PPiClust: Effect clustering of 3D protein-protein interaction interfaces

Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 415-433

  Aung, Zeyar ^a   Tan, Soon Heng ^a   Ng, See Kiong ^a,b,c,d   Tan, Kian Lee ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D interaction interfaces; Efficient clustering; Protein Protein interaction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPLEX FORMATION; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

PROTEIN;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 46049099795     PISSN: 02197200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720008003485     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Aung Z, Tan SH, Ng SK, Tan KL, Uncovering the structural basis of protein interactions with efficient clustering of 3-D interaction interfaces, in Proc 6th Int Conf Computational Systems Bioinformatics (CSB'07), pp. 287-297, 2007.
2. Ng SK, Zhang Z, Tan SH, Integrative approach for computationally inferring protein domain interactions, Bioinformatics 19 923-929, 2003.
3. Neduva V, Russell RB, Linear motifs: Evolutionary interaction switches, FEBS Lett 579:3342-3345, 2005.
4. Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J, The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites, J Mol Biol 285:2177-2198, 1999.
5. Hu Z, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R, Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces, Proteins 39:331-342, 2000.
6. Teyra J, Doms A, Schroeder M, Pisabarro MT, SCOWLP: A web-based database for detailed characterization and visualization of protein interfaces, BMC Bioinformatics 7:104, 2006.
7. Tsai CJ, Lin SL, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R, A dataset of protein-protein interfaces generated with sequence-order-independent comparison technique, J Mol Biol 260:604-620, 1996.
8. Keskin O, Tsai CJ, Wolfson H, Nussinov R, A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein-protein interfaces and its implications, Protein Sci 13:1043-1055, 2004.
9. Mintz S, Shulman-Peleg A, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R, Generation and analysis of a protein-protein interface data set with similar chemical and spatial patterns of interactions, Proteins 61:6-20, 2005.
10. Davis FP, Sali A, PIBASE: A comprehensive database of structurally defined protein interfaces, Bioinformatics 21:1901-1907, 2005.
11. Handl J, Knowles J, Kell DB, Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis, Bioinformatics 21:3201-3212, 2005.
12. Shulman-Peleg A, personal communication, 2005.
13. Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ, Recognition of functional sites in protein structures, J Mol Biol 339:607-633, 2004.
14. Murtagh F, Heck A, Multivariate Data Analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987.
15. Holm L, Sander C, Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices, J Mol Biol 233:123-138, 1993.
16. Zachary J, Iyengar SS, Baxhen J, Content based image retrieval and information theory: A general approach, J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 52:840-852, 2001.
17. Caxugo O, Pongor S, Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison, J Mol Biol 315:887-898, 2002.
18. Choi IG, Kwon J, Kim SH, Local feature frequency profile: A method to measure structural similarity in proteins, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:3797-3802, 2004.
19. Aung Z, Fu W, Tan KL, An efficient index-based protein structure database searching method, in Proc 8th Int Conf Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA'03), pp. 311-318, 2003.
20. Dunham HM, Data Mining: Introductory and Advanced Topics, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
21. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ, Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1990.
22. http://www.unesco.org/webworld/idams/advguide/Chapt7_1_l.htm/.
23. Shannon CE, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst Tech J 27:379-423, 1948.
24. Pieper U, Eswar N, Braberg H et al., MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources, Nucleic Acids Res 32:D217-D222, 2004.
25. Tsai CJ, Xu D, Nussinov R, Structural motifs at protein-protein interfaces: Protein cores versus two-state and three-state model complexes, Protein Sci 6:1793-1805, 1997.
26. Aloy P, Pichaud M, Russell RB, Protein complexes: Structure prediction challenges for the 21st century, Curr Opin Struct Biol 15 15-22, 2005.
27. Ceol A, Chatr-aryamontri A, Santonico E, Sacco R, Castagnoli L, Cesareni G, DOMINO: A database of domain-peptide interactions, Nucleic Acids Res 35:D557-D560, 2006.
28. Puntervoll P, Linding R, Gemund C et al., ELM server: A new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins, Nucleic Acids Res 31:3625-3630, 2003.
29. Kleiger G, Grothe R, Mallick P, Eisenberg D, GXXXG and AXXXA: Common alpha-helical interaction motifs in proteins, particularly in extremophiles, Biochemistry 41:5990-5997, 2002.
30. Dombrosky-Ferlan P, Grishin A, Botelho RJ, Sampson M, Wang L, Rudert WA, Grinstein S, Corey JS, Felic (CIP4b), a novel binding partner with the Src kinase Lyn and Cdc42, localizes to the phagocytic cup, Blood 101:2804-2809, 2003.
31. Przyborski J, Lanzer M, Parasitology: The malarial secretome, Science 306:1897-1898, 2004.
32. Ravi Chandra B, Gowthaman R, Raj Akhouri R, Gupta D, Sharma A, Distribution of proline-rich (PxxP) motifs in distinct proteornes: Functional and therapeutic implications for malaria and tuberculosis, Protein Eng Des Sel 17:175-182, 2004.