CT Colonography to exclude colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2029-2038

  Badiani, Sarit ^a   Hernandez, Silvia Tomas ^a   Karandikar, Sharad ^a   Roy Choudhury, Shuvro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barium enema; Colorectal cancer; CT Colonography; Sensitivity; Symptomatic; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

IOPAMIDOL;

ABDOMINAL MASS; ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; BARIUM ENEMA; CALCULATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER REGISTRY; CECUM; COLON; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL DISEASE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION HABIT; DESCENDING COLON; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; GOLD STANDARD; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX RATIO; SIGMOID; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SYMPTOM; TRANSVERSE COLON; TREATMENT INDICATION; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; BARIUM; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ENEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80053906309     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2151-1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. JS Terhaar Sive Droste ME Craanen RW van der Hulst, et al. 2009 Colonoscopic yield of colorectal neoplasia in daily clinical practice World J Gastroenterol 15 1085 1092 19266601 10.3748/wjg.15.1085
2. RJ Loffeld AB van der Putten 2009 The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure Digestion 80 267 270 19923819 10.1159/000236030 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MfhtFGqsA%3D%3D
3. CJ Bowles R Leicester C Romaya E Swarbrick CB Williams O Epstein 2004 A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53 277 283 14724164 10.1136/gut.2003.016436 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FlsVyitQ%3D%3D
4. PJ Pickhardt AJ Taylor DV Gopal 2006 Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection Gastroenterology 130 1582 1587 16697721 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.01.044
5. JE East BP Saunders D Burling D Boone S Halligan SA Taylor 2007 Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: effect of varying field of view and retrograde view Am J Gastroenterol 102 2529 2535 17640320 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01429.x
6. A Berrington de Gonzalez KP Kim J Yee 2010 CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20 279 291 20451817 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.003 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3czitFOgtw%3D%3D
7. Khan JS, Moran BJ (2009) Iatrogenic perforation at colonic imaging. Colorectal Dis
8. Yee J, Sadda S, Aslam R, Yeh B Extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20:305-322
9. DJ Tolan EM Armstrong AH Chapman 2007 Replacing barium enema with CT colonography in patients older than 70 years: the importance of detecting extracolonic abnormalities AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 1104 1111 17954647 10.2214/AJR.07.2026
10. M Almond D Bowley C Hendrickse S Roy-Choudhury SS Karandikar 2010 Trends in whole colonic imaging Acta Radiol 51 708 20438291 10.3109/02841851.2010. 487073
11. VA Fisichella M Hellstrom 2010 Survey update on implementation, indications, and technical performance of computed tomography colonography in Sweden Acta Radiol 51 4 8 19961399 10.3109/02841850903292735
12. MH Svensson E Svensson A Lasson M Hellstrom 2002 Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease Radiology 222 337 345 11818597 10.1148/radiol.2222010669
13. SA Taylor S Halligan BP Saunders P Bassett M Vance CI Bartram 2003 Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 913 921 14500202
14. S Jensch AH de Vries J Peringa, et al. 2008 CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population Radiology 247 122 132 18292475 10.1148/radiol.2471070439
15. DH Kim PJ Pickhardt AJ Taylor, et al. 2007 CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia N Engl J Med 357 1403 1412 17914041 10.1056/NEJMoa070543 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFeisLvF
16. PJ Pickhardt JR Choi I Hwang, et al. 2003 Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349 2191 2200 14657426 10.1056/NEJMoa031618 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXps1SqtL0%3D
17. CD Johnson MH Chen AY Toledano, et al. 2008 Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers N Engl J Med 359 1207 1217 18799557 10.1056/NEJMoa0800996 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFGjt7fI
18. PJ Pickhardt SM Wise DH Kim 2010 Positive predictive value for polyps detected at screening CT colonography Eur Radiol 20 1651 1656 20069423 10.1007/s00330-009-1704-z
