CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing

Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL-X

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Buchholz, Sabine ^a   Marsi, Erwin ^b  

^a TOSHIBA CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE LEARNING; TREEBANKS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85086490822     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1596276.1596305     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (82)

1. A. Abeillé, editor. 2003. Treebanks: Building and Using Parsed Corpora, volume 20 of Text, Speech and Language Technology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
2. S. Afonso, E. Bick, R. Haber, and D. Santos. 2002. "Floresta sintá(c)tica": a treebank for Portuguese. In Proc. of the 3rd Intern. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 1698-1703.
3. A. Arun and F. Keller. 2005. Lexicalization in crosslinguistic probabilistic parsing: The case of French. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
4. N. B. Atalay, K. Oflazer, and B. Say. 2003. The annotation process in the Turkish treebank. In Proc. of the 4th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC).
5. G. Attardi. 2006. Experiments with a multilanguage nonprojective dependency parser. In CoNLL-X.
6. E. Bick. 2006. LingPars, a linguistically inspired, languageindependent machine learner for dependency treebanks. In CoNLL-X. 34For the Swedish Talbanken05 corpus, that work has been done after the shared task (see the treebank's web site).
7. D. Bikel. 2002. Design of a multi-lingual, parallel-processing statistical parsing engine. In Proc. of the Human Language Technology Conf. (HLT).
8. E. Black, S. Abney, D. Flickenger, C. Gdaniec, R. Grishman, P. Harrison, D. Hindle, R. Ingria, F. Jelinek, J. Klavans, M. Liberman, M. Marcus, S. Roukos, B. Santorini, and T. Strzalkowski. 1991. A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars. In Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Pacific Grove, California.
9. E. Black, F. Jelinek, J. Lafferty, D. Magerman, R. Mercer, and S. Roukos. 1993. Towards history-based grammars: Using richer models for probabilistic parsing. In Proc. of the 31rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
10. A. Böhmová, J. Hajič, E. Hajičová, and B. Hladká. 2003. The PDT: a 3-level annotation scenario. In Abeillé (Abeillé, 2003), chapter 7.
11. S. Brants, S. Dipper, S. Hansen, W. Lezius, and G. Smith. 2002. The TIGER treebank. In Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
12. S. Buchholz and D. Green. 2006. Quality control of treebanks: documenting, converting, patching. In LREC 2006 workshop on Quality assurance and quality measurement for language and speech resources.
13. S. Canisius, T. Bogers, A. van den Bosch, J. Geertzen, and E. Tjong Kim Sang. 2006. Dependency parsing by inference over high-recall dependency predictions. In CoNLL-X.
14. A. Chanev, K. Simov, P. Osenova, and S. Marinov. 2006. Dependency conversion and parsing of the BulTreeBank. In Proc. of the LREC-Workshop Merging and Layering Linguistic Information.
15. M. Chang, Q. Do, and D. Roth. 2006. A pipeline model for bottom-up dependency parsing. In CoNLL-X.
16. K. Chen, C. Luo, M. Chang, F. Chen, C. Chen, C. Huang, and Z. Gao. 2003. Sinica treebank: Design criteria, representational issues and implementation. In Abeillé (Abeillé, 2003), chapter 13, pages 231-248.
17. Y. Cheng, M. Asahara, and Y. Matsumoto. 2005. Chinese deterministic dependency analyzer: Examining effects of global features and root node finder. In Proc. of SIGHAN-2005.
18. Y.J. Chu and T.H. Liu. 1965. On the shortest arborescence of a directed graph. Science Sinica, 14:1396-1400.
19. M. Civit, Ma A. Martí, B. Navarro, N. Bufi, B. Fernández, and R. Marcos. 2003. Issues in the syntactic annotation of Cast3LB. In Proc. of the 4th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC).
20. M. Civit Torruella and Ma A. Martí Antonín. 2002. Design principles for a Spanish treebank. In Proc. of the 1st Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
21. M. Collins, J. Hajic, L. Ramshaw, and C. Tillmann. 1999. A statistical parser for Czech. In Proc. of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
22. M. Collins. 1996. A new statistical parser based on bigram lexical dependencies. In Proc. of the 34th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
23. M. Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proc. of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
24. M. Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
25. S. Corston-Oliver and A. Aue. 2006. Dependency parsing with reference to Slovene, Spanish and Swedish. In CoNLL-X.
26. B. Cowan andM. Collins. 2005. Morphology and reranking for the statistical parsing of Spanish. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP).
