Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI

Breast Cancer

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 241-246

  Sakamoto, Naomi ^a   Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ^a   Higa, Kuniki ^a   Tsunoda, Yuko ^a   Ogawa, Tomoko ^a   Abe, Satoko ^a   Ozaki, Shinji ^a   Sakamoto, Masaaki ^a   Tsuruhara, Tomoko ^a   Kawano, Naoko ^a   Suzuki, Takako ^a   Yamashiro, Norie ^a   Fukuma, Eisuke ^a  

^a KAMEDA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Categorization; MRI; Non mass like lesions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST DISEASES; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 59149098669     PISSN: 13406868     EISSN: 18804233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-007-0028-6     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989;171:95-103. (Pubitemid 19093051)
2. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1989;170:681-6. (Pubitemid 19062582)
3. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, Savino DA, Wells RV. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493-501. (Pubitemid 23127861)
4. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994;190:485-93. (Pubitemid 24044258)
5. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 1994;193:777-81.
6. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101-10. (Pubitemid 29161739)
7. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-8.
8. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting, data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
9. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Abramson AF, Dashnaw SM, Ballon DJ, Dershaw DD: Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171-78. (Pubitemid 34694831)
10. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2010-7. (Pubitemid 41222910)
11. Tozaki M, Fukuda K: High-Spatial-Resolution MRI of nonmasslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330-7. (Pubitemid 44148274)
12. Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:313-21. (Pubitemid 44148272)
13. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, et al. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006;239:385-91.
14. Schnall MD, Ikeda DM. Lesion diagnosis working group on breast MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:982-90.
15. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:889-95. (Pubitemid 32479947)
16. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:519-25. (Pubitemid 36909502)
17. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220:31-9. (Pubitemid 32577956)
18. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006;106:982-90.