Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: The added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization

Radiology

Volumn 261, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 69-79

  Thomassin Naggara, Isabelle ^a,b   Trop, Isabelle ^a   Chopier, Jocelyne ^b   David, Julie ^a   Lalonde, Lucie ^a   Darai, Emile ^b   Rouzier, Roman ^b   Uzan, Serge ^b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOTERIDOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM CRITERIA; BREAST LESION; BREAST SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NONMASSLIKE ENHANCEMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REFERENCE VALUE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053082692     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110190     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS: magnetic resonance imaging. In:ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System(BI-RADS) breast imaging atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
2. Baltzer PA, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(6):1658-1663.
3. Thomassin-Naggara I, Salem C, Darai E, et al. Non-masslike enhancement on breast MRI: interpretation pearls [in French]. J Radiol 2009;90(3 pt 1):269-275.
4. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(4):994-1000.
5. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Fütterer JJ, Boetes C, Van Die LE, Jager G, Barentsz JO. Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40(6):355-362. (Pubitemid 40734564)
6. Ikeda DM. Progress report from the American College of Radiology Breast MR Imaging Lexicon Committee. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001;9(2):295-302. (Pubitemid 32816428)
7. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179(1):171-178. (Pubitemid 34694831)
8. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol 2005;15(9):2010-2017. (Pubitemid 41222910)
9. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI de scriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187(2):330-337. (Pubitemid 44148274)
10. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
11. Tillman GF, Orel SG, Schnall MD, Schultz DJ, Tan JE, Solin LJ. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(16):3413-3423.
12. Kuhl CK, Schild HH, Morakkabati N. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution. Radiology 2005;236(3):789-800. (Pubitemid 41170839)
13. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 2007;370(9586):485-492. (Pubitemid 47214635)
14. Zhang Y, Fukatsu H, Naganawa S, et al. The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery. Breast Cancer 2002;9(3):231-239.
15. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, et al. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(2):417-424. (Pubitemid 27334851)
16. Fischer U. Practical MR mammography. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme, 2003.
17. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system(BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40(3):409-430. (Pubitemid 34765031)
18. Hambly NM, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Brennan S, Morris EA. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: impact on biopsy rate and shortinterval follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(1):218-224.
19. Fitzgibbons PL, Henson DE, Hutter RV. Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer: an update of the 1985 consensus statement. Cancer Committee of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122(12):1053-1055. (Pubitemid 29009396)
20. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer 2008;15(3):241-246.
21. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, et al. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrastenhanced breast MR imaging:lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol 2010;75(1):e126-e132.
22. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181(2):519-525. (Pubitemid 36909502)
23. Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging:multicenter study. Radiology 2006;238(1):42-53. (Pubitemid 43010579)
24. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, et al. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13(6):889-895. (Pubitemid 32479947)
25. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997;202(3):833-841.
26. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001;219(2):484-494. (Pubitemid 32336366)
27. Eby PR, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL, Lehman CD. Probably benign lesions detected on breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010;18(2):309-321.