Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 169, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 417-424

  Mumtaz, Hamid ^a,b   Hall Craggs, Margaret A ^a   Walmslev, Davidson K ^a   Thurell, W ^a   Kissin, M W ^a   Taylor, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030788902     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242745     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Holland R, Veiling SHJ, Mravunac M, et al. Histologie multifocality of Tis, T 1- 2 breast carcinoma: implications for clinical trials of breast conserving surgery. Cancer 1985;56:979-990
2. Haagensen CD. Treatment of curable carcinoma of the breast. lut J Radiât Oncol Biol Phys 1977; 2: 975-980
3. Pain J, Ebbs S, Hem R, et al. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Eur J Srg Oncol 199 2; 18:44-48
4. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five year summary report. Cancer J Clin 198 2;3 2: 194- 2 25
5. Boetes C, Roel D, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995; 197:743-747
6. Hulka AC, Smith BL, Sgroni DC, et al. Benign and malignant lesions: differentiation with echo planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:33-38
7. Flickinger FW, Allison JD, Sherry RM, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses by time-intensity evaluation of contrast enhanced MRI. Klagn Reson Imaging 1993;! 1:6 17-6 20
8. Boetes C, Mus RD, Barentsz JO, et al. MR characterisation of suspicious breast lesions by using a gadolinium-enhanced turboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-78 1
9. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologie-pathologie correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493
10. Hermansen C, Poulsen HS, Jensen J, et al. Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography and fine needle puncture ("triple-test") in breast tumours. Cancer 1987;60: 1867- 187 1
11. 1. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Evans \VP, et al. MR imaging of the breast: current status and future potential. AJR 1994;I63: 1039-I047
12. 2. Harms SE, Flaniig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation of resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-50 1
13. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196: 1 15- 1 2 2
14. Schnitt SJ, Conolly JL, Harris JR, et al. Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in stage I and II breast cancer treated by radiation therapy. Cancer 1984;53: 1049- 1057
15. Smitl MC, Nowels KE, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long tenu results of breast conservation. Cancer 1995;76: 259- 267
16. Renton SC, Gazet JC, Ford HT, et al. The importance of resection margin in conservative surgery. EiirJSurg Oncol 1996; 2 2: 17- 2 2
17. Frazier TG, Wong R\V, Rose D. Implications of accurate pathologic margins in the treatment of primary breast cancer. ArchSurg 1989; 1 24:37-38
18. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, et al. Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (protocol 6): relation of local recurrence to multicentricity. Cancer 1986 7: 1717-1724
19. Carter C, Alien C, Henson D. Relation of tumour size, lymph node status, and survival in 24 740 breast cancer cases. Career 1989;63: 18 1- 187
20. Flanagan FL, McDermott MB, Barton PT, et al. Invasive breast cancer: mammographie measurement. Radiology 1996; 199:8 19-8 23
21. 1. Gilles R, Zafarani B, Guinebreliere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995; 196:4 15-4 19
22. 2. Kerslake RW, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, et al. Dynamic gradient-echo and fat-suppressed spinecho contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Clin Radial 1995;50:440-454
23. Ohtake T, Abe R, Kimijima I, et al. Intraductal extension of primary invasive breast carcinoma treated by breast conservative surgery. Cancer 199S;76:3 2-45
24. Ikheda DM, Helvie MA, Frank TS, et al. Paget's disease of the nipple: radiologie-pathologie correlation. Radiology 1993; 189:89-94
25. Kaiser WA. Clinical aspects. In: Kaiser WA, ed. MR mammography (MRM). Berlin: SpringerVerlag, 1993:66-67