A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein-protein interfaces and its implications

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1043-1055

  Keskin, Ozlem ^a,b,d   Tsai, Chung Jung ^b   Wolfson, Haim ^c   Nussinov, Ruth ^b,c,d  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data set of interfaces; Motifs, protein protein interactions; Protein binding; Protein interfaces; Protein protein association

Indexed keywords

MONOMER; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DRUG DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 1842507022     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.03484604     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arkin, M.R., Randal, M., DeLano, W.L., Hyde, J., Luong, T.N., Oslob, J.D., Raphael, D.R., Taylor, L., Wang, J., McDowell, R.S., et al. 2003. Binding of small molecules to an adaptive protein-protein interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 1603-1608.
2. Bachar, O., Fischer, D., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H. 1993. A computer vision based technique for 3-D sequence-independent structural comparison of proteins. Protein Eng. 6: 279-288.
3. Berman, H.M., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., Gilliland, G., Bhat, T.N., Weissig, H., Shindyalov, I.N., and Bourne, P.E. 2000. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 235-242.
4. Bogan, A.A. and Thorn, K.S. 1998. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 280: 1-9.
5. Brooijmans, N., Sharp, K.A., and Kuntz, I.D. 2002. Stability of macromolecular complexes. Proteins 48: 645-653.
6. Chakrabarti, P. and Janin, J. 2002. Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites. Proteins 47: 334-343.
7. Chothia, C. 1992. Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. Nature 357: 543-544.
8. Chothia, C. and Janin, J. 1975. Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature 256: 705-708.
9. Cunningham, B.C. and Wells, J.A. 1991. Rational design of receptor-specific variants of human growth hormone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 3407-3411.
10. DeLano, W.L. 2002. Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: Progress and challenges. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 14-20.
11. DeLano, W.L., Ultsch, M.H., deVos, A.M., and Wells, J.A. 2000. Convergent solution to binding at a protein-protein interface. Science 287: 1279-1283.
12. Fariselli, P., Pazos, F., Valencia, A., and Casadio, R. 2002, Prediction of protein-protein sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. Eur. J. Biochem. 269: 1356-1361.
13. Fernández, A. and Scheraga, H.A. 2003. Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 113-118.
14. Fischer, D., Wolfson, H., Lin, S.L., and Nussinov, R. 1994. Three-dimensional, sequence order-independent structural comparison of a serine protease against the crystallographic database reveals active site similarities: Potential implications to evolution and to protein folding. Protein Sci. 3: 769-778.
15. Gordon, A.E. 1981. Classification: Methods for the exploratory analysis of multivariate data. Chapman and Hall, New York.
16. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J. 1992. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919.
17. Hu, Z., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R. 2000. Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces. Proteins 39: 331-342.
18. Jones, S. and Thornton, J.M. 1996. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93: 13-20.
19. -. 1997. Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 121-132.
20. Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A.A., Aflalo, C., and Vakser, I.A. 1992. Molecular surface recognition: Determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 2195-2199.
21. Keskin, O., Bahar, I., Badretdinov, A.Y., Ptitsyn, O.B., and Jernigan, R.L. 1998. Empirical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intra-molecular and inter-molecular inter-residue interactions. Protein Sci. 7: 2578-2586.
22. Kleanthous, C. 2000. Protein-protein recognition. In Frontiers in molecular biology (ed. C. Kleanthous). Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Kuhlmann, U.C., Pommer, A.J., Moore, G.R., James, R., and Kleanthous, C. 2000. Specificity in protein-protein interactions: The structural basis for dual recognition in endonuclease colicin-immunity protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 301: 1163-1178.
24. Kumar, S. and Nussinov, R. 2001. Fluctuations in ion pairs and their stabilities in proteins. Proteins 41: 485-497.
