Multi-source transfer of delexicalized dependency parsers

EMNLP 2011 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 62-72

  McDonald, Ryan ^a   Petrov, Slav ^a   Hall, Keith ^b  

^a GOOGLE INC   (United States)

^b GOOGLE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY PARSER; LABELED TRAINING DATA; MULTIPLE SOURCE; MULTISOURCES; OVERALL QUALITY; PARALLEL CORPORA; SIMPLE METHOD; SOURCE LANGUAGE; STATE-OF-THE-ART PERFORMANCE; TARGET LANGUAGE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053242016     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. T. Berg-Kirkpatrick and D. Klein. 2010. Phylogenetic grammar induction. In Proc. of ACL.
2. P. Blunsom and T. Cohn. 2010. Unsupervised induction of tree substitution grammars for dependency parsing. Proc. of EMNLP.
3. P. F. Brown, V. J. Della Pietra, S. A. Della Pietra, and R. L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 19.
4. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of CoNLL.
5. D. Burkett, S. Petrov, J. Blitzer, and D. Klein. 2010. Learning better monolingual models with unannotated bilingual text. In Proc. of CoNLL.
6. G. Carroll and E. Charniak. 1992. Two experiments on learning probabilistic dependency grammars from corpora. In Proc. of the Working Notes of the Workshop Statistically-Based NLP Techniques.
7. M.W. Chang, L. Ratinov, and D. Roth. 2007. Guiding semi-supervision with constraint-driven learning. In Proc. of ACL.
8. M. Chang, D. Goldwasser, D. Roth, and V. Srikumar. 2010. Structured output learning with indirect supervision. In Proc. of ICML.
9. E. Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proc. of NAACL.
10. S. Clark and J. R. Curran. 2004. Parsing the WSJ using CCG and log-linear models. In Proc. of ACL.
11. S.B. Cohen and N.A. Smith. 2009. Shared logistic normal distributions for soft parameter tying in unsuper-vised grammar induction. In Proc. of NAACL.
12. S.B. Cohen, D. Das, and N.A. Smith. 2011. Unsuper-vised structure prediction with non-parallel multilingual guidance. In Proc. of EMNLP.
13. M. Collins, J. Hajič, L. Ramshaw, and C. Tillmann. 1999. A statistical parser for Czech. In Proc. of ACL.
14. M. Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proc. of ACL.
15. M. Collins. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proc. of ACL.
16. D. Das and S. Petrov. 2011. Unsupervised part-of-speech tagging with bilingual graph-based projections. In Proc. of ACL-HLT.
17. K. Ganchev, J. Gillenwater, and B. Taskar. 2009. Dependency grammar induction via bitext projection constraints. In Proc. of ACL-IJCNLP.
18. K. Ganchev, J. Graça, J. Gillenwater, and B. Taskar. 2010. Posterior regularization for structured latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
19. D. Gildea. 2001. Corpus variation and parser performance. In Proc of EMNLP.
20. K. Hall, R. McDonald, J. Katz-Brown, and M. Ringgaard. 2011. Training dependency parsers by jointly optimizing multiple objectives. In Proc. of EMNLP.
21. R. Hwa, P. Resnik, A. Weinberg, C. Cabezas, and O. Kolak. 2005. Bootstrapping parsers via syntactic projection across parallel texts. Natural Language Engineering, 11(03):311-325.
22. D. Klein and C. D. Manning. 2004. Corpus-based induction of syntactic structure: models of dependency and constituency. In Proc. of ACL.
23. P. Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In MT Summit.
24. M. P. Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19.
25. D. McClosky, E. Charniak, and M. Johnson. 2006. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. In Proc. of ACL.
26. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proc. of ACL.
27. T. Naseem, H. Chen, R. Barzilay, and M. Johnson. 2010. Using universal linguistic knowledge to guide grammar induction. In Proc. of EMNLP.
28. J. Nivre and J. Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing. In Proc. of ACL.
29. J. Nivre, J. Hall, and J. Nilsson. 2006. Maltparser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proc. of LREC.
30. J. Nivre, J. Hall, S. Kübler, R. McDonald, J. Nilsson, S. Riedel, and D. Yuret. 2007. The CoNLL 2007 shared task on dependency parsing. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL.
31. J. Nivre. 2008. Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):513-553.
32. S. Petrov, L. Barrett, R. Thibaux, and D. Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proc. of ACL.
33. S. Petrov, P. Chang, M. Ringgaard, and H. Alshawi. 2010. Uptraining for accurate deterministic question parsing. In EMNLP '10.
34. S. Petrov, D. Das, and R. McDonald. 2011. A universal part-of-speech tagset. In ArXiv:1104.2086.
35. Y. Seginer. 2007. Fast unsupervised incremental parsing. In Proc. of ACL.
36. L. Shen and A.K. Joshi. 2008. Ltag dependency parsing with bidirectional incremental construction. In Proc. of EMNLP.
37. N.A. Smith and J. Eisner. 2005. Contrastive estimation: Training log-linear models on unlabeled data. In Proc. of ACL.
38. D.A. Smith and J. Eisner. 2009. Parser adaptation and projection with quasi-synchronous grammar features. In Proc. of EMNLP.
39. D.A. Smith and N.A. Smith. 2004. Bilingual parsing with factored estimation: Using english to parse korean. In Proc. of EMNLP.
40. B. Snyder, T. Naseem, J. Eisenstein, and R. Barzilay. 2009. Adding more languages improves unsupervised multilingual part-of-speech tagging: A Bayesian non-parametric approach. In Proc. of NAACL.
41. A. Søgaard. 2011. Data point selection for cross-language adaptation of dependency parsers. In Proc. ACL.
42. V.I. Spitkovsky, H. Alshawi, and D. Jurafsky. 2010. From baby steps to leapfrog: How "less is more" in un-supervised dependency parsing. In Proc. of NAACL-HLT.
43. S. Vogel, H. Ney, and C. Tillmann. 1996. HMM-based word alignment in statistical translation. In Proc. of COLING.
44. W. Wang and M. P. Harper. 2004. A statistical constraint dependency grammar (CDG) parser. In Proc. of the Workshop on Incremental Parsing: Bringing Engineering and Cognition Together.
45. D. Zeman and P. Resnik. 2008. Cross-language parser adaptation between related languages. In NLP for Less Privileged Languages.
46. Y. Zhang and S. Clark. 2008. A Tale of Two Parsers: Investigating and Combining Graph-based and Transition-based Dependency Parsing. In Proc. of EMNLP.