Social heuristics in interior design preferences

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 369-386

  Ritterfeld, Ute ^a,b  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036899409     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.2002.0276     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aks, D. J. & Sprott, J. C. (1996). Quantifying aesthetic preferences for chaotic patterns. Empirical Studies of the Art, 14, 1-16.
2. Allesch, C. G. (1987). Geschichte der psychologischen Asthetik. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
3. Ammermann, C. (1971). Experimente zur Instrumentenent-wicklung und Validierung: Strukturiertheit und Komplexität des Stimulusmaterials. Intrinsische Motivation (IM) und kognitive Leistung. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. J. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds), Handbook of Social Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1-40.
5. Bargh, J. A. & Barndollar, K. (1996). Automaticity in action. The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds), The Psychology of Action. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 457-481.
6. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P. & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104-128.
7. Bell, S. S., Holbrook, M. B. & Solomon, M. E. (1991). Combining esthetic and social value to explain preferences for product styles with the incorporation of personality and ensemble effects. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 243-274.
8. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Berlyne, D. E. (1974a). The new experimental aesthetics. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed), Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1-26.
10. Berlyne, D. E. (Ed). (1974b). Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11. Boesch, E. E. (1980). Kultur und Handlung. Eine Einführung in die Kulturpsychologie. Bern: Huber.
12. Bourdieu, R. (1987). Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
13. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds), Advances in Social Cognition, Vol. I. New York: Guilford, pp. 1-36.
14. Brömer, P. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber unvertrauten Produkten: Selbstwirksamkeit bestimmt die Intensität der Verarbeitung relevanter Produktattribute. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 124-133.
15. Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice: Its Social Psychology. Oxford, Engl.: Blackwell.
16. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
17. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L. & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3-25.
18. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. & Eagley, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds), Unintended Thought: Limits of Awareness, Intention, and Control. New York: Guilford, pp. 212-252.
19. Chaiken, S. & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambuguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
20. Cupchik, G. C. (1986). A decade after Berlyne. New directions in experimental aesthetics. Poetics, 15, 345-369.
21. Cupchik, G. C. & Berlyne, D. E. (1979). The perception of collative properties in visual stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 93-104.
22. Cupchik, G. C. & László, J. (1992). Emerging Visions of the Aesthetics Process. Psychology, Semiology, and Philosophy. Cambridge: University Press.
23. Diewald, M. (1990). Von Klassen und Schichten zu Lebensstilen - Ein neues Paradigma für die empirische Sozialforschung? Berlin: Wissenchaftszentrum.
24. Dittmar, H. & Hempstead, H. (1992). The Social Psychology of Material Possessions. To Have Is to Be. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 247-282.
26. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M. C. & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
27. Fechner, G. t. (1871). Vorschule der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
28. Fiedler, K., Armbruster, T., Nickel, S., Walther, E. & Asbeck, J. (1996). Constructive biases in social judgment: experiments on the self-verfication of question contents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 861-873.
29. Fischer, G.-N. (1990). Psychologie des Arbeitsraumes. Frankfurt: Campus.
30. Fiske, S. T. & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-74.
31. Groat, L. (1981). Meaning in architecture: new directions and sources. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 73-85.
32. Henckmann, W. & Lotter, K. (1992). Lexikon der Ästhetik. München: Beck.
33. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S. & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
34. Hodges, S. D. (1997). When matching up features messes up decisions: the role of feature matching in successive choices. Journal for Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1310-1321.
35. Hradil, S. (1990). Milieus, Subkulturen, Lebensstile - Alte Begriffe und neue Strukturen. In L. Vaskovics (Ed.), Subkulturen und Subkulturkonzepte. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
36. Kahnemann, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
37. Kant, I. (1986). Geschmack: Einsamkeit und Geselligkeit. In T. H. Macho, M. Moser & C. Subik (Eds). Asthetik Stuttgart: Reclam, pp. 109-110.
