Training dependency parsers by jointly optimizing multiple objectives

EMNLP 2011 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1489-1499

  Hall, Keith ^a   McDonald, Ryan ^a   Katz Brown, Jason ^a   Ringgaard, Michael ^a  

^a GOOGLE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEPENDENCY PARSER; DEPENDENCY PARSING; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; EXTRINSIC MEASURES; GRAPH-BASED; LOSS FUNCTIONS; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; MULTIPLE TARGETS; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; ONLINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053269168     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. S. Banerjee and A. Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or Summarization.
2. J. Berant, I. Dagan, and J. Goldberger. 2010. Global learning of focused entailment graphs. In Proc. of ACL.
3. J. Blitzer, R. McDonald, and F. Pereira. 2006. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In Proc. of EMNLP.
4. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proc. of CoNLL.
5. D. Burkett, J. Blitzer, and D. Klein. 2010. Joint parsing and alignment with weakly synchronized grammars. In Proc. of NAACL.
6. R. Caruana. 1997. Multitask learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):41-75.
7. M.W. Chang, L. Ratinov, and D. Roth. 2007. Guiding semi-supervision with constraint-driven learning. In Proc. of ACL.
8. M. Chang, D. Goldwasser, D. Roth, and V. Srikumar. 2010. Structured output learning with indirect supervision. In Proc. of ICML.
9. M. Collins, P. Koehn, and I. Kučerová. 2005. Clause restructuring for statistical machine translation. In Proc. of ACL.
10. Michael Collins. 2000. Discriminative reranking for natural language parsing. In Proc. of ICML.
11. M. Collins. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proc. of ACL.
12. M.C. de Marneffe, B. MacCartney, and C. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proc. of LREC, Genoa, Italy.
13. J.R. Finkel and C.D. Manning. 2009. Joint parsing and named entity recognition. In Proc. of NAACL.
14. K. Ganchev, J. Graça, J. Gillenwater, and B. Taskar. 2010. Posterior regularization for structured latent variable models. Journal of Machine Learning Research.
15. D. Gildea. 2001. Corpus variation and parser performance. In Proc. of EMNLP.
16. K. Hall. 2007. k-best spanning tree parsing. In Proc. of ACL, June.
17. J. Judge, A. Cahill, and J. Van Genabith. 2006. Question-bank: Creating a corpus of parse-annotated questions. In Proc. of ACL, pages 497-504.
18. J. Katz-Brown, S. Petrov, R. McDonald, D. Talbot, F. Och, H. Ichikawa, M. Seno, and H. Kazawa. 2011. Training a parser for machine translation reordering. In Proc. of EMNLP.
19. S. Kübler, R. McDonald, and J. Nivre. 2009. Dependency parsing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
20. P. Liang, A. Bouchard-Ct, D. Klein, and B. Taskar. 2006. An end-to-end discriminative approach to machine translation. In Proc. of COLING/ACL.
21. G.S. Mann and A. McCallum. 2010. Generalized Expectation Criteria for Semi-Supervised Learning with Weakly Labeled Data. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:955-984.
22. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M.A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
23. D. McClosky, E. Charniak, and M. Johnson. 2006. Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation. In Proc. of ACL.
24. R. McDonald and J. Nivre. 2007. Characterizing the errors of data-driven dependency parsing models. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL.
25. R. McDonald, K. Crammer, and F. Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proc. of ACL.
26. T. Nakagawa, K. Inui, and S. Kurohashi. 2010. Dependency tree-based sentiment classification using crfs with hidden variables. In Proc. of NAACL.
27. J. Nivre. 2008. Algorithms for deterministic incremental dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):513-553.
28. S. Petrov, P.C. Chang, M. Ringgaard, and H. Alshawi. 2010. Uptraining for accurate deterministic question parsing. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 705-713.
29. D. Talbot, H. Kazawa, H. Ichikawa, J. Katz-Brown, M. Seno, and F. Och. 2011. A lightweight evaluation framework for machine translation reordering. In Proc. of the Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation.
30. M. Wang, N.A. Smith, and T. Mitamura. 2007. What is the Jeopardy model? A quasi-synchronous grammar for QA. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL.
31. P. Xu, J. Kang, M. Ringgaard, and F. Och. 2009. Using a dependency parser to improve SMT for Subject-Object-Verb languages. In Proc. of NAACL.
32. A. Yates and O. Etzioni. 2009. Unsupervised methods for determining object and relation synonyms on the web. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 34(1):255-296.
33. Y. Zhang and S. Clark. 2008. A Tale of Two Parsers: Investigating and Combining Graph-based and Transition-based Dependency Parsing. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 562-571.