27. D. Csendes, J. Csirik, and T. Gyimóthy. 2004. The Szeged corpus: a POS tagged and syntactically annotated Hungarian natural language corpus. In Proc. of the 5th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC).
28. W. Daelemans, J. Zavrel, P. Berck, and S. Gillis. 1996. MBT: A memory-based part of speech tagger-generator. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Very Large Corpora (VLC).
29. M. Dreyer, D. Smith, and N. Smith. 2006. Vine parsing and minimum risk reranking for speed and precision. In CoNLLX.
30. A. Dubey and F. Keller. 2003. Probabilistic parsing for German using sister-head dependencies. In Proc. of the 41st Annual Meeting of the ACL.
31. Džeroski, T. Erjavec, N. Ledinek, P. Pajas, Z. Žabokrtsky, and A. Žele. 2006. Towards a Slovene dependency treebank. In Proc. of the 5th Intern. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).
32. J. Edmonds. 1967. Optimum branchings. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 71B:233-240.
33. J. Einarsson. 1976. Talbankens skriftspråkskonkordans.
34. J. Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proc. of the 16th Intern. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 340-345.
35. D. Elworthy. 2000. A finite-state parser with dependency structure output. In Proc. of the 6th Intern. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT).
36. H. Gaifman. 1965. Dependency systems and phrase-structure systems. Information and Control, 8:304-337.
37. J. Hajič, O. Smrž, P. Zemánek, J. Šnaidauf, and E. Beška. 2004. Prague Arabic dependency treebank: Development in data and tools. In Proc. of the NEMLAR Intern. Conf. on Arabic Language Resources and Tools, pages 110-117.
38. D. Hays. 1964. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language, 40:511-525.
39. R. Hudson. 1984. Word Grammar. Blackwell.
40. R. Johansson and P. Nugues. 2006. Investigating multilingual dependency parsing. In CoNLL-X.
41. Y. Kawata and J. Bartels. 2000. Stylebook for the Japanese treebank in VERBMOBIL. Verbmobil-Report 240, Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Tübingen.
42. M. T. Kromann. 2003. The Danish dependency treebank and the underlying linguistic theory. In Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT).
43. T. Kudo and Y. Matsumoto. 2000. Japanese dependency structure analysis based on support vector machines. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (EMNLP/VLC).
44. S. Kurohashi andM. Nagao. 1994. KN parser: Japanese dependency/case structure analyzer. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Sharable Natural Language, pages 48-55.
45. S. Kurohashi and M. Nagao. 1997. Kyoto University text corpus project. In Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP), pages 115-118.
46. Y. Lepage, S. Ando, S. Akamine, and H. Iida. 1998. An annotated corpus in Japanese using Tesnière's structural syntax. In ACL-COLING Workshop on Processing of Dependency-Based Grammars, pages 109-115.
47. D. Lin. 1995. A dependency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers. In Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI).
48. D. Magerman. 1995. Statistical decision-tree models for parsing. In Proc. of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 276-283.
49. M. Marcus, G. Kim, M. Marcinkiewicz, R. Mac-Intyre, A. Bies, M. Ferguson, K. Katz, and B. Schasberger. 1994. The Penn treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. In Proc. of the Workshop on Human Language Technology (HLT).
50. S. Marinov and J. Nivre. 2005. A data-driven dependency parser for Bulgarian. In Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT), pages 89-100.
51. R. McDonald and F. Pereira. 2006. Online learning of approximate dependency parsing algorithms. In Proc. of the 11th Conf. of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL).
52. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005a. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
53. R. McDonald, F. Pereira, K. Ribarov, and J. Hajic. 2005b. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proc. of the Joint Conf. on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP).
54. R. McDonald, K. Lerman, and F. Pereira. 2006. Multilingual dependency analysis with a two-stage discriminative parser. In CoNLL-X.
55. I. Mel'čuk. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. The SUNY Press, Albany, N.Y.
56. B. Navarro, M. Civit, Ma A. Martí, R. Marcos, and B. Fernández. 2003. Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic annotation in Cast3LB. In Proc. of the Workshop on Shallow Processing of Large Corpora (SProLaC).
57. J. Nilsson, J. Hall, and J. Nivre. 2005. MAMBA meets TIGER: Reconstructing a Swedish treebank from antiquity. In Proc. of the NODALIDA Special Session on Treebanks.
