Breast MR imaging: Interpretation model

Radiology

Volumn 202, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 833-841

  Nunes, Linda White ^a   Schnall, Mitchell D ^b   Orel, Susan G ^b   Hochman, Mary G ^c   Langlotz, Curtis P ^b   Reynolds, Carol A ^b   Torosian, Michael H ^b  

^a ALLEGHENY UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast neoplasms, MR; Decision theory; Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CYTOARCHITECTURE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0031056465     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051042     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet 1985; 1:829-832.
2. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. CA Cancer J Clin 1982; 32:194-225.
3. Kopans DB. Preoperative imaging-guided needle placement and localization of clinically occult lesions. In: Kopans DB, ed. Breast imaging. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1989; 320-341.
4. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187:493-501.
5. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
6. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology 1994; 193:97-102.
7. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103.
8. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, Dervan PA, Ennis JT. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990; 174:491-494.
9. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686.
10. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 197:33-38.
11. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
12. Rubens D, Totterman S, Chacko AK, et al. Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1991; 157:267-270.
13. Gilles R, Guinebretière JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191: 625-631.
14. Nunes LW, Orel SG, Schnall MD. Diagnostic accuracy and lesion characteristic predictive values in the MR imaging evaluation of breast masses (abstr). Radiology 1994; 267(P):853.
15. Swets JA, Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. Enhancing and evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:9-18.
16. Wu Y, Giger ML, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, Schmidt RA, Metz CE. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology 1993; 187:81-87.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36.
18. Gilles R, Guinebretière JM, Shapeero LG, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993; 188:473-478.