Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year Results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 81, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 809-818

  Bornstein, Michael M ^a   Wittneben, Julia Gabriela ^a   Bragger, Urs ^a   Buser, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Dental implants; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL ETCHING; EDENTULOUSNESS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLAR; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953274080     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090727     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
2. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealy PF. Effects of synthetic micro and nano-structured surfaces on cell behaviour. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-588.
3. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Review. Biomaterials 1997;18:1573-1583.
4. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, eds. Clinical Implant Materials (Advances in Biomaterials, No. 9). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1990:309-314.
5. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini J, Fox C, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
6. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231.
7. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws, blasted with 25-and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:251-260.
8. Wennerberg A, Ektebassi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-494.
9. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histomorphometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11.
10. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
11. 2-blasted titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:77-84.
12. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.
13. Vörös J, Wieland M, Ruiz-Taylor L, Textor M, Brunette DM. Characterization of titanium surfaces. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomson P, eds. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001: 87-144.
14. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
15. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto Study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-457.
16. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin-Schaffner T, Marti P, Geering AH. Periimplant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A five-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:9-18.
17. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Longterm evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
18. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:572-578.
19. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153.
20. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, Belser UC, Buser D. Early loading of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:659-666.
21. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-638.
22. Cochran D, Oates T, Morton D, Jones A, Buser D, Peters F. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid etched surface. J Periodontol 2007;78:974-982.
23. Textor M, Sittig C, Frauchiger V, Tosatti S, Brunette DM. Properties and biological significance of natural oxide films on titanium and its alloys. In: Brunette DM, Tengvall P, Textor M, Thomson P, eds. Titanium in Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2001: 171-230.
24. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, de Wild M, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:323-334.
25. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-533.
26. Ferguson SJ, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:291-297.
27. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). Physical Status Classification. Available at: http://www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm. Accessed October 30, 2009.
28. Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, 1st edition. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985: 195-205.
29. Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(Suppl. 1):83-100.
30. Montrose J. Indications and techniques for surgical indexing at stage I implant surgery. Dent Today 2004;23:106-109.
31. Mombelli A, van Oosten MAC, Schürch E Jr., Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-151.
32. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40.
33. Weber HP, Buser D, Fiorellini JP, Williams RC. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:181-188.
34. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org. Accessed February 5, 2010.
35. Aparicio C, Rangert B, Sennerby L. Immediate/early loading of dental implants: A report from the Sociedad Española de Implantes World Congress consensus meeting in Barcelona, Spain, 2002. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2003;5:57-60.
36. Cochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(Suppl.):109-113.
37. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Willings M, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; Apr18 (2) : CD003878.
38. Weber HP, Morton D, Gallucci GO, Roccuzzo M, Cordaro L, Grütter L. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl.):180-183.
39. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(Suppl. 3):197-212.
40. Bornstein MM, Halbritter S, Harnisch H, Weber HP, Buser D. A retrospective analysis of patients referred for implant placement to a specialty clinic: Indications, surgical procedures, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1109-1116.
41. Cordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Implant loading protocols for the partially edentulous posterior mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(Suppl.):158-168.
42. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:142-149.
43. Schwarz F, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, et al. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:544-557.
44. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74:49-58.
45. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sand-blasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:233-241.
46. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early osseous integration at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants: Preliminary results of a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:481-488.
47. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M, et al. Effects of surface hydrophylicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at nonsubmerged titanium implants. An immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Periodontol 2007;78:2171-2184.
48. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Sager M, Herten M, Wieland M, Becker J. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at nonsubmerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants. An immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:64-75.
49. Wall I, Donos N, Carlqvist K, Jones F, Brett P. Modified titanium surfaces promote accelerated osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Bone 2009;45:17-26.
50. Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, et al. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:755-760.
51. Lai H-C, Zhang Z-Y, Wang F, Zhuang L-F, Liu X. Resonance frequency analysis of stability on ITI implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting: A 5-month prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:469-475.
52. Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acidetched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:338-347.
53. Zöllner A, Ganeles J, Korostoff J, Guerra F, Krafft T, Brägger U. Immediate and early non-occlusal loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: Interim results from a prospective multicenter randomized-controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:442-450.
54. Ganeles J, Zöllner A, Jackowski J, ten Bruggenkate C, Beagle J, Guerra F. Immediate and early loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: 1-year results from a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1119-1128.
55. Morton D, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, et al. Early loading after 21 days of healing of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 2-year results of a prospective 2-center study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:9-17.
56. Stoker GT, Wismeijer D. Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: A new treatment protocol. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 (e-pub ahead of print).
57. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Wieland M, Dard M, Becker J. Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of initial and early subepithelial connective tissue attachment at chemically modified and conventional SLA titanium implants. A pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11:245-255.
58. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:153-161.
59. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: A 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:109-117.
60. Bornstein MM, Chappuis V, von Arx T, Buser D. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation (SFE) procedures. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1034-1043.