Corrigendum to: Audit of the introduction of CT colonography for detection of colorectal carcinoma in a non-academic environment and its implications for the national bowel cancer screening programme [64 (2) 142-147] (DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2008.10.005);Audit of the introduction of CT colonography for detection of colorectal carcinoma in a non-academic environment and its implications for the national bowel cancer screening programme

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 142-147

  Thomas, S ^a   Atchley, J ^a   Higginson, A ^a  

^a QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM SULFATE; IOHEXOL;

ARTICLE; BARIUM ENEMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL AUDIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 57649178173     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.02.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (10)

1. Tawn D.J., Squire C.J., Mohammed M.A., et al. National audit of the sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema for colorectal carcinoma, using control charts. Clin Radiol 60 (2005) 558-564
2. Vining D.J., Gelfand D.W., Bechtold R.E., et al. Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162 Suppl. (1994) 104
3. Burling D., Halligan S., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography practice in the UK: a national survey. Clin Radiol 59 (2004) 39-43
4. Halligan S., Altman D.G., Taylor S.A., et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 237 (2005) 893-904
5. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
6. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
7. Rockey D.C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365 (2005) 305-311
8. Halligan S., Lilford R.J., Wardle J., et al. Design of a multicentre randomized control trial to evaluate CT colonography versus colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colonic cancer in older symptomatic patients: the SIGGAR study. Trials 8 (2007) 32
9. Burling D., Halligan S., Atchley J., et al. CT colonography: interpretative performance in a non-academic environment. Clin Radiol 62 (2007) 424-429
10. Halligan S., Marshall M., Taylor S., et al. Observer variation in the detection of colorectal neoplasia on double-contrast barium enema: implications for colorectal cancer screening and training. Clin Radiol 58 (2003) 948-954