Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 78, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 291-297

  Ferguson, S J ^a   Broggini, N ^a   Wieland, M ^b   De Wild, M ^b   Rupp, F ^a,c   Geis Gerstorfer, J ^c   Cochran, D L ^d   Buser, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical testing; Dental implant; Interface; Osseointegration; Surface chemistry; Wettability

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; DENTAL PROSTHESES; PROTEINS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; TORQUE;

BIOMECHANICAL TESTING; DENTAL IMPLANT; INTERFACE; OSSEOINTEGRATION; WETTABILITY;

TITANIUM COMPOUNDS;

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; FRACTURE HEALING; IMPLANT; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WETTABILITY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE SCREWS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 33745934441     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30678     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
2. Ratner BD, Porter SC. Surfaces in biology and biomaterials; description and characterization. In: Brash JLW, editor. Interfacial Phenomena and Bioproducts. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996. p 57-83.
3. Buser D. Titanium for dental applications (II): Implants with roughened surfaces. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p 876-888.
4. Wieland M, Sittig C, Brunette DM, Textor M, Spencer ND. Measurement and evaluation of the chemical composition and topography of titanium implant surfaces. In: Davies JE, editor. Bone Engineering. Toronto: Em Squared; 2000. p 163-182.
5. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
6. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
7. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, editors. Advances in Biomaterials, Vol. 9: Clinical Implant Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1990. p 309-314.
8. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, Snetivy D, Nolte LP. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
9. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-332.
10. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:572-578.
11. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
12. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, Belser UC, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:659-666.
13. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially endentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16(6):631-638.
14. Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1419-1425.
15. Textor M, Sittig C, Frauchiger V, Tosatti S, Brunette DM. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p 171-230.
16. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska M, deWild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76(2):323-334.
17. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Cochran DL, Simpson J, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblastlike MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:55-63.
18. Yahyapour N, Eriksson C, Malmberg P, Nygren H. Thrombin, kallikrein and complement C5b-9 adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium and glass after short time exposure to whole blood. Biomaterials 2004;25:3171-3176.
19. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A, Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
20. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:49-58.
21. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
22. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, Valiquette N. Dental implant design-Effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 199125:467-483.
23. 2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
24. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
25. Vörös J, Wieland M, Ruiz-Taylor L, Textor M, Brunette DM. Characterization of titanium surfaces. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomsen P, editors. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p 87-144.
26. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
27. Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Modulation of osteogenesis via implant surface design. In: Davies JE, editor. Bone Engineering. Toronto: Em Squared; 2000. p 232-239.
28. Steinemann SG. Titanium-the material of choice? Periodontol 2000 1998;17:7-21.
29. Morel F, Hering J. Principles and Applications of Aquatic Chemistry. New York: Wiley; 1993.
30. Stumm W. Chemistry of the Solid-Water Interface. New York: Wiley; 1992.
31. 2-electrolyte interface. Colloids Surf 1982;5:363-368.
32. Schmidt M, Steinemann S. XPS studies of amino acids adsorbed on titanium dioxide surfaces. Fresenius J Anal Chem 1991;341:412-415.
33. Rupp F, Axmann D, Ziegler C, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Adsorption/desorption phenomena on pure and Teflon AF-coated titania surfaces studied by dynamic contact angle analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:567-578.
34. Garcia AJ, Keselowsky BG. Biomimetic surfaces for control of cell adhesion to facilitate bone formation. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2002;12:151-162.
35. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:247-259.
36. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, Garcia AJ. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials 2004;25:5947-5954.
37. Eriksson C, Nygren H, Ohlson K. Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: Cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 2004;25:4759-4766.
38. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Rehbein D, Axmann D, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium implant modifications. Biomaterials 2004;25:1429-1438.