19. Y Ozsunar G Coskun N Delibas B Uz V Yukselen 2009 Diagnostic accuracy and tolerability of contrast enhanced CT colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with increased risk for colorectal cancer Eur J Radiol 71 513 518 18597964 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.013
20. TJ White GR Avery N Kennan AM Syed JE Hartley JR Monson 2009 Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer-a prospective trial of 150 patients Colorectal Dis 11 138 145 18462241 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01554.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FntVehtg%3D%3D
21. DR McArthur H Mehrzad R Patel, et al. 2010 CT colonography for synchronous colorectal lesions in patients with colorectal cancer: initial experience Eur Radiol 20 621 629 19727743 10.1007/s00330-009-1589-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3c7gs1Wluw%3D%3D
22. ME Zalis MA Barish JR Choi, et al. 2005 CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal Radiology 236 3 9 15987959 10.1148/radiol.2361041926
23. S Thomas J Atchley A Higginson 2009 Audit of the introduction of CT colonography for detection of colorectal carcinoma in a non-academic environment and its implications for the national bowel cancer screening programme Clin Radiol 64 142 147 19103343 10.1016/j.crad.2008.10.005 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1M%2FgslOmtg%3D%3D
24. DJ Connolly ZC Traill HS Reid SJ Copley DJ Nolan 2002 The double contrast barium enema: a retrospective single centre audit of the detection of colorectal carcinomas Clin Radiol 57 29 32 11798199 10.1053/crad.2001.0724
25. GA Smith PJ O'Dwyer 2001 Sensitivity of double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms Surg Endosc 15 649 652 11591961 10.1007/s004640000372 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksV2lsw%3D%3D
26. S Halligan DG Altman SA Taylor, et al. 2005 CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting Radiology 237 893 904 16304111 10.1148/radiol.2373050176
27. E Neri P Giusti L Battolla, et al. 2002 Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy Radiology 223 615 619 12034925 10.1148/radiol.2233010928
28. M Sabanli A Balasingam W Bailey T Eglinton P Hider FA Frizelle 2010 Computed tomographic colonography in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer Br J Surg 97 1291 1294 20602504 10.1002/bjs.7098 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cnmtFyisA%3D%3D
29. M Leaper MJ Johnston M Barclay BR Dobbs FA Frizelle 2004 Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy Endoscopy 36 499 503 15202045 10.1055/s-2004-814399 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3pvFKrtw%3D%3D
30. S McDonald P Lyall L Israel R Coates F Frizelle 2001 Why barium enemas fail to identify colorectal cancers ANZ J Surg 71 631 633 11736819 10.1046/j.1445-1433.2001.02223.x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnovFOltQ%3D%3D
31. H Singh Z Nugent AA Demers CN Bernstein 2010 Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in manitoba: a population-based study Am J Gastroenterol 105 2588 2596 20877348 10.1038/ajg.2010.390
32. B Bressler LF Paszat C Vinden C Li J He L Rabeneck 2004 Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis Gastroenterology 127 452 456 15300577 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.032
33. Aunt Minnie. SIGGAR trial results a win-win for virtual colonoscopy (2010). Available via http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?sec=ser&sub= def&pag=dis&ItemID=92515. Access date 23 Feb 2011
34. PJ Pickhardt JH Choi 2003 Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 799 805 12933484
35. PJ Pickhardt AD Lee AJ Taylor, et al. 2007 Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 1451 1456 18029884 10.2214/AJR.07.2291
36. SA Taylor S Halligan D Burling, et al. 2004 CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance Eur Radiol 14 1025 1033 14872280 10.1007/s00330-004-2262-z
37. PJ Pickhardt DH Kim RJ Meiners, et al. 2010 Colorectal and extracolonic cancers detected at screening CT colonography in 10,286 asymptomatic adults Radiology 255 83 88 20308446 10.1148/radiol.09090939
38. MH Liedenbaum AH de Vries AF van Rijn, et al. 2010 CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population Abdom Imaging 35 661 668 19888629 10.1007/s00261-009-9586-8
39. HJ Kim SH Park PJ Pickhardt, et al. 2010 CT colonography for combined colonic and extracolonic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer Radiology 257 697 704 20876390 10.1148/radiol.10100385
40. A Laghi R Iannaccone I Carbone, et al. 2002 Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia Endoscopy 34 441 446 12048624 10.1055/s-2002-31999 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zgs1ahsA%3D%3D