Surface visualization at CT colonography simulated colonoscopy: Effect of varying field of view and retrograde view

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 2529-2535

  East, James E ^a   Saunders, Brian P ^a   Burling, David ^a   Boone, Darren ^b   Halligan, Steve ^b   Taylor, Stuart A ^b  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE; SUPINE POSITION;

EID: 35448990798     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01429.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 1992 326 : 658 62.
2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. The national polyp study workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993 329 : 1977 81.
3. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, et al. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated? Gut 2006 55 : 1145 50.
4. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: A population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004 127 : 452 6.
5. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005 129 : 34 41.
6. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 : 343 50.
7. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987 93 : 1009 13.
8. Postic G, Lewin D, Bickerstaff C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 : 3182 5.
9. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004 141 : 352 9.
10. Okada S, Kawamura Y, Sasaki J, et al. Diagnostic accuaracy of CT colonography evaluated by surgically resected specimen as the gold standard: Is optical colonoscopy adequate gold standard? Gastroenterology 2006 130 (Suppl 2 A196.
11. Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Gopal DV. Surface visualization at 3D endoluminal CT colonography: Degree of coverage and implications for polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2006 130 : 1582 7.
12. East JE, Saunders BP, Boone D, et al. Comprehensive mucosal visualization at optical colonoscopy: Technique remains the key. Gastroenterology 2006 131 : 975 6.
13. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170° wide-angle colonoscope: Effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 : 2138 42.
14. Rex DK, Chadalawada V, Helper DJ. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: Impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 : 2000 5.
15. Triadafilopoulos G, Watts D, Higgins J, et al. A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device ("Third Eye Retroscope™") improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomical models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 63 : AB103.
16. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: Effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 2003 229 : 99 108.
17. Bowles CJA, Leicester R, Romaya C, et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: Are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 2004 53 : 277 83.
18. Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for ct colonography. Am J Roentgenol 2006 186 : 1491 6.
19. Gizzi G, Pezzilli R, Villani V, et al. Impact of a prototype wide-angle colonoscope on polyp miss rates: A randomised endoscopic evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 : AB227.
20. Harrison M, Singh N, Rex DK. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 : 519 22.
21. Rex DK. Accessing proximal aspects of folds and flexures during colonoscopy: Impact of a pediatric colonoscope with a short bending section. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 : 1504 7.
22. Chen S, Rex DK. Endoscopist is comparable to age and gender as predictor of adenomas at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005 100 (Suppl S393.
23. Rex D. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000 51 : 33 6.
24. Thomas-Gibson S. Improving training and assessment in colonoscopy. MD thesis : Imperial College, University of London, London, United Kingdom, 2006.
25. East JE, Saunders BP, Boone D, et al. Wide angle 3D endolumial CT colonography: Impact on missed areas and polyp conspicuity. Gut 2007 56 (Suppl II A77.
26. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 : 333 8