CT colonography with limited bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in an FOBT positive screening population

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 661-668

  Liedenbaum, Marjolein H ^a   De Vries, Ayso H ^a   Van Rijn, Anne F ^a   Dekker, Helena M ^b   Willemssen, François E J A ^c   Van Leerdam, Monique E ^c   Van Marrewijk, Corine J ^b   Fockens, Paul ^a   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^d   Dekker, Evelien ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Advanced adenoma; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal neoplasia; CT colonography; FOBT

Indexed keywords

MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE;

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HAMARTOMA; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; LIPOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOTHALAMIC ACID; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78651248391     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-009-9586-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bond JH (2000) Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 95(11):3053-3063
2. Eide TJ (1986) Risk of colorectal cancer in adenoma-bearing individuals within a defined population. Int J Cancer 38(2):173-176
3. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC (1975) The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36(6):2251-2270
4. Bond JH (2000) Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas. Semin Gastrointest Dis 11(4):176-184
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56(3):143-159
6. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329(27):1977-1981
7. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. (2009) American college of gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 104(3):739-750
8. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E (2007) Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Jan 24(1):CD001216
9. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 58:130-160
10. Towler B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, et al. (1998) A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult. BMJ 317(7158):559-565
11. UK colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Group (2004) Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C
12. Van Rossum LG, Van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, et al. (2008) Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology 135(1):82-90
13. Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. (2009) Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut 58(9):1242-1249
14. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 359(12):1207-1217
15. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357(14):1403-1412
16. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349(23):2191-2200
17. Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 301(23):2453-2461
18. Neri E, Vagli P, Turini F, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography in patients with positive faecal occult blood test: results of the Italian project Legatumori 2003-2006. Radiol Med. doi:10.1007/s11547-009-0342-x.
19. Hol L, Wilschut JA, van BM, et al. (2009) Screening for colorectal cancer: random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical faecal occult blood testing at different cut-off levels. Br J Cancer 100(7):1103-1110
20. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, et al. (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219(3):693-698
21. Jensch S, de Vries AH, Pot D, et al. (2008) Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):158-167
22. Taylor SA, Slater A, Burling DN, et al. (2008) CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 18(1):32-42
23. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, van Rijn AF, Bipat S, Dekker E, Stoker J (2009) CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1570-8
24. Participants in the Paris workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6 Suppl):S3-S43
25. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. (2000) The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 47(2):251-255
26. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58(2):241-248
27. Fidler J, Johnson C (2009) Flat polyps of the colon: accuracy of detection by CT colonography and histologic significance. Abdom Imaging 34(2):157-171
28. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim AY, et al. (2006) Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography - preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1611-1617
29. Chen SC, Lu DS, Hecht JR, Kadell BM (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(3):595-599
30. Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, et al. (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226(3):653-661
31. Choi EK, Park SH, Kim DY, Ha HK (2007) Malignant rectal polyp overlooked on CT colonography because of retention balloon: opposing crescent appearance as sign of compressed polyp. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(1):W1-W3
32. Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Comparison of the relative sensitivity of CT colonography and double-contrast barium enema for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(4):314-321
33. Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, et al. (2007) Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):672-680