Effects of self-conscious emotions on affective and behavioral responses in HCI and CMC

SIGDOC'11 - Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 151-156

  Hou, Jinghui ^a   Lee, Kwan Min ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

fair offer; hci and cmc; humanness; self conscious emotions

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COMPUTER AGENTS; FAIR OFFER; GOLD STANDARDS; HUMANNESS; SELF-CONSCIOUS EMOTIONS; USER EXPERIENCE;

DESIGN;

EID: 80054779099     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2038476.2038505     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bailenson, J.N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C. and Loomis, J.M. Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10 (6). 583-598.
2. Barrett, K.C. A functionalist approach to shame and guilt.
3. Bartneck, C., Chioke, R., Menges, R. and Deckers, I. Robot Abuse-A Limitation of the Media Equation.
4. Bartneck, C. and Hue, J. Exploring the abuse of robots. Interaction Studies, 9 (3). 415-433.
5. Chaminade, T., Hodgins, J. and Kawato, M. Anthropomorphism influences perception of computeranimated characters' actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2 (3). 206.
6. Dotsch, R. and Wigboldus, D.H.J. Virtual prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (4). 1194-1198.
7. Emde, R. Development terminable and interminable - Innate and motivational factors from infancy. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69. 23-42.
8. Fogg, B.J. and Nass, C. Silicon sycophants: The effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies.
9. Gallup Jr, G.G. Self awareness and the emergence of mind in primates. American Journal of Primatology, 2 (3). 237-248.
10. Gong, L. How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (4). 1494-1509.
11. Hamilton, D. A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping. in Berkowitz, L. ed. Advances in experimental social psychology, Elsevier, New York: NY, 1979.
12. Hinds, P.J., Roberts, T.L. and Jones, H. Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (1). 151-181.
13. Lee, E.J. I like you, but I won't listen to you: Effects of rationality on affective and behavioral responses to computers that flatter. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 67 (8). 628-638.
14. Lee, K.M., Park, N. and Song, H. Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Human Communication Research, 31 (4). 538-563.
15. Lewis, M. Self-conscious emotions: Embarrassment, pride, shame, and guilt. in Lewis, M. and Haviland, J. eds. Handbook of emtions, 1993.
16. Lim, S. and Reeves, B. Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 68 (1-2). 57-68.
17. Moon, Y. and Nass, C. Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49 (1). 79-94.
18. Morkes, J., Kernal, H.K. and Nass, C. Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computermediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 14 (4). 395-435.
19. Nass, C., Fogg, B.J. and Moon, Y. Can computers be teammates? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45 (6). 669-678.
20. Nass, C. and Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1). 81-103.
21. Nass, C., Moon, Y. and Carney, P. Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer Based Interviewing Systems1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (5). 1093-1109.
22. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B.J., Reeves, B. and Dryer, C. Can computer personalities be human personalities? Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 1995, 228-229.
23. Nass, C. and Steuer, J. Voices, boxes, and sources of messages. Human Communication Research, 19 (4). 504-527.
24. Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1993.
25. Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L. and Waters, K. Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior, 15 (2). 123-142.
26. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The media equation: How people respond to computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
27. Reysen, S. Construction and validation of measures of perceived honesty and perceived expertise the 54th annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association Conference, Kansas City, MO, 2008.
28. Reysen, S. Construction of a new scale: The Reysen likability scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 33. 201-208.
29. Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J.K., Aronson, J.A., Nystrom, L.E. and Cohen, J.D. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300 (5626). 1755.
30. Schaumburg, H. Computers as tools or as social actors? The users' perspective on anthropomorphic agents. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 10 (1-2). 217-234.
31. Shneiderman, B. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer-interaction. Addison Wesley Longman, 1998.
32. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Addison Wesley, London, 2004.
33. Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J.H. and Waters, K. When the interface is a face. Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (2). 97-124.
34. Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y. and Groner, R. Playing online games against computer-vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (5). 2274-2291.