25. Kuntz, I.D., Chen, K., Sharp, K.A., and Kollman, P.A. 1999. The maximal affinity of ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 9997-10002.
26. Lichtarge, O., Bourne, H.R., and Cohen, F.E. 1996. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257: 342-358.
27. LoConte, L., Chothia, C., and Janin, J. 1999. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 2177-2198.
28. Ma, B., Wolfson, H.J., and Nussinov, R. 2001. Protein functional epitopes: Hot spots, dynamics and combinatorial libraries. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11: 364-369.
29. Ma, B., Shatsky, M., Wolfson, H.J., and Nussinov, R. 2002. Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: A matter of pre-existing populations. Protein Sci. 11: 184-197.
30. Ma, B., Elkayam, T., Wolfson, H., and Nussinov, R, 2003. Protein-protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 5772-5777.
31. Martin, A.C.R., Orengo, C.A., Hutchinson, E.G., Jones, S., Karmirantzou, M., Laskowski, R.A., Mitchell, J.B.O., Taroni, C., and Thornton, J.M. 1998. Protein folds and functions. Structure 6: 875-884.
32. Miller, S., Janin, J., Lesk, A.M., and Chothia, C. 1987. Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 196: 641-656.
33. Moult, J. and Melamud, E. 2000. From fold to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10: 384-389.
34. Murzin, A.G., Brenner, S.E., Hubbard, T., and Chothia, C. 1995. SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol. 247: 536-540.
35. Nagano, N., Orengo, C.A., and Thornton, J.M. 2002. One fold with many functions: The evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol. 321: 741-765.
36. Nooren, I.M.A. and Thornton, J.M. 2003. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 325: 991-1018.
37. Nussinov, R. and Wolfson, H.J. 1991. Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 10495-10499.
38. Orengo, C.A., Todd, A.E., and Thornton, J.M. 1999. From protein structure to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9: 374-382.
39. Shatsky, M., Nussinov, R., and Wolfson, H, 2002. Multiprot: A multiple protein structural alignment. In Proceedings of ALGO 02. Algorithms in Bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2452, pp. 235-250.
40. -. 2003. A method for simultaneous alignment of multiple protein structures. Proteins (in press).
41. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressivemultiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
42. Thornton, J.M., Todd, A.E., Milburn, D., Borkakoti, N., and Orengo, C.A. 2000. From structure to function: Approaches and limitations. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7: 991-994.
43. Todd, A.E., Orengo, C.A., and Thornton, J.M. 2002. Sequence and structural differences between enzyme and nonenzyme homologs. Structure 10: 1435-1451.
44. Tramontano, A. and Macchiato, M.F. 1994. A transportable interactive package for the statistical analysis and handling of sequence data. Comput. Biol. Med. 18: 113-122.
45. Tsai, C.J. and Nussinov, R. 1997. Hydrophobic folding units at protein-protein interfaces: Implication to protein folding and to protein-protein association. Protein Sci. 6: 1426-1437.
46. Tsai, C.J., Lin, S.L., Wolfson, H.J., and Nussinov, R. 1996. A dataset of protein-protein interfaces generated with a sequence-order-independent comparison technique. J. Mol. Biol. 260: 604-620.
47. -. 1997. Studies of protein-protein interfaces: Statistical analysis of the hydrophobic effect. Protein Sci. 6: 53-64.
48. Tsai, C.J., Xu, D., and Nussinov, R. 1998a. Structural motifs at protein-protein interfaces: Protein cores versus two-state and three-state model complexes. Protein Sci. 6: 1793-1805.
49. -. 1998b. Protein folding via binding and vice versa. Fold. Des. 3: R71-R80.
50. Valdar, W.S.J. and Thornton, J.M. 2001a. Conservation helps to identify biologically relevant crystal contacts. J. Mol. Biol. 313: 339-416.
51. -. 2001b. Protein-protein interfaces: Analysis of amino acid conservation in homodimers. Proteins 42: 108-124.
52. Wallis, R., Leung, K.Y., Osborne, M.J., James, R., Moore, G.R., and Kleanthous, C. 1998. Specificity in protein-protein recognition: Conserved Im9 residues are the major determinants of stability in the colicin E9 DNase-Im9 complex. Biochemistry 37: 476-485.
53. Wells, J.A. and deVos, A.M. 1996. Hematopoietic receptor complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65: 609-634.
54. Xu, D., Tsai, C.J., and Nussinov, R. 1998. Mechanism and evolution of protein dimerization. Protein Sci. 7: 533-544.