Computed tomographic colonography in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1291-1294

  Sabanli, M ^a   Balasingam, A ^a   Bailey, W ^a   Eglinton, T ^a   Hider, P ^a   Frizelle, F A ^a  

^a CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77955221544     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7098     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191-2200.
2. Leaper M, Johnston MJ, Barclay M, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma, at colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 499-503.
3. McDonald S, Lyall P, Israel L, Coates R, Frizelle F. Why barium enemas fail to identify colorectal cancers. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:631-633.
4. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Di Giulio E, Zullo A, Laghi A et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 210-217.
5. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:24-28.
6. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Leung WK, Winter TC, Hinshaw JL et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1403-1412.
7. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, Sangiovanni A, Del Favero C, Minoli G. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colonic diseases: a prospective blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 394-400.
8. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359: 1207-1217.
9. White TJ, Avery GR, Kennan N, Syed AM, Hartley JE, Monson JR. Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer - a prospective trial of 150 patients. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 138-145.
10. Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Rex DK. Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endos 1997; 45: 451-455.
11. Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal, cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 17-23.
12. Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Kumar PR, Wall SD. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 2003; 226: 653-661.
13. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH. Electronic cleansing and stool, tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls encountered, with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR. Am. J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 799-805.
14. Hoppe H, Netzer P, Spreng A, Quattropani C, Mattich J, Dinkel HP. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1924-1935.
15. Checker T, Dorta G, Keller W, Jornod P, Meuli R, Schnyder P. Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut 2002; 51: 207-211.