38. Kraft Alsop, C. (1996). Dinge, Orte, Paare. Zur Bedeutung von Objekten, Orten und Zeremonien im Leben von Paaren. Münster; Waxmann.
39. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case of motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
40. Lepore, L. & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 275-287.
41. Lüdtke, H. (1989). Expressive Ungleichheit. Zur Soziologie der Lebensstille. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
42. Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotype as energy-saving devices; a peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37-47.
43. Markus, H. & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindsey & E. Aronson (Eds), Handbook of Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 137-230.
44. Müller, H.-P. (1989). Lebensstile. Ein neues Paradigma der Differenzierungs und Ungleichheitsforchung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 41, 53-71.
45. Müller, H.-P. (1992). Sozialstruktur und Lebensstile. Der neuere theoretische Diskurs über soziale Ungleichheit Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
46. Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics. The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior, 26, 377-401.
47. Niketta, R. (1987). Sozialpsychologie der Ästhetik. Unpublished Habilitation Thesis, University of Frankfurt, Germany.
48. Osgood, C. E., Succi, G. J. & Tannenbaum, D. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: Univerity of Illinois Press.
49. Raab, E. (1981). Ästhetik und Neugier. In H.-G. Voss & H. Keller (Eds), Neugierforschung. Weinheim: Beltz, pp. 263-308.
50. Richter, R. (1989). Subtile Distinkton. Zur Reproduktion sozialer Ungleichheit im mikrosozialen Bereich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 3, 53-63.
51. Ritterfeld, U. (1996). Psychologie der Wohnästhetik: Wie es uns gefällt? Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
52. Roskos-Ewoldson, D. R. & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198-211.
53. Sadalla, E. K. & Sheets, V. L. (1993). Symbolism in building materials. Self-presentational and cognitive components. Environment and Behavior, 25, 155-180.
54. Sanitioso, R., Freud, K. & Lee, J. (1996). The influence of self-related goals on the use of stereotypical and individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 751-761.
55. Schneider, G. (1990). Image: Bedeutungsbezogene Umweltrepräsentationen. In L. Kruse, c. F. Graumann & E. D. Lantermann (Eds), Ökologische Psychologie. Ein Handbuch in Schlüsselbegriffen. München: Psychologie Verlags Union, pp. 278-287.
56. Schulze, G. (1992). Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt: Campus.
57. Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W, (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
58. Silbermann, A. (1991). Neues vom Wohnen der Deutschen (West). Köln: Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik.
59. Smith, E. R., Fazio, R. H. & Ceijka, M. A. (1996). Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 888-898.
60. Strack, F. (1985). Urteilsheuristiken. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Eds), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Motivations- und Informationsverarbeitungstheorien. Bern: Huber, pp. 239-267.
61. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
62. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. C. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Moneterey, CA: Brooks & Cole, pp. 7-24.
63. Temme, J. E. V. (1993). Fechner's primary school revisited: Towards a social psychology of taste. Poetics, 21, 463-479.
64. Vester, M. (1995). Milieuwandel und regionaler Strukturwandel in Ostdeutschland. In M. Vester, M. Hofmann & I. Zierke (Eds), Soziale Milieus in Ostdeutschland: Gesellschaftliche Strukturen zwischen Zerfall und Neubildung Köln: Bund-Verlag, pp. 7-50.
65. Voss, H.-G. (1981). Kognition und exploratives Handeln. In H.-G. Voss & H. Keller (Eds), Neugierforschung. Weinheim: Beltz, pp. 175-196.
66. Wilson, M. A. & Mackenzie, N. E. (2000). Social attributions based on domestic interiors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 343-354.
67. Wohlwill, J.-F. (1980). The place of order and uncertainty in art and environmental aesthetics. Motivation and Emotion, 2, 133-142.
68. Zapf, W, Breuer, S., Hampel, J., Krause, P., Mohr, H.-M. & Wiegand, E. (1987). Individualisierung und Sicherheit. Untersuchungen zur Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. München: