A prospective study of 3 weeks' loading of chemically modified titanium implants in the maxillary molar region: 1-year results

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 65-72

  Roccuzzo, Mario ^a,b   Wilson Jr , Thomas G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Early loading; Healing time; Osseointegration; Osteotome technique; Posterior maxilla

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; OSTEOTOMY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WETTABILITY;

ADULT; AGED; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL RESTORATION, TEMPORARY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WETTABILITY;

EID: 67649216542     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split-mouth comparative study. One-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:572-578.
2. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al.The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface. Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
3. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, Belser UC, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:659-666.
4. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1 -year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:142-149.
5. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-638.
6. Roccuzzo M, Aglietta M, Bunino M, Bonino L.Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants. A randomized controlled double-blind split-mouth study: Five-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008 Feb; 19:148-152.
7. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:79-84.
8. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology.Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25.
9. Roccuzzo M,WilsonT.A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks' loading of SLA implants in the posterior max- illa:One-year results.Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:502-507.
10. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
11. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:78-86.
12. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007,18:481-488.
13. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:291-297.
14. OatesTW,Valderrama P Bischof M,et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: A randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:755-760.
15. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(suppl):109-113.
16. O'LearyTJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE.The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972;43:38-42.
17. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975,22:229-235.
18. Taylor TD, Belser U, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 (suppl):101-107.
19. Fiorellini JP,Weber HP. Clinical trials on the prognosis of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:98-108.
20. Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants:Their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 (suppl):146-155.
21. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different times for loading dental implants [review].Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003,(1 ):CD003878.
22. Stavropoulos A, Nyengaard JR, Lang NP, Karring T. Immediate loading of single SLA implants: Drilling vs. osteotomes for the preparation of the implant site. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:55-65.
23. Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J, et al. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:595-602.
24. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds).Tissue-lntegrated Prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985.
25. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: Clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:1-7.
26. Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Mai TN. Preliminary results of a mul- ticenter study evaluating a chemically enhanced surface for machined commercially pure titanium implants.J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:379-386.
27. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone:A 5-year analysis.J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4.
28. Bass SL,Triplett RG.The effects of preoperative resorption and jaw anatomy on implant success. A report of 303 cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:193-198.
29. Bahat O.Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: Report of 732 consecutive Nobel- pharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:151-161.
30. Friberg B Jemt T, Lekholm U.Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of the completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:142-146.
31. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxilla: Clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:646-653.
32. Nocini PF, Albanese M, Fior A, De Santis D. Implant placement in the maxillary tuberosity:The Summers technique performed with modified osteotomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:273-278.
33. Listgarten MA. Clinical trials of endosseous implants: Issues in analysis and interpretation. Ann Periodontol 1997;2:299-313.
34. Vanden Bogaerde L, Pedretti G, Dellacasa P, Mozzati M, Rangert B,Wendelhag I. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Brånemark System TiUnite implants: An 18-month prospective clinical multicen- ter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:121-129.
35. Weber HP, Fiorellini JP, Jeffcoat MC. Clinical trials on placement of implants in existing bone. Ann Periodontol 1997;2:315-328.