Extracolonic findings at CT colonography

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 305-322

  Yee, Judy ^a   Sadda, Srikant ^b   Aslam, Rizwan ^a   Yeh, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

AAA; Colorectal cancer; CTC; Extracolonic findings

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ABDOMEN; ANXIETY; COLON CANCER; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST CONTROL; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS;

EID: 77952564691     PISSN: 10525157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.02.013     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Lesperance K., Andersen C., Singh N., et al. Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective. J Vasc Surg 2008, 47:1165-1170.
2. United States Preventive Services Task Force Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2005, 142:198-202.
3. Lee E., Pickett E., Hedayati N., et al. Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) act. J Vasc Surg 2009, 49:1107-1111.
4. Kyriakides C., Byrne J., Green S., et al. Screening of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a pragmatic approach. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000, 82:59-63.
5. Chervu A., Clagett G.P., Valentine R.J., et al. Role of physical examination in the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery 1995, 117:454-457.
6. Nevitt M.P., Ballard D.J., Hallett J.W. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a population-based study. N Engl J Med 1989, 321:1009-1014.
7. Johansson G., Swedenborg J. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a study of incidence and mortality. Br J Surg 1986, 73:101-103.
8. Wilmink T., Quick C., Hubbard C., et al. The influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1999, 30:203-208.
9. Tsui K., Shvarts O., Smith R., et al. Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors. J Urol 2000, 163:426-430.
10. Homma Y., Kawabe K., Kitamura T., et al. Increased incidental detection and reduced mortality in renal cancer: recent retrospective analysis at eight institutions. Int J Urol 1995, 2:77-80.
11. Sweeney J.P., Thornhill J.A., Graiger R., et al. Incidentally discovered renal cell carcinoma: pathologic features, survival trends and implications for treatment. Br J Urol 1996, 78:351-353.
12. Silverman S.G., Israel G.M., Herts B., et al. Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 2008, 249:16-31.
13. Bosniak M.A., Rofsky N.M. Problems in the detection and characterization of small renal masses. Radiology 1996, 198:638-641.
14. Berland L. Incidental extracolonic findings on CT colonography: the impending deluge and its implications. J Am Coll Radiol 2009, 6:14-20.
15. Westbrook J.I., Braithwaite J., McIntosh J.H. The outcomes for patients with incidental lesions: serendipitous or iatrogenic?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998, 171:1193-1196.
16. Lerman C., Trock B., Rimer B.K., et al. Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychol 1991, 10:259-267.
17. ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. Practice guidelines and technical standards 2009 2009, 295-299. American College of Radiology, Reston (VA).
18. Yee J., Kumar N.N., Hung R.K., et al. Comparison of supine, prone and both supine and prone scans in CT colonography. Radiology 2003, 226:653-661.
19. van Gelder R.E., Venema H.W., Serlie I.W., et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002, 224:25-33.
20. Macari M., Bini E.J., Xue X., et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002, 224:383-392.
21. Iannaccone R., Laghi A., Catalano C., et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003, 229:775-781.
22. Iannaccone R., Catalano C., Mangiapane F., et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 2005, 237:927-937.
23. Iannaccone R., Laghi A., Catalano C., et al. Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol 2003, 13:1297-1302.
24. Johnston K.W., Rutherford R.B., Tilson M.D., et al. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on Reporting Standards for Arterial Aneurysms, Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2001, 13:452-458.
25. Zalis M., Barish M., Choi R., et al. CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): a consensus statement. Radiology 2005, 236:3-9.
26. Hara A.K., Johnson C.D., MacCarty R.L., et al. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 2000, 215:353-357.
27. Edwards J.T., Wood C.J., Mendelson R.M., et al. Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: implications for screening programs. Am J Gastroenterol 2001, 96:3009-3012.
28. Gluecker T.M., Johnson C.D., Wilson L.A., et al. Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence ad cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:911-916.
29. Pickhardt P.J., Choi R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003, 349:2191-2200.
30. Ginnerup Pedersen B., Rosenkilde M., Christiansen T.E., et al. Extracolonic findings at computed tomography colonography are a challenge. Gut 2003, 52:1744-1747.
31. Hellstrom M., Svensson M.H., Lasson A. Extracolonic and incidental findings on CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004, 182:631-638.
32. Rajapaksa R.C., Macari M., Bini E. Prevalence and impact of extracolonic findings in patients undergoing CT colonography. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004, 38:767-771.
33. Chin M., Mendelson R., Edwards J., et al. Computed tomographic colonography: prevalence, nature, and clinical significance of extracolonic findings in a community screening program. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:2771-2776.
34. Yee J., Kumar N., Godara S., et al. Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 2005, 236:519-526.
35. Pickhardt P.J., Hanson M.E., Vanness D.J., et al. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology 2008, 249:151-159.
36. Flicker M., Tsoukas A.T., Hazra A., et al. Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008, 32:497-503.
37. Kimberly J., Phillips C., Santago P., et al. Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: an important consideration in asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2009, 24(1):69-73.
38. Stitt I.A., Stany M.P., Moser R.P., et al. Incidental gynecological findings on computed tomographic colonography: prevalence and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2009, 115:138-141.
39. Johnson C.D., Chen M.H., Toledano A.Y., et al. The National CT colonography trial: multicenter assessment of accuracy for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1207-1217.
40. Xiong T., Richardson M., Woodroffe R., et al. Incidental lesions found on CT colonography: their nature and frequency. Br J Radiol 2005, 78:22-29.
41. Hara A.K. Extracolonic findings at CT Colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005, 26:24-27.
42. Spreng A., Netzer P., Mattich J., et al. Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2005, 15:2088-2095.
43. Khan K.Y., Xiong T., McCafferty I., et al. Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population. Br J Surg 2007, 94:355-361.
44. Kim Y.S., Kim N., Kim S.Y., et al. Extracolonic findings in an asymptomatic screening population undergoing intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography colonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 23:49-57.
45. Park S.K., Park D.I., Lee S.Y., et al. Extracolonic findings of computed tomographic colonography in Koreans. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15:1487-1492.
46. Xiong T., McEvoy K., Morton D.G., et al. Resources and costs associated with incidental extracolonic findings from CT colonography: a study in a symptomatic population. Br J Radiol 2006, 79:948-961.
47. Hassan C., Pickhardt P.J., Laghi A., et al. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med 2008, 168:696-705.
48. Pickhardt P.J., Hassan C., Laghi A., et al. Colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:1332-1340.