Current knowledge about the hydrophilic and nanostructured SLActive surface

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry

Volumn 3, Issue , 2011, Pages 59-67

  Wennerberg, Ann ^a,b   Galli, Silvia ^b   Albrektsson, Tomas ^b,c  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical results; In vitro; In vivo; SLActive; Surface

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054104664     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/cciden.s15949     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Baier RE, Meyer AE, Natiella JR, Natiella RR, Carter JM. Surface properties determine bioadhesive outcomes: Methods and results. J Biomed Mater Res. 1984;18:337-355. (Pubitemid 14101918)
2. Baier RE, De Palma VA. Electrode-less glow discharge cleaning and activation of high energy substrates to ensure their freedom from organic contamination and their receptivity for adhesives and coatings. Technical Report CAQL NO 176, Internal Research Work Authorization No 7145-7176. Buffalo NY: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory Inc, Cornell University; 1970.
3. Carlsson LV, Albrektsson T, Berman C. Bone response to plasma- cleaned titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:199-204.
4. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74:49-58. (Pubitemid 41099250)
5. Schwarz F, Wieland M, Schwartz R, et al. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88:544-557.
6. Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Wieland M, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZY. The influence of surface energy on early adherent events of osteoblast on titanium substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93:289-296.
7. Wall I, Donos N, Carlqvist K, Jones F, Brett P. Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro. Bone. 2009;45:17-26.
8. Mamalis AA, Silvestros SS. Analysis of osteoblastic gene expression in the early human mesenchymal cell response to a chemically modified implant surface: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:530-537.
9. Qu Z, Rausch-Fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. The initial attachment and subsequent behavior regulation of osteoblasts by dental implant surface modification. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007;1;82:658-668. (Pubitemid 47258580)
10. Masaki C, Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Stanford C. Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:650-656. (Pubitemid 43951427)
11. Klein MO, Bijelic A, Toyoshima T, et al. Long-term response of osteogenic cells on micron and submicron- scale-structured hydrophilic titanium surfaces: Sequence of cell proliferation and cell differentiation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:642-649.
12. Mamalis AA, Markopoulou C, Vrotsos I, Koutsilirieris M. Chemical modification of an implant surface increases osteogenesis and simultaneously reduces osteoclastogenesis: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:619-626.
13. Fang M, Olivares-Navarrete R, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. The role of phospholipase D in osteoblast response to titanium surface microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93: 897-909.
14. Rausch-Fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2008;24:102-110. (Pubitemid 350250813)
15. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2821-2829. (Pubitemid 46482664)
16. Vlacic-Zischke J, Hamlet SM, Friis T, Tonetti MS, Ivanovski S. The influence of surface microroughness and hydrophilicity of titanium on the up-regulation of TGFb/BMP signalling in osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2011;32:665-671.
17. Kou PM, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD, Babensee JE. Dendritic cell responses to surface properties of clinical titanium surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:1354-1363.
18. Raines AL, Olivares-Navarrete R, Wieland M, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Regulation of angiogenesis during osseointegration by titanium surface microstructure and energy. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4909-4917.
19. An N, Schedle A, Wieland M, Andrukhov O, Matejka M, Rausch- Fan X. Proliferation, behavior, and cytokine gene expression of human umbilical vascular endothelial cells in response to different titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93:364-372.
20. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004;83:529-533. (Pubitemid 41766080)
21. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: A histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:233-241.
22. Abdel-Haq J, Karabuda CZ, Arisan V, Mutlu Z, Kürkçü M. Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: An experimental pilot study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:265-274.
23. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:481-488.
24. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA® titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:245-255.
25. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M, et al. Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2007;78:2171-2184.
26. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78: 291-297. (Pubitemid 44061066)
27. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified ( SLActives) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:78-86. (Pubitemid 44952523)
28. Schwarz F, Sager M, Ferrari D, Herten M, Wieland M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at non-submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActives) and conventional SLA titanium implants: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:64-75.
29. Schwarz F, Sager M, Kadelka I, Ferrari D, Becker J. Influence of titanium implant surface characteristics on bone regeneration in dehiscence- type defects: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37:466-473.
30. Al-Hamdan K, Al-Moaber SH, Junker R, Jansen JA. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: A histological and histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:399-405.
31. Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Zhang ZY, Wieland M, Liu X. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20: 247-253.
32. Liñares A, Mardas N, Dard M, Donos N. Effect of immediate or delayed loading following immediate placement of implants with a modified surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:38-46.
33. Mardas N, Schwarz F, Petrie A, Hakimi AR, Donos N. The effect of SLActive surface in guided bone formation in osteoporotic-like conditions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:406-415.
34. Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:349-356.
35. Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Lang NP. The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:357-364.
36. Donos N, Hamlet S, Lang NP, et al. Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:365-372.
37. Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA® surface: A randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:755-760.
38. Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:605-611.
39. Karabuda ZC, Abdel-Haq J, Arisan V. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: A prospective 15-month evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:840-849.
40. Heberer S, Kilic S, Hossamo J, Raguse JD, Nelson K. Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acidetched implants: Preliminary results of a split-mouth study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:546-551.
41. Ganeles J, Zöllner A, Jackowski J, ten Bruggenkate C, Beagle J, Guerra F. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:1119-1128.
42. Zöllner A, Ganeles J, Korostoff J, Guerra F, Krafft T, Brägger U. Immediate and early non-occlusal loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: Interim results from a prospective multicenter randomizedcontrolled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:442-450.
43. Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:338-347.
44. Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Brägger U, Buser D. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible. J Periodontol. 2010;81:809-818.
45. Morton D, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, et al. Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: Two-year results of a prospective two-center study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12:9-17.
46. Roccuzzo M, Wilson TG, Jr. A prospective study of 3 weeks' loading of chemically modified titanium implants in the maxillary molar region: 1-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:65-72.
47. Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: A prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:937-943.
48. Lindgren C, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010. [Epub ahead of print.]
49. Marchetti C, Felice P, Lizio G, Rossi F. Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional graft and immediate loading of delayed modified SLActive surface dental implants for rehabilitation of extremely atrophied maxilla: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1486-1494.
50. Stoker GT, Wismeijer D. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: A new treatment protocol. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009. [Epub ahead of print.]
51. Al-Nawas B, Brägger U, Meijer HJ, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Titanium-13Zirconium versus Titanium Grade IV small-diameter bone level implants in edentulous mandibles - Results from a 1-year observation period. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011. [Epub ahead of print.]
52. Bergkvist G, Koh KJ, Sahlholm S, Klintström E, Lindh C. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:321-328.
53. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: A review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:63-74.