58. J. Nivre and J. Nilsson. 2005. Pseudo-projective dependency parsing. In Proc. of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 99-106.
59. J. Nivre and M. Scholz. 2004. Deterministic dependency parsing of English text. In Proc. of the 20th Intern. Conf. on Computational Linguistics (COLING), pages 64-70.
60. J. Nivre, J. Hall, and J. Nilsson. 2004. Memory-based dependency parsing. In Proc. of the 8th Conf. on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pages 49-56.
61. J. Nivre, J. Hall, J. Nilsson, G. Eryiǧit, and S. Marinov. 2006. Labeled pseudo-projective dependency parsing with support vector machines. In CoNLL-X.
62. K. Oflazer, B. Say, D. Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and G. Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. In Abeillé (Abeillé, 2003), chapter 15.
63. K. Oflazer. 1999. Dependency parsing with an extended finite state approach. In Proc. of the 37th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 254-260.
64. P. Osenova and K. Simov. 2004. BTB-TR05: Bul-TreeBank stylebook. BulTreeBank version 1.0. Bultreebank project technical report. Available at: http://www.bultreebank.org/TechRep/BTB-TR05.pdf.
65. S. Riedel, R. Çaki{dotless}ci{dotless}, and I. Meza-Ruiz. 2006. Multi-lingual dependency parsing with incremental integer linear programming. In CoNLL-X.
66. G. Sampson. 1995. English for the Computer: The SUSANNE Corpus and analytic scheme. Clarendon Press.
67. M. Schiehlen and K. Spranger. 2006. Language independent probabilistic context-free parsing bolstered by machine learning. In CoNLL-X.
68. N. Shimizu. 2006. Maximum spanning tree algorithm for nonprojective labeled dependency parsing. In CoNLL-X.
69. K. Sima'an, A. Itai, Y. Winter, A. Altman, and N. Nativ. 2001. Building a tree-bank of modern Hebrew text. In Journal Traitement Automatique des Langues (t.a.l.)-Special Issue on Natural Language Processing and Corpus Linguistics.
70. K. Simov and P. Osenova. 2003. Practical annotation scheme for an HPSG treebank of Bulgarian. In Proc. of the 4th Intern. Workshop on Linguistically Interpreteted Corpora (LINC), pages 17-24.
71. K. Simov, G. Popova, and P. Osenova. 2002. HPSG-based syntactic treebank of Bulgarian (BulTreeBank). In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, and T. McEnery, editors, A Rainbow of Corpora: Corpus Linguistics and the Languages of the World, pages 135-142. Lincom-Europa, Munich.
72. K. Simov, P. Osenova, and M. Slavcheva. 2004. BTBTR03: BulTreeBank morphosyntactic tagset. BTB-TS version 2.0. Bultreebank project technical report. Available at: http://www.bultreebank.org/TechRep/BTB-TR03.pdf.
73. K. Simov, P. Osenova, A. Simov, and M. Kouylekov. 2005. Design and implementation of the Bulgarian HPSG-based treebank. In Journal of Research on Language and Computation-Special Issue, pages 495-522. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
74. D. Sleator and D. Temperley. 1993. Parsing English with a link grammar. In Proc. of the 3rd Intern. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT).
75. O. Smrž, J. Šnaidauf, and P. Zemánek. 2002. Prague dependency treebank for Arabic: Multi-level annotation of Arabic corpus. In Proc. of the Intern. Symposium on Processing of Arabic, pages 147-155.
76. P. Tapanainen and T. Järvinen. 1997. A non-projective dependency parser. In Proc. of the 5th Conf. on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP).
77. U. Teleman, 1974. Manual för grammatisk beskrivning av talad och skriven svenska (MAMBA).
78. L. Tesnière. 1959. Elément de syntaxe structurale. Klincksieck, Paris.
79. L. van der Beek, G. Bouma, J. Daciuk, T. Gaustad, R. Malouf, G. van Noord, R. Prins, and B. Villada. 2002a. The Alpino dependency treebank. In Algorithms for Linguistic Processing, NWO PIONIER progress report 5.
80. L. van der Beek, G. Bouma, R. Malouf, and G. van Noord. 2002b. The Alpino dependency treebank. In Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (CLIN).
81. H. Yamada and Y. Matsumoto. 2003. Statistical dependency analysis with support vector machines. In Proc. of the 8th Intern. Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT), pages 195-206.
82. D. Yuret. 2006. Dependency parsing as a classication problem. In CoNLL-X.