b   Carbon, Claus Christian ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b FORD WERKE GMBH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Design evaluation; Haptics; Multisensory perception; Sensotact reference frame; Tactile perception; Visual appreciation

Indexed keywords

DESIGN EVALUATION; HAPTICS; MULTISENSORY; REFERENCE FRAME; TACTILE PERCEPTION; VISUAL APPRECIATIONS;

ECOLOGY; EXPERIMENTS; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; SURFACE TESTING;

DESIGN;

EID: 80054922088     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: 14356066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-010-0102-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adelson EH (1993) Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness. Science 262(5142):2042-2044 (Pubitemid 24041885)
2. Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from nearoptimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14(3):257-262 (Pubitemid 38215356)
3. Battarbee K, Koskinen I (2008) Co-experience: product experience as social interaction. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 461-475
4. Belke B, Leder H, Augustin MD (2006) Mastering style-effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychol Sci 48(2): 115-134
5. Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EE, Figarola JH, Hiltz D (1995) Threshold detection and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Ther Off J Am Soc Hand Ther 8(2):155-162
6. Brewer MB, Hewstone M (2004) Social cognition. Blackwell, Oxford
7. Carbon C-C (2010) The cycle of preference: long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychol 134(2):233-244
8. Carbon C-C, Leder H (2005) The repeated evaluation technique(RET). A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Appl Cogn Psychol 19(5):587-601 (Pubitemid 41051433)
9. Carbon C-C, Michael L, Leder H (2008) Design evaluation by combination of repeated evaluation technique and measurement of electrodermal activity. Res Eng Design 19(2-3):143-149
10. Coughlan P, Mashman R (1999) Once is not enough: repeated exposure to and aesthetic evaluation of an automobile design prototype. Des Stud 20(6):553-563 (Pubitemid 129587978)
11. Creusen MEH, Schoormans JPL (2005) The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. J Prod Innov Manage 22(1): 63-81
12. Crilly N, Moultrie J, Clarkson PJ (2004) Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des Stud 25(6):547-577
13. Desmet PMA, Hekkert P (2007) Framework of product experience. Int J Design 1(1):57-66
14. Du Z, Yu W (2007) A comprehensive handle evaluation system for fabrics: I. Measurement and characterization of mass and bending properties. Meas Sci Technol 18:3547-3553
15. Ernst MO, Banks MS, Bulthoff HH (2000) Touch can change visual slant perception. Nat Neurosci 3(1):69-73 (Pubitemid 30126350)
16. Faerber SJ, Leder H, Gerger G, Carbon C-C (2010) Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychol 135(2):191-200
17. Gepshtein S, Banks MS (2003) Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Curr Biol 13(6):483-488 (Pubitemid 36345722)
18. Hekkert P, Schifferstein HNJ (2008) Introducing product experience. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3-8
19. Hekkert P, Snelders D, van Wieringen PCW (2003) 'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. Br J Psychol 94:111-124 (Pubitemid 37189160)
20. Heufler G (2004) Design basics. From ideas to products. Niggli Verlag AG, Sulgen/Zürich
21. Holt R, Barnes C (2010) Towards an integrated approach to ''Design for X'': an agenda for decision-based DFX research. Res Eng Design 21(2):123-136
22. Jansson-Boyd C, Marlow N (2007) Not only in the eye of the beholder: tactile information can affect aesthetic evaluation. Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts 1(3):170-173
23. Kahrimanovic M, Tiest WMB, Kappers AML (2009) Context effects in haptic perception of roughness. Exp Brain Res 194(2): 287-297
24. Krishna A, Morrin M (2008) Does touch affect taste? The perceptual transfer of product container haptic cues. J Consum Res 34(6): 807-818
25. Kunst-Wilson WR, Zajonc RB (1980) Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207:557-558 (Pubitemid 10141143)
26. Leder H, Carbon CC, Ripsas A (2006) Entitling art: influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychol 121(2):176-198 (Pubitemid 43071658)
27. Loewy R (1953) Never leave well enough alone. Simon and Schuster, New York
28. Ludden GDS, Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (2007) Effects of visual- auditory incongruity on product expression and surprise. Int J Design 1(3):29-39
29. Ludden GDS, Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (2009) Visual-tactual incongruities in products as sources of surprise. Emp Stud Arts 27(1):61-87
30. Mooy SC, Robben HSJ (2002) Managing consumers' product evaluations through direct product experience. J Prod Brand Manage 11(6/7):432-446
31. Oldfield RC (1971) Assessment and analysis of handedness- Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97-113
32. Oruç I, Maloney LT, Landy MS (2003) Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vis Res 43(23): 2451-2468 (Pubitemid 38366046)
33. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design. A systematic approach. Springer, London
34. Ritterfeld U (2002) Social heuristics in interior design preferences. J Environ Psychol 22:369-386 (Pubitemid 35449915)
35. Russell PA (2003) Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. Br J Psychol 94:99-110 (Pubitemid 37189159)
36. Schifferstein HNJ (2006) The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Psychol 121(1):41-64
37. Schifferstein HNJ, Spence C (2008) Multisensory product experience. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (eds) product experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 133-161
38. Schönhammer R (2001) Haptische Wahrnehmung und Design [Haptic perception and Design]. In: Grunwald M, Beyer L (eds) Der bewegte Sinn. Grundlagen und Anwendungen zur haptischen Wahrnehmung. [The active sense. Basics and applications of haptic perception.]. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 151-160
39. Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. J Hand Ther Off J Am Soc Hand Ther 6(1):11-22
40. Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J Pers Soc Psychol 9(2):1-27
41. Zajonc RB, VanKreveld D, Tavris C, Shaver P (1972) Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability. J Pers Soc Psychol 21(3):270-280