Context effects in haptic perception of roughness

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 194, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 287-297

  Kahrimanovic, Mirela ^a   Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M ^a   Kappers, Astrid M L ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

After effect; Assimilation; Spatial induction; Tactile; Temporal adaptation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DECISION MAKING; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TOUCH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65249108115     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1697-x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adelson EH (1993) Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness. Science 262:2042-2044
2. Biermann K, Schmitz F, Witte OW, Konczak J, Freund HJ, Schnitzler A (1998) Interaction of finger representation in the human first somatosensory cortex: a neuromagnetic study. Neurosci Lett 251:13-16
3. Blake DT, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO (1997) Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. J Neurosci 17:7480-7489
4. Blakemore C, Muncey JPJ, Ridley RM (1973) Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. Vision Res 13:1915-1931
5. Cao D, Shevell SK (2005) Chromatic assimilation: spread light or neural mechanism? Vision Res 45:1031-1045
6. Carandini M, Barlow HB, O'Keefe LP, Poirson AB, Anthony Movshon J (1997) Adaptation to contingencies in macaque primary visual cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 352:1149-1154
7. Chapman CE, Tremblay F, Jiang W, Belingard L, Meftah EM (2002) Central neural mechanisms contributing to the perception of tactile roughness. Behav Brain Res 135:225-233
8. Connor CE, Hsiao SS, Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1990) Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J Neurosci 10:3823-3836
9. Connor CE, Johnson KO (1992) Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J Neurosci 12:3414-3426
10. Coren S (1993) The left-hander syndrome. Vintage Books, New York De Weert CMM, Van Kruysbergen NAWH (1997) Assimilation: central and peripheral effects. Perception 26:1217-1224
11. Dicarlo JJ, Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1998) Structure of receptive fields in area 3b of primary somatosensory cortex in the alert monkey. J Neurosci 18:2626-2645
12. Dorsch AK, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO, Yoshioka T (2001) Tactile attention: subjective magnitude estimates of roughness using one or two fingers. In: Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, vol 27
13. Dragoi V, Sharma J, Sur M (2000) Adaptation-induced plasticity of orientation tuning in adult visual cortex. Neuron 28:287-298
14. Fitzgerald PJ, Lane JW, Thakur PH, Hsiao SS (2006) Receptive field (RF) properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: RF size, shape, and somatotopic organization. J Neurosci 26:6485-6495
15. Forss N, Jousmaki V, Hari R (1995) Interaction between afferent input from fingers in human somatosensory cortex. Brain Res 685:68-76
16. Gandevia SC, Burke D, McKeon BB (1983) Convergence in the somatosensory pathway between cutaneous afferents from the index and middle fingers in man. Exp Brain Res 50:415-425
17. Hollins M, Bensmäa SJ, Washburn S (2001) Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. Somatosens Mot Res 18:253-262
18. Hollins M, Lorenz F, Harper D (2006) Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. J Neurosci 26:5582-5588
19. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160:106-154
20. Iwamura Y, Tanaka M, Sakamoto M, Hikosaka O (1983) Converging patterns of finger representation and complex response properties of neurons in area 1 of the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Exp Brain Res 51:327-337
21. Jones JP, Palmer LA (1987) The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:1187-1211
22. Lederman SJ (1981) The perception of surface roughness by active and passive touch. Bull Psychon Soc 18:253-255
23. Lederman SJ (1983) Tactual roughness perception: spatial and temporal determinants. Can J Psychol 37:498-511
24. Lederman SJ, Taylor MM (1972) Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percept Psychophys 12:401-408
25. Lederman SJ, Loomis JM, Williams BA (1982) The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness. Percept Psychophys 32:109-116
26. Shevell SK, Wei J (2000) A central mechanism of chromatic contrast. Vision Res 40:3173-3180
27. Sinclair RJ, Burton H (1993) Neuronal activity in the second somatosensory cortex of monkeys (Macaca mulatta) during active touch of gratings. J Neurophysiol 70:331-350
28. Smith VC, Jin PQ, Pokorny J (2001) The role of spatial frequency in color induction. Vision Res 41:1007-1021
29. Van der Horst BJ, Duijndam MJA, Ketels MFM, Wilbers MTJM, Zwijsen SA, Kappers AML (2008) Intramanual and intermanual transfer of the curvature after effect. Exp Brain Res 187:491-496
30. Vogels IMLC, Kappers AML, Koenderink JJ (2001) Haptic aftereffect of successively touched curved surfaces. Acta Psychol 106:247-263
31. Ware C, Cowan WB (1982) Changes in perceived color due to chromatic interactions. Vision Res 22:1353-1362
32. Webster MA, Malkoc G, Bilson AC, Webster SM (2002) Color contrast and contextual influences on color appearance. J Vision 2:505-519