Towards an integrated approach to "design for X": An agenda for decision-based DFX research

Research in Engineering Design

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 123-136

  Holt, Raymond ^a   Barnes, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; Decision analysis; Design for X

Indexed keywords

DECISION ANALYSIS; DESIGN DECISION-MAKING; DESIGN DECISIONS; DESIGN FOR X; HOLISTIC APPROACH; INTEGRATED APPROACH; TOPDOWN;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; DECISION THEORY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 77952241099     PISSN: 09349839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-009-0081-6     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. HS Abdalla 1998 A concurrent engineering constraint-based system Comput Ind Eng 35 459 462 10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00133-8
2. Ako Y (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA
3. F Ardente G Beccali M Cellura 2003 Eco-sustainable energy and environmental strategies in design for recycling: the software "ENDLESS" Ecol Modell 163 101 118 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00418-0 (Pubitemid 36499839)
4. Arrow KJ (1973) Social choice and individual values, 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven
5. CJ Barnes GEM Jared KG Swift 2004 Decision support for sequence generation in an assembly-oriented design environment Robot Comput Integr Manuf 20 289 300 10.1016/j.rcim.2003.10.013
6. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight W (2002) Product design for manufacture and assembly, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
7. Bralla J (1999) The design for manufacturability handbook, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
8. Brissaud D, Tichkiewitch S (2000) Innovation and manufacturability analysis in an integrated design context. Comput Ind 43:111-121
9. Bucciarelli LL (1994) Designing engineers. MIT, Cambridge
10. Chau HH (2002) Preserving brand identity in engineering design using a grammatical approach. PhD thesis, University of Leeds
11. P Checkland A Casar 1986 Vicker's concept of an appreciative system: a systemic account J Appl Syst Anal 13 3 17
12. PJ Clarkson S Keates 2003 Countering design exclusion: bridging the gap between usability and accessibility Univ Access Inf Soc 2 215 225 10.1007/s10209-003-0059-5
13. Coleman R, Lebbon C, Keates S (2003) From margins to mainstream. In: Clarkson J, Coleman R, Keates S, Lebbon C et al (eds) Inclusive design: design for the whole population. Springer, London, pp 1-23
14. A Desai A Mital 2003 Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production Int J Ind Ergonom 32 265 281 10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00067-2 (Pubitemid 36962901)
15. Dong H, Clarkson PJ (2005) Framework for an inclusive design toolkit. In: Proceedings of INCLUDE 2005, international conference on inclusive design, Royal College of Art, London, UK, 5-8th April 2005
16. W Edwards 1977 How to use multi-attribute utility measurement for social decision-making IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 7 326 340 10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720
17. Edwards W (1992) Toward the demise of economic man and woman; bottom lines from Santa Cruz. In: Edwards W (ed) Utility theories: measurements and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 253-267
18. KL Edwards 2002 Towards more strategic product design for manufacture and assembly: priorities for concurrent engineering Mater Des 23 651 656
19. Edwards W, Von Winterfeldt D (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society, Gabriola Island
21. MG Fernández CC Seepersad DW Rosen, et al. 2005 Decision support in concurrent engineering-the utility-based selection decision support problem Concurr Eng Res Appl 13 13 27 10.1177/1063293X05050912 (Pubitemid 40319527)
22. CH Fine B Golany H Naseraldin 2005 Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach J Oper Manag 23 389 403 10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.005 (Pubitemid 40357126)
23. M Franssen 2005 Arrow's theorem, multi-criteria decision problems and multi-attribute preferences in engineering design Res Eng Design 16 42 56 10.1007/s00163-004-0057-5 (Pubitemid 41604352)
24. LM Galantucci R Spina 2003 Evaluation of filling conditions of injection moulding by integrating numerical simulations and experimental tests J Mater Process Technol 141 266 275 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00276-0
25. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, the ABC Research group (1999) Simple Heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford
26. Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa HF (1999) Smart choices: a practical guide to making better decisions. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
27. GA Hazelrigg 1996 Implications of arrow's impossibility theorem on approaches to optimal engineering design J Mech Des 118 161 164 10.1115/1.2826864
28. GA Hazelrigg 1998 A framework for decision-based engineering design J Mech Des 120 653 658 10.1115/1.2829328
29. B Henson C Barnes R Livesey, et al. 2006 Affective consumer requirements: a case study of moisturizer packaging Concurr Eng Res Appl 14 187 196 10.1177/1063293X06068358 (Pubitemid 44288619)
30. I Horváth 2004 A treatise on order in engineering design research Res Eng Des 15 155 181 10.1007/s00163-004-0052-x (Pubitemid 40003059)
31. Huang GQ (1996) Introduction. In: Huang GQ (ed) Design for X: concurrent engineering imperatives. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 1-17
32. J Huisman CB Boks ALN Stevels 2003 Quotes for environmentally weighted recyclability (QWERTY): concept of describing product recyclability in terms of environmental value Int J Prod Res 41 3649 3665 10.1080/0020754031000120069
33. Ireson WG, Coombes CF Jr (1988) Handbook of reliability engineering and management. McGraw-Hill, New York
34. Jordan PW (2000) Designing pleasurable products: an introduction to the new human factors. Taylor & Francis, London
35. Keeney RL (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision-making. Harvard University Press, London
36. Keeney RL, Raiffa HF (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and trade-offs. Wiley, New York
37. W Knight M Curtis 2002 Measuring your ecodesign Manuf Eng 81 64 69 10.1049/me:20020204
38. D Koonce R Judd D Sormaz, et al. 2003 A hierarchical cost estimation tool Comput Ind 50 293 302 10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00016-2
39. P Kroes 2002 Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts Des Stud 23 287 302
40. E Kroll TA Hanft 1998 Quantitative evaluation of product disassembly for recycling Res Eng Design 10 1 14 10.1007/BF01580266
41. Kumar UD, Crocker J (2003) Maintainability and maintenance-a case study on mission critical aircraft and engine components. In: Blischke WR, Murthy DNP (eds) Case studies in reliability and maintenance. Wiley Interscience
42. T-C Kuo SH Huang HC Zhang 2001 Design for manufacture and design for 'X': concepts, applications and perspectives Comput Ind Eng 41 241 260 10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00045-6 (Pubitemid 33024451)
43. J La Trobe-Bateman D Wild 2003 Design for manufacturing: use of a spreadsheet model of manufacturability to optimize product design and development Res Eng Des 14 107 117
44. D Li A McKay A de Pennington, et al. 2001 A Web-based tool and a heuristic method for co-operation of manufacturing supply chain decisions J Intell Manuf 12 433 453 10.1023/A:1012296203032 (Pubitemid 33074838)
45. Ljungberg LY (2007) Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater Des 28:466-479
46. Lucas Engineering Systems Ltd (1993), Design for manufacture and assembly practitioners manual, Version 10. University of Hull
47. C Luttrop J Lagerstadt 2006 EcoDesign and the ten golden rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development J Cleaner Prod 14 1396 1408 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022 (Pubitemid 43975780)
48. Masanet E, Auer R, Tsuda D et al. (2002) An assessment and prioritization of "design for recycling" guidelines for plastic components. IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment 6-9 May 2002, pp. 5-10
49. Y Matsubara M Nagamachi 1997 Hybrid Kansei engineering system and design support Int J Ind Ergonom 19 81 92 10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00005-4 (Pubitemid 26395707)
50. A McKay A de Pennington J Baxter 2000 Requirements management: a representation scheme for product specifications Comput Aid Des 33 511 520 10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00050-1
51. S Minehane R Duane P O'Sullivan, et al. 2000 Design for reliability Microelectron Reliab 40 1285 1294 10.1016/S0026-2714(00)00138-4
52. Miyakawa S, Ohashi T (1986) The Hitachi assemblability evaluation method (AEM). In: Proceedings of the first international conference on product design for assembly, Newport, RI, April 1986
53. M Nagamachi 2002 Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development Appl Ergonom 33 289 294 10.1016/S0003- 6870(02)00019-4 (Pubitemid 34626548)
54. EK O'Shea 2004 Design for environment in conceptual product design-a decision model to reflect environmental issues of all life-cycle phases J Sustain Prod Des 2 11 28 10.1023/B:JSPD.0000016460.43594.34
55. AT Olewnik K Lewis 2005 On validating design decision support tools Concurr Eng Res Appl 13 111 122 10.1177/1063293X05053796 (Pubitemid 40794915)
56. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London
57. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
58. L Phillips 1984 A theory of requisite decision models Acta Psychol 56 29 48 10.1016/0001-6918(84)90005-2
59. JM Porter K Case R Marshall, et al. 2004 'Beyond Jack and Jill': designing for individuals using HADRIAN Int J Ind Ergonom 33 249 264 10.1016/j.ergon.2003.08.002 (Pubitemid 38199979)
60. Pugh S (1990) Total design: integrated methods for successful product engineering. Addison Wesley, Wokingham
61. Rose CM, Stevels A, Ishii K (2000) A new approach to end-of-life design advisor (ELDA). In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, San Francisco, CA, 8-10 May, pp 99-104
62. Roy R (2003) Cost engineering:why, what and how? Decision engineering report series, Cranfield University
63. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
64. MJ Scott EK Antonsson 1999 Arrow's theorem and engineering design decision making Res Eng Des 11 218 228 10.1007/s001630050016
65. SK Sim AHB Duffy 2003 Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities Res Eng Des 14 200 233 10.1007/s00163-003-0037-1
66. Simon HA (1957) Models of man, social and rational: mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. Wiley, New York
67. Slavila C-A, Decreuse C, Ferney M et al (2004) Maintainability evaluation during the design phase. In: Bramley AN, Culley SJ, Dekoninck EA, McMahon CA, Medland AJ, Mileham AR, Newnes LB, Owen GW (eds) Proceedings of the IDMME 2004 conference, Bath, UK, 5-7 Apr 2004
68. Swift KG, Booker JD (2003) Process selection: from design to manufacture, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
69. Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes. The Organization, Tokyo
70. DL Thurston 2001 Real and misconceived limitations to decision based design with utility analysis J Mech Des 123 176 182 10.1115/1.1363610
71. Van Hemel CG, Keldmann T (1996) Applying "Design for X" experience in design for environment. In: Huang GQ (ed) Design for X: concurrent engineering imperatives. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 72-95
72. Veroutis AD, Fava JA (1996) Framework for the development of metrics for design for environment (DfE) assessment of products. In: IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, pp 13-24
73. Vickers G (1965) The art of judgment. Chapman & Hall, London
74. TL Vincent 1983 Game theory as a design tool J Mech Transmission Auto Des 105 165 170 10.1115/1.3258503
75. Watson B, Radcliffe D, Dale P (1996) A meta-methodology for the application of DFX guidelines. In: Huang GQ (ed) Design for X: concurrent engineering imperatives. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 441-462
76. DG Woodward 1997 Life cycle costing-theory, information acquisition and application Int J Project Manag 15 335 344 10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00089-0
77. M Zairi 1992 The art of benchmarking: using customer feedback to establish a performance gap Total Qual Manag 3 177 188 10.1080/09544129200000019