Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: A randomized pilot study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 755-760

  Oates, Thomas W ^a   Valderrama, Pilar ^a   Bischof, Mark ^b   Nedir, Rabah ^b   Jones, Archie ^a   Simpson, James ^c   Toutenburg, Helge ^d   Cochran, David L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b Clinique Dentaire de Chauderon   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Implant stability; Implant surface chemistry; Resonance frequency analysis

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL ETCHING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIBRATION; WOUND HEALING;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIBRATION; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 35648956721     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: Surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:349-359.
2. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
3. Kim HJ, Kim SH, Kim MS, et al.Varying Ti-6Al-4V surface roughness induces different early morphologic and molecular responses in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:366-373.
4. Lossdorfer S, Schwartz Z, Wang L, et al. Microrough implant surface topographies increase osteogenesis by reducing osteoclast formation and activity. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;70A:361-369.
5. Schliephake H, Scharnweber D, Dard M, Sewing A, Aref A, Roessler S. Functionalization of dental implant surfaces using adhesion molecules. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;73:88-96.
6. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:659-666.
7. Roach P, Farrar D, Perry CC. Interpretation of protein adsorption: Surface-induced conformational changes. J Am Chem Soc 2005;22:8168-8173.
8. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
9. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanka N, de Wild M, Wieland M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophillcity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76A:323-334.
10. Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability In vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:641-651.
11. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-267.
12. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-233.
13. Lachmann S, Laval JY, Jager B, et al. Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Part 2: Periimplant bone loss follow-up. An In vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell instruments.Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17: 80-84.
14. Huang HM, Chiu CL,Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;4:437-443.
15. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
16. Chow GC. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 1960;52:211-222.
17. Johnston J, DiNardo J. Econometric Methods.McGraw-Hill, 1997.
18. Toutenburg H. Statistical Analysis of Designed Experiments (ed 2). New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
19. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-lntegrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:199-209.
20. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:529-539.
21. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999:28:266-272.