Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: A population-based study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2588-2596

  Singh, Harminder ^a   Nugent, Zoann ^a,b   Demers, Alain A ^a,b   Bernstein, Charles N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b CancerCare Manitoba ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILLING AND CLAIMS; CANADA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER REGISTRY; COLON ADENOCARCINOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMORBIDITY; DATA BASE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM CANCER; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMORBIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MANITOBA; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGISTRIES; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78649858214     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.390     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR et al. Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007. Am J Prev Med 2009;37: 8-16.
2. Arditi C, Peytremann-Bridevaux I, Burnand B et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in Europe (EPAGE II). Screening for colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 2009;41: 200-8.
3. Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Cancers after colonoscopy are likely related to missed lesions. Gastroenterology 2009;136 (Suppl 1): M1040.
4. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132: 96-102.
5. Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997;112: 17-23.
6. Roos NP, Black C, Roos LL et al. Managing health services: how the Population Health Information System (POPULIS) works for policymakers. Med Care 1999;37 (6 Suppl): JS27-41.
7. De CC, Luis A, Taylor MC. Do administrative databases accurately measure waiting times for medical care? Evidence from general surgery. Can J Surg 2007;50: 394-6.
8. Roos LL, Mustard CA, Nicol JP et al. Registries and administrative data: organization and accuracy. Med Care 1993;31: 201-12.
9. Robinson JR, Young TK, Roos LL et al. Estimating the burden of disease. Comparing administrative data and self-reports. Med Care 1997;35: 932-47.
10. Chen VW, Wu XC. Incidence, cancer in North America, 1991-1995. In: Andrews PA (ed). North American Association of Cancer Registries, April .1999. Sacramento, CA, 1999.
11. Hotes Ellison J, Wu XC, McLaughlin C et al. (eds). Cancer in North America: 1999-2003. Volume one: Incidence North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, 2006, pp II-325.
12. Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Rawsthorne P et al. Epidemiology of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in a central Canadian province: a populationbased study. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149: 916-24.
13. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for rightsided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004;127: 452-6.
14. Toma J, Paszat LF, Gunraj N et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancer after barium enema and their risk factors: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103: 3142-8.
15. Chen TH, Yen MF, Lai MS et al. Evaluation of a selective screening for colorectal carcinoma: the Taiwan Multicenter Cancer Screening (TAMCAS) project. Cancer 1999;86: 1116-28.
16. Jouve JL, Remontet L, Dancourt V et al. Estimation of screening test (Hemoccult) sensitivity in colorectal cancer mass screening. Br J Cancer 2001;84: 1477-81.
17. Roos LL, Walld R, Uhanova J et al. Physician visits, hospitalizations, and socioeconomic status: ambulatory care sensitive conditions in a Canadian setting. Health Serv Res 2005;40: 1167-85.
18. Mustard CA, Derksen S, Berthelot JM et al. Assessing ecologic proxies for household income: a comparison of household and neighbourhood level income measures in the study of population health status. Health Place 1999;5: 157-71.
19. Singh SM, Paszat LF, Li C et al. Association of socioeconomic status and receipt of colorectal cancer investigations: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2004;171: 461-5.
20. Hodgson DC, Fuchs CS, Ayanian JZ. Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93: 501-15.
21. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al. Coding algorithms for defi ning comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2005;43: 1130-9.
22. Sundararajan V, Quan H, Halfon P et al. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index. Med Care 2007;45: 1210-5.
23. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007;132:2297-303.
24. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L et al. Patient factors infl uencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2005;37: 113-8.
25. Shia J, Ellis NA, Paty PB et al. Value of histopathology in predicting microsatellite instability in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and sporadic colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27: 1407-17.
26. Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, Netta S et al. Prognostic signifi cance of mucinous component in colorectal carcinoma. Tech Coloproctol 2004;8 (Suppl 1): s123-5.
27. Psathakis D, Schiedeck TH, Krug F et al. Ordinary colorectal adenocarcinoma vs. primary colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma: study matched for age, gender, grade, and stage. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42: 1618-25.
28. Singh H, Penfold RB, De Coster C et al. Predictors of serious complications associated with lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in a major city-wide health region. Can J Gastroenterol 2010;24: 425-30.
29. Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105: 663-73.
30. Asfaha S, Alqahtani S, Hilsden RJ et al. Assessment of endoscopic training of general surgery residents in a North American health region. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68: 1056-62.
31. Romagnuolo J, Enns R, Ponich T et al. Canadian credentialing guidelines for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol 2008;22: 17-22.
32. Sharma VK, Coppola Jr AG, Raufman JP. A survey of credentialing practices of gastrointestinal endoscopy centers in the United States. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39: 501-7.
33. Singh H, Penfold RB, DeCoster C et al. Colonoscopy and its complications across a Canadian regional health authority. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69 (3 Suppl): 665-71.
34. Harewood GC. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50: 47-51.
35. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 2008;135: 1899-906.
36. Park DH, Kim HS, Kim WH et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and malignant potential of colorectal fl at neoplasia compared with that of polypoid neoplasia. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51: 43-9.
37. Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2005;352: 2061-8.
38. Woods SE, Basho S, Engel A. Th e infl uence of gender on colorectal cancer stage: the state of Ohio, 1996-2001. J Women's Health 2006;15: 877-81.
39. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49: 1373-9.